卧床时间与硬脊膜内手术后脑脊液泄漏的发展:一项比较研究的荟萃分析

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alberto Benato, Fabio Zeoli, Flavia Beccia, Marco Battistelli, Alessandro Rapisarda, Alessandro Olivi, Filippo M Polli
{"title":"卧床时间与硬脊膜内手术后脑脊液泄漏的发展:一项比较研究的荟萃分析","authors":"Alberto Benato, Fabio Zeoli, Flavia Beccia, Marco Battistelli, Alessandro Rapisarda, Alessandro Olivi, Filippo M Polli","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06470-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and related complications are a major concern after intradural spinal surgeries. The role of prolonged bed rest in reducing the incidence of these complications has been debated. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether early versus late mobilization affects the incidence of CSF leak-related complications (CLRC) after intradural spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on early ambulation (EA) versus prolonged bed rest (PBR) in patients undergoing intradural spinal surgery. Studied considered for inclusion defined EA as mobilization on postoperative day 1, while PBR as mobilization on postoperative day 3. The primary outcome was the incidence of CLRC, defined as pseudomeningocele, durocutaneous fistula, or wound dehiscence. Secondary outcome was the incidence of medical complications.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Three retrospective comparative studies with a total of 949 patients were included in the analysis. No significant difference was found in the incidence of CLRC between the EA and PBR groups. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and postoperative medical complications incidence were significantly lower in the EA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis found that EA does not increase the risk of CLRC compared to PBR, while shortening LOS and reducing medical complications occurrence. These findings suggest that early mobilization could be a safe and effective postoperative strategy, reducing hospital stay and complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":"69 2","pages":"210-217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bed rest duration and development of cerebrospinal fluid leaks after intradural spinal surgery: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Benato, Fabio Zeoli, Flavia Beccia, Marco Battistelli, Alessandro Rapisarda, Alessandro Olivi, Filippo M Polli\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06470-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and related complications are a major concern after intradural spinal surgeries. The role of prolonged bed rest in reducing the incidence of these complications has been debated. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether early versus late mobilization affects the incidence of CSF leak-related complications (CLRC) after intradural spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on early ambulation (EA) versus prolonged bed rest (PBR) in patients undergoing intradural spinal surgery. Studied considered for inclusion defined EA as mobilization on postoperative day 1, while PBR as mobilization on postoperative day 3. The primary outcome was the incidence of CLRC, defined as pseudomeningocele, durocutaneous fistula, or wound dehiscence. Secondary outcome was the incidence of medical complications.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Three retrospective comparative studies with a total of 949 patients were included in the analysis. No significant difference was found in the incidence of CLRC between the EA and PBR groups. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and postoperative medical complications incidence were significantly lower in the EA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis found that EA does not increase the risk of CLRC compared to PBR, while shortening LOS and reducing medical complications occurrence. These findings suggest that early mobilization could be a safe and effective postoperative strategy, reducing hospital stay and complication rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"volume\":\"69 2\",\"pages\":\"210-217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06470-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06470-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:术后脑脊液(CSF)泄漏及相关并发症是硬脊膜内手术后的主要问题。长期卧床休息在减少这些并发症发生率方面的作用一直存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估早期和晚期活动是否会影响硬脊膜内手术后脑脊液泄漏相关并发症(CLRC)的发生率。证据获取:根据PRISMA指南,我们对硬膜内脊柱手术患者早期下床(EA)与长时间卧床(PBR)的比较研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。考虑纳入的研究将EA定义为术后第1天的活动,而PBR定义为术后第3天的活动。主要结果是CLRC的发生率,定义为假性脑膜膨出、硬皮瘘或伤口裂开。次要结局是医疗并发症的发生率。证据综合:3项回顾性比较研究共纳入949例患者。EA组和PBR组之间的CLRC发生率无显著差异。EA组住院时间(LOS)和术后并发症发生率均显著降低。结论:本荟萃分析发现,与PBR相比,EA不会增加CLRC的风险,但会缩短LOS并减少医疗并发症的发生。这些发现表明,早期活动可能是一种安全有效的术后策略,可减少住院时间和并发症发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bed rest duration and development of cerebrospinal fluid leaks after intradural spinal surgery: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Introduction: Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and related complications are a major concern after intradural spinal surgeries. The role of prolonged bed rest in reducing the incidence of these complications has been debated. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether early versus late mobilization affects the incidence of CSF leak-related complications (CLRC) after intradural spinal surgery.

Evidence acquisition: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on early ambulation (EA) versus prolonged bed rest (PBR) in patients undergoing intradural spinal surgery. Studied considered for inclusion defined EA as mobilization on postoperative day 1, while PBR as mobilization on postoperative day 3. The primary outcome was the incidence of CLRC, defined as pseudomeningocele, durocutaneous fistula, or wound dehiscence. Secondary outcome was the incidence of medical complications.

Evidence synthesis: Three retrospective comparative studies with a total of 949 patients were included in the analysis. No significant difference was found in the incidence of CLRC between the EA and PBR groups. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and postoperative medical complications incidence were significantly lower in the EA group.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis found that EA does not increase the risk of CLRC compared to PBR, while shortening LOS and reducing medical complications occurrence. These findings suggest that early mobilization could be a safe and effective postoperative strategy, reducing hospital stay and complication rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信