一个全面的工具,以支持家庭医生和烧伤幸存者提供长期烧伤幸存者护理。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Anna Tian, Stephanie Chan, Marguerite Nolin, Béatrice Hébert, Zoë Edger-Lacoursière, Elisabeth Marois-Pagé, Stephanie Jean, Bernadette Nedelec
{"title":"一个全面的工具,以支持家庭医生和烧伤幸存者提供长期烧伤幸存者护理。","authors":"Anna Tian, Stephanie Chan, Marguerite Nolin, Béatrice Hébert, Zoë Edger-Lacoursière, Elisabeth Marois-Pagé, Stephanie Jean, Bernadette Nedelec","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare professionals increasingly recognize major burn injuries as a chronic condition due to their persistent and long-term health implications. The increasing survival rates and longer lifespans of burn survivors (BS) require general practitioners (GPs) to meet their long-term, potentially complex care. This project investigated the perceived need for a Knowledge Translation (KT) tool, and the content required, to optimize long-term support for BS by making best practices resources more accessible to their GPs. This mixed-method study assessed the perceived needs of BS and the current GP practices regarding BS follow-up. Survey data was gathered from GPs and BS. Additionally, a focus group was held with expert burn care clinicians. The results were analyzed using descriptive quantitative and qualitative methods and the findings triangulated. The common themes revealed the need for information about holistic care for BS across their illness trajectory. 94% of GPs reported a lack of confidence treating BS who wanted information regarding co-morbidities, psychosocial support, and symptom management, particularly related to scars (79-94%). BS reported symptoms which interfere with their daily activities: (i.e. scar-related (75%), pain (57.5%), stiffness (52.5%), weakness (55%), fatigue (65%), psychosocial (55%) and cognitive issues (35%)). The KT tool generation was based on the amalgamated findings. This study revealed a consensus amongst BS, GPs, and expert clinicians that there was a need for a learning resource for GPs to support their role in providing BS long-term follow-up care. The resulting KT tool will enable GPs to bridge their knowledge gaps through user-friendly links to BS-relevant resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comprehensive Tool to Support Family Physicians and Burn Survivors in the Provision of Long-term Burn Survivor Care.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Tian, Stephanie Chan, Marguerite Nolin, Béatrice Hébert, Zoë Edger-Lacoursière, Elisabeth Marois-Pagé, Stephanie Jean, Bernadette Nedelec\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Healthcare professionals increasingly recognize major burn injuries as a chronic condition due to their persistent and long-term health implications. The increasing survival rates and longer lifespans of burn survivors (BS) require general practitioners (GPs) to meet their long-term, potentially complex care. This project investigated the perceived need for a Knowledge Translation (KT) tool, and the content required, to optimize long-term support for BS by making best practices resources more accessible to their GPs. This mixed-method study assessed the perceived needs of BS and the current GP practices regarding BS follow-up. Survey data was gathered from GPs and BS. Additionally, a focus group was held with expert burn care clinicians. The results were analyzed using descriptive quantitative and qualitative methods and the findings triangulated. The common themes revealed the need for information about holistic care for BS across their illness trajectory. 94% of GPs reported a lack of confidence treating BS who wanted information regarding co-morbidities, psychosocial support, and symptom management, particularly related to scars (79-94%). BS reported symptoms which interfere with their daily activities: (i.e. scar-related (75%), pain (57.5%), stiffness (52.5%), weakness (55%), fatigue (65%), psychosocial (55%) and cognitive issues (35%)). The KT tool generation was based on the amalgamated findings. This study revealed a consensus amongst BS, GPs, and expert clinicians that there was a need for a learning resource for GPs to support their role in providing BS long-term follow-up care. The resulting KT tool will enable GPs to bridge their knowledge gaps through user-friendly links to BS-relevant resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf062\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健专业人员越来越多地认识到,由于其持续和长期的健康影响,严重烧伤是一种慢性疾病。随着烧伤幸存者(BS)存活率的提高和寿命的延长,全科医生(gp)需要满足他们长期的、潜在的复杂护理。该项目调查了对知识翻译(KT)工具的感知需求,以及所需的内容,通过使其全科医生更容易获得最佳实践资源来优化对BS的长期支持。这项混合方法研究评估了BS的感知需求和当前全科医生关于BS随访的实践。调查数据收集自gp和BS。此外,与专家烧伤护理临床医生举行了焦点小组。使用描述性定量和定性方法对结果进行分析,并对结果进行三角剖分。共同的主题揭示了对整个疾病轨迹的BS整体护理信息的需求。94%的全科医生报告说,在治疗BS时缺乏信心,他们想要了解合共病、社会心理支持和症状管理的信息,特别是与疤痕有关的信息(79-94%)。BS报告的干扰其日常活动的症状:(即疤痕相关(75%)、疼痛(57.5%)、僵硬(52.5%)、虚弱(55%)、疲劳(65%)、社会心理(55%)和认知问题(35%))。KT工具的生成是基于合并的发现。本研究揭示了BS、全科医生和专家临床医生之间的共识,即需要为全科医生提供学习资源,以支持他们在提供BS长期随访护理方面的作用。由此产生的KT工具将使全科医生能够通过用户友好的链接到bs相关资源来弥补他们的知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comprehensive Tool to Support Family Physicians and Burn Survivors in the Provision of Long-term Burn Survivor Care.

Healthcare professionals increasingly recognize major burn injuries as a chronic condition due to their persistent and long-term health implications. The increasing survival rates and longer lifespans of burn survivors (BS) require general practitioners (GPs) to meet their long-term, potentially complex care. This project investigated the perceived need for a Knowledge Translation (KT) tool, and the content required, to optimize long-term support for BS by making best practices resources more accessible to their GPs. This mixed-method study assessed the perceived needs of BS and the current GP practices regarding BS follow-up. Survey data was gathered from GPs and BS. Additionally, a focus group was held with expert burn care clinicians. The results were analyzed using descriptive quantitative and qualitative methods and the findings triangulated. The common themes revealed the need for information about holistic care for BS across their illness trajectory. 94% of GPs reported a lack of confidence treating BS who wanted information regarding co-morbidities, psychosocial support, and symptom management, particularly related to scars (79-94%). BS reported symptoms which interfere with their daily activities: (i.e. scar-related (75%), pain (57.5%), stiffness (52.5%), weakness (55%), fatigue (65%), psychosocial (55%) and cognitive issues (35%)). The KT tool generation was based on the amalgamated findings. This study revealed a consensus amongst BS, GPs, and expert clinicians that there was a need for a learning resource for GPs to support their role in providing BS long-term follow-up care. The resulting KT tool will enable GPs to bridge their knowledge gaps through user-friendly links to BS-relevant resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信