是什么决定了保育员在工作中的身体行为?丹麦日托机构、团队和工人层面的决定因素调查。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Christian Tolstrup Wester, Luiz Augusto Brusaca, Javier Palarea-Albaladejo, Stavros Kyriakidis, Anders Dreyer Frost, Andreas Holtermann, Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen
{"title":"是什么决定了保育员在工作中的身体行为?丹麦日托机构、团队和工人层面的决定因素调查。","authors":"Christian Tolstrup Wester, Luiz Augusto Brusaca, Javier Palarea-Albaladejo, Stavros Kyriakidis, Anders Dreyer Frost, Andreas Holtermann, Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The childcare sector faces several challenges such as high rates of sick leave, employee turnover, and pain. We know that the physical behaviours the workers do at work are important for their musculoskeletal health and sick leave. However, we lack knowledge of which workplace factors determine the physical behaviours of workers. Therefore, we aimed to investigate which organisational levels and factors of Danish day nurseries determine the physical behaviours at work of childcare workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 178 childcare workers from 73 teams and 16 day nurseries in Denmark. Workers were, on average, 36.5 years of age, mostly female (84%) and 57% were educated pedagogues. We measured physical behaviours (i.e. sedentary, light physical activity, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) during working hours using a thigh-worn accelerometer, and expressed them as isometric log-ratio coordinates for analysis according to compositional data analysis procedures. We examined 15 potential determinants of physical behaviours at work at three organisational levels: institutions (e.g. permanent-to-not-permanent staff ratio), teams (e.g. worker-to-child ratio), and workers (e.g. age, BMI, physical exertion). Variance component analysis identified the percentage contribution to the total variance of physical behaviours of each organisational level. Linear mixed models were used to investigate associations between determinants at each level and the physical behaviours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The largest contribution to the total variance in childcare workers' physical behaviours was observed at the worker level (95.5%), while team (2%) and institution (2.5%) levels contributed to only a minor extent. Two individual factors at the worker level-physical exertion (P < 0.01) and pain intensity (P = 0.01)-were significantly, but weakly associated with physical behaviours. Specifically, an increased physical exertion was associated with a 3.7% increase in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (P = 0.019) and a 6% decrease in sedentary behaviour (P = 0.009), relative to the remaining behaviours. Also, an increased pain intensity was associated with a 3.6% decrease in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (P = 0.008), relative to the remaining behaviours. No determinants at the institution and team levels were significantly associated with physical behaviours.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, worker level determines nearly all of the variability in physical behaviours while the institution and team levels only explain a little. That only two individual worker-level factors were weakly associated with physical behaviours indicates that other unmeasured worker-level factors are important determinants of the physical behaviours of childcare workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What determines childcare workers physical behaviours at work? An investigation of determinants at the institution, team, and worker levels in Danish day nurseries.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Tolstrup Wester, Luiz Augusto Brusaca, Javier Palarea-Albaladejo, Stavros Kyriakidis, Anders Dreyer Frost, Andreas Holtermann, Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/annweh/wxaf016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The childcare sector faces several challenges such as high rates of sick leave, employee turnover, and pain. We know that the physical behaviours the workers do at work are important for their musculoskeletal health and sick leave. However, we lack knowledge of which workplace factors determine the physical behaviours of workers. Therefore, we aimed to investigate which organisational levels and factors of Danish day nurseries determine the physical behaviours at work of childcare workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 178 childcare workers from 73 teams and 16 day nurseries in Denmark. Workers were, on average, 36.5 years of age, mostly female (84%) and 57% were educated pedagogues. We measured physical behaviours (i.e. sedentary, light physical activity, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) during working hours using a thigh-worn accelerometer, and expressed them as isometric log-ratio coordinates for analysis according to compositional data