“不被亚里士多德的论证所吓倒”:1265年一篇被遗忘的书信体论文中的视差和彗星距离。

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
C Philipp E Nothaft
{"title":"“不被亚里士多德的论证所吓倒”:1265年一篇被遗忘的书信体论文中的视差和彗星距离。","authors":"C Philipp E Nothaft","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2025.2495796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A manuscript now in Bamberg preserves the only surviving fragment of a thirteenth-century treatise on comets or 'new stars', which was written as a letter addressed by an unknown Dominican author to the Master General of his order, John of Vercelli. The present article offers the first discussion of this forgotten work, which was composed in the year after the Great Comet of 1264. Although most of the text has been lost, the inclusion of a geometrical diagram in the manuscript makes it possible to reconstruct a crucial part of its overall argument. The Dominican author was openly critical of the Aristotelian doctrine of comets as atmospheric phenomena and considered the possibility that reliable distance estimates might instead place such objects in the celestial realm. His geometrical investigation of this question is historically significant for containing the earliest known analysis of the effect of cometary distance on its observable parallax, thus anticipating aspects of Johannes Regiomontanus's seminal <i>16 Problems</i> on comets.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Undeterred by Aristotle's demonstrations': parallax and cometary distance in a forgotten epistolary treatise of 1265.\",\"authors\":\"C Philipp E Nothaft\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00033790.2025.2495796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A manuscript now in Bamberg preserves the only surviving fragment of a thirteenth-century treatise on comets or 'new stars', which was written as a letter addressed by an unknown Dominican author to the Master General of his order, John of Vercelli. The present article offers the first discussion of this forgotten work, which was composed in the year after the Great Comet of 1264. Although most of the text has been lost, the inclusion of a geometrical diagram in the manuscript makes it possible to reconstruct a crucial part of its overall argument. The Dominican author was openly critical of the Aristotelian doctrine of comets as atmospheric phenomena and considered the possibility that reliable distance estimates might instead place such objects in the celestial realm. His geometrical investigation of this question is historically significant for containing the earliest known analysis of the effect of cometary distance on its observable parallax, thus anticipating aspects of Johannes Regiomontanus's seminal <i>16 Problems</i> on comets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2025.2495796\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2025.2495796","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

班贝格现存的一份手稿保存了一篇13世纪关于彗星或“新星”的论文的唯一幸存的片段,这是一封由一位不知名的多米尼加作家写给他的骑士团总会长约翰·维切利的信。这篇文章提供了对这部被遗忘的作品的第一次讨论,它是在1264年大彗星之后的一年完成的。虽然大部分文本已经丢失,但手稿中包含的几何图使得重建其整体论点的关键部分成为可能。这位多米尼加作家公开批评亚里士多德关于彗星是大气现象的学说,并认为可靠的距离估计可能会将这些天体置于天体领域。他对这个问题的几何学研究具有重要的历史意义,因为它包含了已知最早的关于彗星距离对可观测视差影响的分析,从而预测了约翰内斯·雷吉蒙塔努斯关于彗星的开创性问题的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Undeterred by Aristotle's demonstrations': parallax and cometary distance in a forgotten epistolary treatise of 1265.

A manuscript now in Bamberg preserves the only surviving fragment of a thirteenth-century treatise on comets or 'new stars', which was written as a letter addressed by an unknown Dominican author to the Master General of his order, John of Vercelli. The present article offers the first discussion of this forgotten work, which was composed in the year after the Great Comet of 1264. Although most of the text has been lost, the inclusion of a geometrical diagram in the manuscript makes it possible to reconstruct a crucial part of its overall argument. The Dominican author was openly critical of the Aristotelian doctrine of comets as atmospheric phenomena and considered the possibility that reliable distance estimates might instead place such objects in the celestial realm. His geometrical investigation of this question is historically significant for containing the earliest known analysis of the effect of cometary distance on its observable parallax, thus anticipating aspects of Johannes Regiomontanus's seminal 16 Problems on comets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Science
Annals of Science 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Science , launched in 1936, publishes work on the history of science, technology and medicine, covering developments from classical antiquity to the late 20th century. The Journal has a global reach, both in terms of the work that it publishes, and also in terms of its readership. The editors particularly welcome submissions from authors in Asia, Africa and South America. Each issue contains research articles, and a comprehensive book reviews section, including essay reviews on a group of books on a broader level. Articles are published in both English and French, and the Journal welcomes proposals for special issues on relevant topics. The Editors and Publisher are committed to supporting early career researchers, and award an annual prize to the best submission from current doctoral students, or those awarded a doctorate in the past four years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信