性别和出生顺序与中国儿童非国家免疫规划疫苗覆盖率的独立和联合关联:横断面分析。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hongyu Cai, Yaguan Zhou, Anna Heng Du, Yu Wang, Qian Long, Holly Seale, Shenglan Tang, Xiaolin Xu
{"title":"性别和出生顺序与中国儿童非国家免疫规划疫苗覆盖率的独立和联合关联:横断面分析。","authors":"Hongyu Cai, Yaguan Zhou, Anna Heng Du, Yu Wang, Qian Long, Holly Seale, Shenglan Tang, Xiaolin Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02502-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to declining fertility rates, China implemented universal two- and three-child policies, leading to an increase of multi-child families. However, little is known whether and how these policy changes influenced the uptake of non-National Immunization Program (non-NIP) vaccines. We evaluated associations of sex and birth order with non-NIP vaccine coverage in 1-6-year-old children in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study was a cross-sectional survey of caregivers of 1-6-year-old children in Zhejiang and Henan Provinces in 2022. We obtained information on sex, birth order, vaccination history, and family socio-demographics and determined uptake of five commonly-used non-NIP vaccines for infants [Haemophilus influenza b (Hib), varicella, rotavirus, enterovirus 71 (EV71), and 13-valent pneumococcal (PCV13) vaccines]. Children were considered vaccinated if they received the first dose of at least three of these vaccines. Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for independent and joint associations of sex and birth order with non-NIP vaccine coverage, and multiplicative and additive interactions of sex and birth order.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1611 children with accompanying parents/guardians were included in the survey; 48.0% (n = 773) were girls; the median age was 3.3 years (interquartile range 2.0-4.8); and 824 (51.1%) were first-born children, 578 (35.9%) were second-born children, and 209 (13.0%) were third-or-later born children. Coverage of non-NIP vaccines varied by sex and birth order, ranging from 58.2% for first-born boys to 28.4% for third-or-later born girls. Coverage among girls was less than among boys (PR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82-1.00), but the sex differences were not significant after adjusting for sociodemographic factors (PR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03). Compared with first-born children, coverage PRs were 0.85 (0.76-0.93) for second-born children and 0.82 (0.65-1.00) for third-or-later born children (p for trend < 0.001). Sex and birth order had joint effects on coverage, with the lowest coverage PRs in the third-or-later born girls (0.71, 95% CI: 0.49-0.97), compared to first-born boys. Multiplicative interactions of sex and birth order were significant (PR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.98 in second-born girls).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Birth order of children was independently associated with non-NIP vaccines coverage, whereas sex showed no significant. However, sex and birth order were jointly associated with receipt of non-NIP vaccines, with later born children and girls having significantly lower coverage than first-born boys. In the context of the three-child policy in China, interventions to promote non-NIP vaccine equity should consider children's sex and birth order.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"131"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independent and joint associations of sex and birth order with non‑national immunization program vaccine coverage among Chinese children: a cross-sectional analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hongyu Cai, Yaguan Zhou, Anna Heng Du, Yu Wang, Qian Long, Holly Seale, Shenglan Tang, Xiaolin Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12939-025-02502-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to declining fertility rates, China implemented universal two- and three-child policies, leading to an increase of multi-child families. However, little is known whether and how these policy changes influenced the uptake of non-National Immunization Program (non-NIP) vaccines. We evaluated associations of sex and birth order with non-NIP vaccine coverage in 1-6-year-old children in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study was a cross-sectional survey of caregivers of 1-6-year-old children in Zhejiang and Henan Provinces in 2022. We obtained information on sex, birth order, vaccination history, and family socio-demographics and determined uptake of five commonly-used non-NIP vaccines for infants [Haemophilus influenza b (Hib), varicella, rotavirus, enterovirus 71 (EV71), and 13-valent pneumococcal (PCV13) vaccines]. Children were considered vaccinated if they received the first dose of at least three of these vaccines. Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for independent and joint associations of sex and birth order with non-NIP vaccine coverage, and multiplicative and additive interactions of sex and birth order.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1611 children with accompanying parents/guardians were included in the survey; 48.0% (n = 773) were girls; the median age was 3.3 years (interquartile range 2.0-4.8); and 824 (51.1%) were first-born children, 578 (35.9%) were second-born children, and 209 (13.0%) were third-or-later born children. Coverage of non-NIP vaccines varied by sex and birth order, ranging from 58.2% for first-born boys to 28.4% for third-or-later born girls. Coverage among girls was less than among boys (PR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82-1.00), but the sex differences were not significant after adjusting for sociodemographic factors (PR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03). Compared with first-born children, coverage PRs were 0.85 (0.76-0.93) for second-born children and 0.82 (0.65-1.00) for third-or-later born children (p for trend < 0.001). Sex and birth order had joint effects on coverage, with the lowest coverage PRs in the third-or-later born girls (0.71, 95% CI: 0.49-0.97), compared to first-born boys. Multiplicative interactions of sex and birth order were significant (PR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.98 in second-born girls).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Birth order of children was independently associated with non-NIP vaccines coverage, whereas sex showed no significant. However, sex and birth order were jointly associated with receipt of non-NIP vaccines, with later born children and girls having significantly lower coverage than first-born boys. In the context of the three-child policy in China, interventions to promote non-NIP vaccine equity should consider children's sex and birth order.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065259/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02502-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02502-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了应对不断下降的生育率,中国实施了全面二孩和三孩政策,导致多子女家庭增加。然而,人们对这些政策变化是否以及如何影响非国家免疫规划(non-NIP)疫苗的使用知之甚少。我们评估了性别和出生顺序与中国1-6岁儿童非nip疫苗覆盖率的关系。方法:对浙江省和河南省2022年1-6岁儿童的照顾者进行横断面调查。我们获得了性别、出生顺序、疫苗接种史和家庭社会人口统计信息,并确定了五种常用的婴儿非nip疫苗[b型流感嗜血杆菌(Hib)、水痘、轮状病毒、肠病毒71 (EV71)和13价肺炎球菌(PCV13)疫苗]的摄取情况。如果儿童接种了其中至少三种疫苗的第一剂,就被认为接种了疫苗。使用对数二项回归模型来估计性别和出生顺序与非nip疫苗覆盖率的独立和联合关联的患病率比(pr)和95%置信区间(ci),以及性别和出生顺序的乘法和加性相互作用。结果:共有1611名有父母/监护人陪同的儿童被纳入调查;48.0% (n = 773)为女孩;中位年龄为3.3岁(四分位数范围2.0-4.8);其中头胎824例(51.1%),二胎578例(35.9%),三胎及以上209例(13.0%)。非nip疫苗的覆盖率因性别和出生顺序而异,从第一胎男孩的58.2%到第三胎或更晚出生的女孩的28.4%不等。女孩的覆盖率低于男孩(PR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82-1.00),但在调整社会人口因素后,性别差异不显著(PR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03)。与头胎相比,二胎的覆盖率pr为0.85(0.76-0.93),三胎或三胎后的覆盖率pr为0.82 (0.65-1.00)(p为趋势)。结论:儿童出生顺序与非nip疫苗覆盖率独立相关,性别无显著性差异。然而,性别和出生顺序与接种非nip疫苗有共同关系,较晚出生的儿童和女孩的接种率明显低于第一出生的男孩。在中国实行三孩政策的背景下,促进非nip疫苗公平的干预措施应考虑儿童的性别和出生顺序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Independent and joint associations of sex and birth order with non‑national immunization program vaccine coverage among Chinese children: a cross-sectional analysis.

