Heun Min, Noraliz Garcia-O'Farrill, Patricia Garcia, Andrew Thomson, Allan A Hunter
{"title":"微切口玻璃体切除术(MIVS)后的前瞻性远程医疗术后方案。","authors":"Heun Min, Noraliz Garcia-O'Farrill, Patricia Garcia, Andrew Thomson, Allan A Hunter","doi":"10.1080/02713683.2025.2490768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Retrospective studies show a low proportion of postoperative (PO) complications or alterations in management after Microincision Vitrectomy Surgery (MIVS). To our knowledge, this is the first prospective analysis of a telemedicine alternative to the standard practice for PO visits after MIVS. The purpose of this study is to evaluate telemedicine for the management of postoperative visits (POV) following MIVS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ongoing randomized, prospective study with 53 patients assigned (1:1) to two arms of POV schedules including Virtual Telemedicine visits (VT) <i>vs.</i> In-person Telemedicine (IP) visits. POV schedules in both groups included visits on the same day after surgery and week(s) 1, 2, 8, and 12. Complete exams with visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and dilated fundus exams of the operative eye were performed by the retina surgeon on day 0, weeks 2 and 12 in both groups. Protocolized focused undilated exams on weeks 1 and 8 either remotely (VT group) or in-person (IP group). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests between groups using Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary outcome, mean POV logMAR BCVA, showed no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i>-value = 0.70) between VT and IP groups. Other pre- and post-surgical comparisons (e.g. IOP, RNFL score) showed no statistical differences. No post-surgical complications have been noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telemedicine-assisted POV may be a safe and convenient alternative for patients undergoing uncomplicated MIVS, but additional and larger studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10782,"journal":{"name":"Current Eye Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Telemedicine Postoperative Protocol Following Microincision Vitrectomy Surgery (MIVS).\",\"authors\":\"Heun Min, Noraliz Garcia-O'Farrill, Patricia Garcia, Andrew Thomson, Allan A Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02713683.2025.2490768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Retrospective studies show a low proportion of postoperative (PO) complications or alterations in management after Microincision Vitrectomy Surgery (MIVS). To our knowledge, this is the first prospective analysis of a telemedicine alternative to the standard practice for PO visits after MIVS. The purpose of this study is to evaluate telemedicine for the management of postoperative visits (POV) following MIVS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ongoing randomized, prospective study with 53 patients assigned (1:1) to two arms of POV schedules including Virtual Telemedicine visits (VT) <i>vs.</i> In-person Telemedicine (IP) visits. POV schedules in both groups included visits on the same day after surgery and week(s) 1, 2, 8, and 12. Complete exams with visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and dilated fundus exams of the operative eye were performed by the retina surgeon on day 0, weeks 2 and 12 in both groups. Protocolized focused undilated exams on weeks 1 and 8 either remotely (VT group) or in-person (IP group). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests between groups using Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary outcome, mean POV logMAR BCVA, showed no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i>-value = 0.70) between VT and IP groups. Other pre- and post-surgical comparisons (e.g. IOP, RNFL score) showed no statistical differences. No post-surgical complications have been noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telemedicine-assisted POV may be a safe and convenient alternative for patients undergoing uncomplicated MIVS, but additional and larger studies are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Eye Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Eye Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2025.2490768\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2025.2490768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prospective Telemedicine Postoperative Protocol Following Microincision Vitrectomy Surgery (MIVS).
Purpose: Retrospective studies show a low proportion of postoperative (PO) complications or alterations in management after Microincision Vitrectomy Surgery (MIVS). To our knowledge, this is the first prospective analysis of a telemedicine alternative to the standard practice for PO visits after MIVS. The purpose of this study is to evaluate telemedicine for the management of postoperative visits (POV) following MIVS.
Methods: Ongoing randomized, prospective study with 53 patients assigned (1:1) to two arms of POV schedules including Virtual Telemedicine visits (VT) vs. In-person Telemedicine (IP) visits. POV schedules in both groups included visits on the same day after surgery and week(s) 1, 2, 8, and 12. Complete exams with visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and dilated fundus exams of the operative eye were performed by the retina surgeon on day 0, weeks 2 and 12 in both groups. Protocolized focused undilated exams on weeks 1 and 8 either remotely (VT group) or in-person (IP group). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests between groups using Microsoft Excel.
Results: Primary outcome, mean POV logMAR BCVA, showed no statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.70) between VT and IP groups. Other pre- and post-surgical comparisons (e.g. IOP, RNFL score) showed no statistical differences. No post-surgical complications have been noted.
Conclusions: Telemedicine-assisted POV may be a safe and convenient alternative for patients undergoing uncomplicated MIVS, but additional and larger studies are needed.
期刊介绍:
The principal aim of Current Eye Research is to provide rapid publication of full papers, short communications and mini-reviews, all high quality. Current Eye Research publishes articles encompassing all the areas of eye research. Subject areas include the following: clinical research, anatomy, physiology, biophysics, biochemistry, pharmacology, developmental biology, microbiology and immunology.