妊娠期间联合骨骺松解会影响产科结局吗?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hila Shalev-Ram, Yael Rosental, Gal Cohen, Hanoch Schriber, Michal Kovo, Tal Biron-Shental, Gil Shechter-Maor
{"title":"妊娠期间联合骨骺松解会影响产科结局吗?","authors":"Hila Shalev-Ram, Yael Rosental, Gal Cohen, Hanoch Schriber, Michal Kovo, Tal Biron-Shental, Gil Shechter-Maor","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Symphysiolysis Is Often Experienced by Pregnant Women and Is Known to Cause Considerable Pain and Occasional Anxiety. However, Information on Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes Is Limited. Our Objective Was to Compare Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes, and Labor Characteristics, between Women with or without Symphysiolysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included all women with singleton pregnancies without previous cesarean delivery who attempted vaginal delivery at ≥37 weeks in a tertiary hospital from 2013 to 2021. The cohort was divided into women diagnosed with symphysiolysis during pregnancy and a control group of women without the diagnosis. Maternal and delivery characteristics, as well as obstetric and neonatal adverse outcomes were compared between the groups. Nulliparous and multiparous women were analyzed separately. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated, controlling for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 557 nulliparous and 27 477 multiparous women were included. Among them, 233 (1.5%) nulliparous and 515 (1.9%) multiparous women had a diagnosis of symphysiolysis. As compared with controls, women with symphysiolysis tended to be younger (27.5 ± 4.4 vs. 28.5 ± 5.0 years, P = 0.002 for nulliparous, 31.1 ± 4.9 vs. 32.2 ± 4.8 years, P < 0.001 for multiparous), have higher body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) prior to pregnancy (25.0 ± 5.2 vs. 23.5 ± 5.0, P < 0.001 and 25.3 ± 5.5 vs. 25.3 ± 5.5, P < 0.001, respectively), and a higher prevalence of smoking during pregnancy (7.3% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.036, and 9.3% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001, respectively). There were no between-group differences in obstetric outcomes, including second stage of labor duration, rate of vacuum extraction, cesarean delivery, perineal laceration, or adverse neonatal outcome. Moreover, there were no significant differences observed between the groups in terms of rates of Apgar scores <7 at 5 min, arterial pH <7.1, or admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of obstetrical or neonatal complications during labor for individuals with symphysiolysis are not increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does symphysiolysis during pregnancy affect obstetric outcomes?\",\"authors\":\"Hila Shalev-Ram, Yael Rosental, Gal Cohen, Hanoch Schriber, Michal Kovo, Tal Biron-Shental, Gil Shechter-Maor\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.70178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Symphysiolysis Is Often Experienced by Pregnant Women and Is Known to Cause Considerable Pain and Occasional Anxiety. However, Information on Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes Is Limited. Our Objective Was to Compare Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes, and Labor Characteristics, between Women with or without Symphysiolysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included all women with singleton pregnancies without previous cesarean delivery who attempted vaginal delivery at ≥37 weeks in a tertiary hospital from 2013 to 2021. The cohort was divided into women diagnosed with symphysiolysis during pregnancy and a control group of women without the diagnosis. Maternal and delivery characteristics, as well as obstetric and neonatal adverse outcomes were compared between the groups. Nulliparous and multiparous women were analyzed separately. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated, controlling for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 557 nulliparous and 27 477 multiparous women were included. Among them, 233 (1.5%) nulliparous and 515 (1.9%) multiparous women had a diagnosis of symphysiolysis. As compared with controls, women with symphysiolysis tended to be younger (27.5 ± 4.4 vs. 28.5 ± 5.0 years, P = 0.002 for nulliparous, 31.1 ± 4.9 vs. 32.2 ± 4.8 years, P < 0.001 for multiparous), have higher body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) prior to pregnancy (25.0 ± 5.2 vs. 23.5 ± 5.0, P < 0.001 and 25.3 ± 5.5 vs. 25.3 ± 5.5, P < 0.001, respectively), and a higher prevalence of smoking during pregnancy (7.3% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.036, and 9.3% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001, respectively). There were no between-group differences in obstetric outcomes, including second stage of labor duration, rate of vacuum extraction, cesarean delivery, perineal laceration, or adverse neonatal outcome. Moreover, there were no significant differences observed between the groups in terms of rates of Apgar scores <7 at 5 min, arterial pH <7.1, or admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of obstetrical or neonatal complications during labor for individuals with symphysiolysis are not increased.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70178\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:联合骨关节溶解是孕妇经常经历的,并且已知会引起相当大的疼痛和偶尔的焦虑。然而,关于产科和新生儿结局的信息有限。我们的目的是比较有或没有联合骨骺松解的妇女的产科和新生儿结局以及分娩特征。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入2013年至2021年在三级医院尝试阴道分娩≥37周且未剖宫产的单胎妊娠妇女。该队列分为妊娠期诊断为联合骨骺松解的妇女和未诊断为联合骨骺松解的对照组。比较两组之间的产妇和分娩特征以及产科和新生儿不良结局。未产和多产妇女分别进行分析。以95%置信区间计算校正优势比,控制混杂变量。结果:共纳入无产妇女15 557例,多产妇女27 477例。其中233例(1.5%)未产妇女和515例(1.9%)多产妇女被诊断为联合骨骺松解。与对照组相比,联合骨骺松解的妇女倾向于年轻化(27.5±4.4岁vs 28.5±5.0岁,未产者P = 0.002, 31.1±4.9岁vs 32.2±4.8岁)。结论:联合骨骺松解患者分娩时产科或新生儿并发症的风险没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does symphysiolysis during pregnancy affect obstetric outcomes?

Objective: Symphysiolysis Is Often Experienced by Pregnant Women and Is Known to Cause Considerable Pain and Occasional Anxiety. However, Information on Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes Is Limited. Our Objective Was to Compare Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes, and Labor Characteristics, between Women with or without Symphysiolysis.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all women with singleton pregnancies without previous cesarean delivery who attempted vaginal delivery at ≥37 weeks in a tertiary hospital from 2013 to 2021. The cohort was divided into women diagnosed with symphysiolysis during pregnancy and a control group of women without the diagnosis. Maternal and delivery characteristics, as well as obstetric and neonatal adverse outcomes were compared between the groups. Nulliparous and multiparous women were analyzed separately. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated, controlling for confounding variables.

Results: A total of 15 557 nulliparous and 27 477 multiparous women were included. Among them, 233 (1.5%) nulliparous and 515 (1.9%) multiparous women had a diagnosis of symphysiolysis. As compared with controls, women with symphysiolysis tended to be younger (27.5 ± 4.4 vs. 28.5 ± 5.0 years, P = 0.002 for nulliparous, 31.1 ± 4.9 vs. 32.2 ± 4.8 years, P < 0.001 for multiparous), have higher body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) prior to pregnancy (25.0 ± 5.2 vs. 23.5 ± 5.0, P < 0.001 and 25.3 ± 5.5 vs. 25.3 ± 5.5, P < 0.001, respectively), and a higher prevalence of smoking during pregnancy (7.3% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.036, and 9.3% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001, respectively). There were no between-group differences in obstetric outcomes, including second stage of labor duration, rate of vacuum extraction, cesarean delivery, perineal laceration, or adverse neonatal outcome. Moreover, there were no significant differences observed between the groups in terms of rates of Apgar scores <7 at 5 min, arterial pH <7.1, or admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit.

Conclusion: The risk of obstetrical or neonatal complications during labor for individuals with symphysiolysis are not increased.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信