钾竞争酸阻滞剂对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双重抗血小板治疗患者上消化道出血的影响:一项全国队列研究。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Minyoul Baik, Jimin Jeon, Joonsang Yoo, Jinkwon Kim
{"title":"钾竞争酸阻滞剂对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双重抗血小板治疗患者上消化道出血的影响:一项全国队列研究。","authors":"Minyoul Baik, Jimin Jeon, Joonsang Yoo, Jinkwon Kim","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the drug of choice to prevent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT); however, unmet needs remain. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are novel acid-suppressive drugs that have emerged as potential alternatives. We evaluated the effectiveness of P-CAB in reducing the risk of UGI bleeding in patients receiving DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients with PCI on DAPT between January 2019 and January 2023 using the Korean nationwide health claims database. The primary outcome was admission for UGI bleeding within 6 months of PCI. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to evaluate UGI bleeding risk based on PPIs and P-CAB use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 210 447 patients who underwent PCI on DAPT (mean age, 65.5 years; 74.7% men), 4.6% and 47.5% patients were prescribed P-CABs and PPIs, respectively. Overall, 0.3% of patients experienced UGI bleeding within 6 months of PCI. P-CAB users had a reduced risk of UGI bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.92; p = 0.019) compared with patients not receiving P-CAB or PPI. No significant difference was observed between the P-CAB and PPI users (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among Korean patients undergoing PCI with DAPT, P-CABs reduced UGI bleeding comparably to PPIs. These findings suggest that P-CABs are potential alternatives to PPIs for preventing UGI bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers on Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Minyoul Baik, Jimin Jeon, Joonsang Yoo, Jinkwon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgh.16989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the drug of choice to prevent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT); however, unmet needs remain. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are novel acid-suppressive drugs that have emerged as potential alternatives. We evaluated the effectiveness of P-CAB in reducing the risk of UGI bleeding in patients receiving DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients with PCI on DAPT between January 2019 and January 2023 using the Korean nationwide health claims database. The primary outcome was admission for UGI bleeding within 6 months of PCI. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to evaluate UGI bleeding risk based on PPIs and P-CAB use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 210 447 patients who underwent PCI on DAPT (mean age, 65.5 years; 74.7% men), 4.6% and 47.5% patients were prescribed P-CABs and PPIs, respectively. Overall, 0.3% of patients experienced UGI bleeding within 6 months of PCI. P-CAB users had a reduced risk of UGI bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.92; p = 0.019) compared with patients not receiving P-CAB or PPI. No significant difference was observed between the P-CAB and PPI users (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among Korean patients undergoing PCI with DAPT, P-CABs reduced UGI bleeding comparably to PPIs. These findings suggest that P-CABs are potential alternatives to PPIs for preventing UGI bleeding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16989\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16989","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)是预防双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)患者上消化道(UGI)出血的首选药物;然而,未满足的需求仍然存在。钾竞争性酸阻滞剂(p - cab)是一种新型的抑酸药物,已成为潜在的替代品。我们评估了P-CAB降低经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后接受DAPT患者UGI出血风险的有效性。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2019年1月至2023年1月期间接受DAPT PCI治疗的患者,使用韩国全国健康声明数据库。主要终点是PCI术后6个月内因UGI出血入院。采用多变量Cox回归模型评估基于PPIs和P-CAB使用的UGI出血风险。结果:在210447例经DAPT行PCI治疗的患者中(平均年龄65.5岁;74.7%的男性)、4.6%和47.5%的患者分别服用了p - cab和PPIs。总体而言,0.3%的患者在PCI术后6个月内出现UGI出血。P-CAB使用者UGI出血的风险降低(校正风险比,0.59;95%置信区间为0.38-0.92;p = 0.019),与未接受p - cab或PPI的患者相比。p - cab和PPI使用者之间无显著差异(p < 0.05)。结论:在韩国接受DAPT PCI的患者中,P-CABs减少UGI出血的效果与ppi相当。这些发现表明,p - cab是PPIs预防UGI出血的潜在替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers on Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Background and aim: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the drug of choice to prevent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT); however, unmet needs remain. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are novel acid-suppressive drugs that have emerged as potential alternatives. We evaluated the effectiveness of P-CAB in reducing the risk of UGI bleeding in patients receiving DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with PCI on DAPT between January 2019 and January 2023 using the Korean nationwide health claims database. The primary outcome was admission for UGI bleeding within 6 months of PCI. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to evaluate UGI bleeding risk based on PPIs and P-CAB use.

Results: Of the 210 447 patients who underwent PCI on DAPT (mean age, 65.5 years; 74.7% men), 4.6% and 47.5% patients were prescribed P-CABs and PPIs, respectively. Overall, 0.3% of patients experienced UGI bleeding within 6 months of PCI. P-CAB users had a reduced risk of UGI bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.92; p = 0.019) compared with patients not receiving P-CAB or PPI. No significant difference was observed between the P-CAB and PPI users (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Among Korean patients undergoing PCI with DAPT, P-CABs reduced UGI bleeding comparably to PPIs. These findings suggest that P-CABs are potential alternatives to PPIs for preventing UGI bleeding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信