Background: In response to declining fertility rates, China implemented universal two- and three-child policies, leading to an increase of multi-child families. However, little is known whether and how these policy changes influenced the uptake of non-National Immunization Program (non-NIP) vaccines. We evaluated associations of sex and birth order with non-NIP vaccine coverage in 1-6-year-old children in China.

Methods: Our study was a cross-sectional survey of caregivers of 1-6-year-old children in Zhejiang and Henan Provinces in 2022. We obtained information on sex, birth order, vaccination history, and family socio-demographics and determined uptake of five commonly-used non-NIP vaccines for infants [Haemophilus influenza b (Hib), varicella, rotavirus, enterovirus 71 (EV71), and 13-valent pneumococcal (PCV13) vaccines]. Children were considered vaccinated if they received the first dose of at least three of these vaccines. Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for independent and joint associations of sex and birth order with non-NIP vaccine coverage, and multiplicative and additive interactions of sex and birth order.

Results: A total of 1611 children with accompanying parents/guardians were included in the survey; 48.0% (n = 773) were girls; the median age was 3.3 years (interquartile range 2.0-4.8); and 824 (51.1%) were first-born children, 578 (35.9%) were second-born children, and 209 (13.0%) were third-or-later born children. Coverage of non-NIP vaccines varied by sex and birth order, ranging from 58.2% for first-born boys to 28.4% for third-or-later born girls. Coverage among girls was less than among boys (PR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82-1.00), but the sex differences were not significant after adjusting for sociodemographic factors (PR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03). Compared with first-born children, coverage PRs were 0.85 (0.76-0.93) for second-born children and 0.82 (0.65-1.00) for third-or-later born children (p for trend < 0.001). Sex and birth order had joint effects on coverage, with the lowest coverage PRs in the third-or-later born girls (0.71, 95% CI: 0.49-0.97), compared to first-born boys. Multiplicative interactions of sex and birth order were significant (PR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.98 in second-born girls).

Conclusions: Birth order of children was independently associated with non-NIP vaccines coverage, whereas sex showed no significant. However, sex and birth order were jointly associated with receipt of non-NIP vaccines, with later born children and girls having significantly lower coverage than first-born boys. In the context of the three-child policy in China, interventions to promote non-NIP vaccine equity should consider children's sex and birth order.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信