Srinivas Srinidhi Vadlapudi, Ujjal Poddar, Anshu Srivastava, Moinak Sen Sarma
{"title":"家庭与医院聚乙二醇去除对儿童功能性便秘的疗效:一项随机对照研究","authors":"Srinivas Srinidhi Vadlapudi, Ujjal Poddar, Anshu Srivastava, Moinak Sen Sarma","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-09048-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Functional constipation (FC) is the most common cause of childhood constipation. Children with FC and fecal impaction need to undergo disimpaction. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is commonly used for disimpaction either in a hospital setting as a continuous lavage or in a home-based setting over 3-6 days. Randomized control trials comparing the two regimens are not available. The study objectives were to compare the efficacy, side effects, cost-effectiveness, and parental satisfaction of home- and hospital-based disimpaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive children attending our hospital (age: 1-18 years) and diagnosed to have FC as per ROME IV and requiring disimpaction were enrolled. Fecal impaction was established clinically (per-abdomen or per-rectal examination) or radiologically (X-ray abdomen- Barr criteria). Stratified block randomization was done. PEG was administered accordingly in a hospital-based or a home-based setting. The side effects, patient acceptability as per the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medications (TSQM) and cost incurred were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fifteen children (hospital-based [n = 58], home-based [n = 57]) were enrolled. Successful disimpaction in hospital- and home-based disimpaction arm was 100% and 94.7%, respectively (p = 0.12). Vomiting (27.6% vs 5.3%, p = 0.001) and abdominal distension (31% vs 3.5%, p < 0.001) were higher in patients undergoing hospital-based disimpaction. Cost of treatment was higher in hospital-based disimpaction arm (INR 6,250 [2,228-15,585] vs INR 3,355 [850-18,350], p = < 0.001). Parental satisfaction was greater in home-based disimpaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Home-based disimpaction using PEG is as effective as hospital-based disimpaction. Disimpaction in a friendlier home environment, at a lower cost and with fewer side effects makes home-based disimpaction preferable in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Home-Based Versus Hospital-Based Disimpaction with Polyethylene Glycol in Pediatric Functional Constipation: A Randomized Control Study.\",\"authors\":\"Srinivas Srinidhi Vadlapudi, Ujjal Poddar, Anshu Srivastava, Moinak Sen Sarma\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-025-09048-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Functional constipation (FC) is the most common cause of childhood constipation. Children with FC and fecal impaction need to undergo disimpaction. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is commonly used for disimpaction either in a hospital setting as a continuous lavage or in a home-based setting over 3-6 days. Randomized control trials comparing the two regimens are not available. The study objectives were to compare the efficacy, side effects, cost-effectiveness, and parental satisfaction of home- and hospital-based disimpaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive children attending our hospital (age: 1-18 years) and diagnosed to have FC as per ROME IV and requiring disimpaction were enrolled. Fecal impaction was established clinically (per-abdomen or per-rectal examination) or radiologically (X-ray abdomen- Barr criteria). Stratified block randomization was done. PEG was administered accordingly in a hospital-based or a home-based setting. The side effects, patient acceptability as per the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medications (TSQM) and cost incurred were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fifteen children (hospital-based [n = 58], home-based [n = 57]) were enrolled. Successful disimpaction in hospital- and home-based disimpaction arm was 100% and 94.7%, respectively (p = 0.12). Vomiting (27.6% vs 5.3%, p = 0.001) and abdominal distension (31% vs 3.5%, p < 0.001) were higher in patients undergoing hospital-based disimpaction. Cost of treatment was higher in hospital-based disimpaction arm (INR 6,250 [2,228-15,585] vs INR 3,355 [850-18,350], p = < 0.001). Parental satisfaction was greater in home-based disimpaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Home-based disimpaction using PEG is as effective as hospital-based disimpaction. Disimpaction in a friendlier home environment, at a lower cost and with fewer side effects makes home-based disimpaction preferable in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09048-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09048-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of Home-Based Versus Hospital-Based Disimpaction with Polyethylene Glycol in Pediatric Functional Constipation: A Randomized Control Study.
Background/aims: Functional constipation (FC) is the most common cause of childhood constipation. Children with FC and fecal impaction need to undergo disimpaction. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is commonly used for disimpaction either in a hospital setting as a continuous lavage or in a home-based setting over 3-6 days. Randomized control trials comparing the two regimens are not available. The study objectives were to compare the efficacy, side effects, cost-effectiveness, and parental satisfaction of home- and hospital-based disimpaction.
Methods: Consecutive children attending our hospital (age: 1-18 years) and diagnosed to have FC as per ROME IV and requiring disimpaction were enrolled. Fecal impaction was established clinically (per-abdomen or per-rectal examination) or radiologically (X-ray abdomen- Barr criteria). Stratified block randomization was done. PEG was administered accordingly in a hospital-based or a home-based setting. The side effects, patient acceptability as per the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medications (TSQM) and cost incurred were noted.
Results: One hundred and fifteen children (hospital-based [n = 58], home-based [n = 57]) were enrolled. Successful disimpaction in hospital- and home-based disimpaction arm was 100% and 94.7%, respectively (p = 0.12). Vomiting (27.6% vs 5.3%, p = 0.001) and abdominal distension (31% vs 3.5%, p < 0.001) were higher in patients undergoing hospital-based disimpaction. Cost of treatment was higher in hospital-based disimpaction arm (INR 6,250 [2,228-15,585] vs INR 3,355 [850-18,350], p = < 0.001). Parental satisfaction was greater in home-based disimpaction.
Conclusions: Home-based disimpaction using PEG is as effective as hospital-based disimpaction. Disimpaction in a friendlier home environment, at a lower cost and with fewer side effects makes home-based disimpaction preferable in children.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.