{"title":"“不被亚里士多德的论证所吓倒”:1265年一篇被遗忘的书信体论文中的视差和彗星距离。","authors":"C Philipp E Nothaft","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2025.2495796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A manuscript now in Bamberg preserves the only surviving fragment of a thirteenth-century treatise on comets or 'new stars', which was written as a letter addressed by an unknown Dominican author to the Master General of his order, John of Vercelli. The present article offers the first discussion of this forgotten work, which was composed in the year after the Great Comet of 1264. Although most of the text has been lost, the inclusion of a geometrical diagram in the manuscript makes it possible to reconstruct a crucial part of its overall argument. The Dominican author was openly critical of the Aristotelian doctrine of comets as atmospheric phenomena and considered the possibility that reliable distance estimates might instead place such objects in the celestial realm. His geometrical investigation of this question is historically significant for containing the earliest known analysis of the effect of cometary distance on its observable parallax, thus anticipating aspects of Johannes Regiomontanus's seminal <i>16 Problems</i> on comets.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Undeterred by Aristotle's demonstrations': parallax and cometary distance in a forgotten epistolary treatise of 1265.\",\"authors\":\"C Philipp E Nothaft\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00033790.2025.2495796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A manuscript now in Bamberg preserves the only surviving fragment of a thirteenth-century treatise on comets or 'new stars', which was written as a letter addressed by an unknown Dominican author to the Master General of his order, John of Vercelli. The present article offers the first discussion of this forgotten work, which was composed in the year after the Great Comet of 1264. Although most of the text has been lost, the inclusion of a geometrical diagram in the manuscript makes it possible to reconstruct a crucial part of its overall argument. The Dominican author was openly critical of the Aristotelian doctrine of comets as atmospheric phenomena and considered the possibility that reliable distance estimates might instead place such objects in the celestial realm. His geometrical investigation of this question is historically significant for containing the earliest known analysis of the effect of cometary distance on its observable parallax, thus anticipating aspects of Johannes Regiomontanus's seminal <i>16 Problems</i> on comets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2025.2495796\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2025.2495796","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
'Undeterred by Aristotle's demonstrations': parallax and cometary distance in a forgotten epistolary treatise of 1265.
A manuscript now in Bamberg preserves the only surviving fragment of a thirteenth-century treatise on comets or 'new stars', which was written as a letter addressed by an unknown Dominican author to the Master General of his order, John of Vercelli. The present article offers the first discussion of this forgotten work, which was composed in the year after the Great Comet of 1264. Although most of the text has been lost, the inclusion of a geometrical diagram in the manuscript makes it possible to reconstruct a crucial part of its overall argument. The Dominican author was openly critical of the Aristotelian doctrine of comets as atmospheric phenomena and considered the possibility that reliable distance estimates might instead place such objects in the celestial realm. His geometrical investigation of this question is historically significant for containing the earliest known analysis of the effect of cometary distance on its observable parallax, thus anticipating aspects of Johannes Regiomontanus's seminal 16 Problems on comets.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Science , launched in 1936, publishes work on the history of science, technology and medicine, covering developments from classical antiquity to the late 20th century. The Journal has a global reach, both in terms of the work that it publishes, and also in terms of its readership. The editors particularly welcome submissions from authors in Asia, Africa and South America.
Each issue contains research articles, and a comprehensive book reviews section, including essay reviews on a group of books on a broader level. Articles are published in both English and French, and the Journal welcomes proposals for special issues on relevant topics.
The Editors and Publisher are committed to supporting early career researchers, and award an annual prize to the best submission from current doctoral students, or those awarded a doctorate in the past four years.