analysis procedures. We examined 15 potential determinants of physical behaviours at work at three organisational levels: institutions (e.g. permanent-to-not-permanent staff ratio), teams (e.g. worker-to-child ratio), and workers (e.g. age, BMI, physical exertion). Variance component analysis identified the percentage contribution to the total variance of physical behaviours of each organisational level. Linear mixed models were used to investigate associations between determinants at each level and the physical behaviours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The largest contribution to the total variance in childcare workers' physical behaviours was observed at the worker level (95.5%), while team (2%) and institution (2.5%) levels contributed to only a minor extent. Two individual factors at the worker level-physical exertion (P < 0.01) and pain intensity (P = 0.01)-were significantly, but weakly associated with physical behaviours. Specifically, an increased physical exertion was associated with a 3.7% increase in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (P = 0.019) and a 6% decrease in sedentary behaviour (P = 0.009), relative to the remaining behaviours. Also, an increased pain intensity was associated with a 3.6% decrease in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (P = 0.008), relative to the remaining behaviours. No determinants at the institution and team levels were significantly associated with physical behaviours.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, worker level determines nearly all of the variability in physical behaviours while the institution and team levels only explain a little. That only two individual worker-level factors were weakly associated with physical behaviours indicates that other unmeasured worker-level factors are important determinants of the physical behaviours of childcare workers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:托儿行业面临着一些挑战,如高病假率,员工流动率和疼痛。我们知道工人在工作中的身体行为对他们的肌肉骨骼健康和病假很重要。然而,我们缺乏哪些工作场所因素决定了工人的身体行为的知识。因此,我们的目的是调查丹麦日托机构的哪些组织水平和因素决定了托儿工作者在工作中的身体行为。方法:本横断面研究包括来自丹麦73个团队和16个日间托儿所的178名托儿工作者。工人的平均年龄为36.5岁,大多数是女性(84%),57%是受过教育的教师。我们使用穿戴在大腿上的加速度计测量工作时间内的身体行为(即久坐、轻度身体活动和中高强度身体活动),并根据成分数据分析程序将其表示为等距对数比坐标进行分析。我们在三个组织层面研究了工作中身体行为的15个潜在决定因素:机构(如固定员工与非固定员工的比例)、团队(如工人与儿童的比例)和工人(如年龄、体重指数、体力消耗)。方差成分分析确定了对每个组织级别的物理行为总方差的百分比贡献。使用线性混合模型来研究每个层次的决定因素与物理行为之间的关联。结果:保育员身体行为的总方差中,工作者水平的贡献最大(95.5%),团队(2%)和机构(2.5%)水平的贡献较小。工人体力消耗(P < 0.01)和疼痛强度(P = 0.01)这两个个体因素与身体行为显著相关,但相关性较弱。具体来说,相对于其他行为,体力消耗的增加与中度至剧烈体育活动增加3.7% (P = 0.019)和久坐行为减少6% (P = 0.009)相关。此外,相对于其他行为,疼痛强度的增加与中度至剧烈体育活动减少3.6%相关(P = 0.008)。在机构和团队层面,没有决定因素与身体行为显著相关。结论:在本研究中,员工水平决定了几乎所有的身体行为变异,而机构和团队水平只解释了一点。只有两个单独的工人层面因素与身体行为弱相关,这表明其他未测量的工人层面因素是托儿工作者身体行为的重要决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What determines childcare workers physical behaviours at work? An investigation of determinants at the institution, team, and worker levels in Danish day nurseries.

Objectives: The childcare sector faces several challenges such as high rates of sick leave, employee turnover, and pain. We know that the physical behaviours the workers do at work are important for their musculoskeletal health and sick leave. However, we lack knowledge of which workplace factors determine the physical behaviours of workers. Therefore, we aimed to investigate which organisational levels and factors of Danish day nurseries determine the physical behaviours at work of childcare workers.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 178 childcare workers from 73 teams and 16 day nurseries in Denmark. Workers were, on average, 36.5 years of age, mostly female (84%) and 57% were educated pedagogues. We measured physical behaviours (i.e. sedentary, light physical activity, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) during working hours using a thigh-worn accelerometer, and expressed them as isometric log-ratio coordinates for analysis according to compositional data analysis procedures. We examined 15 potential determinants of physical behaviours at work at three organisational levels: institutions (e.g. permanent-to-not-permanent staff ratio), teams (e.g. worker-to-child ratio), and workers (e.g. age, BMI, physical exertion). Variance component analysis identified the percentage contribution to the total variance of physical behaviours of each organisational level. Linear mixed models were used to investigate associations between determinants at each level and the physical behaviours.

Results: The largest contribution to the total variance in childcare workers' physical behaviours was observed at the worker level (95.5%), while team (2%) and institution (2.5%) levels contributed to only a minor extent. Two individual factors at the worker level-physical exertion (P < 0.01) and pain intensity (P = 0.01)-were significantly, but weakly associated with physical behaviours. Specifically, an increased physical exertion was associated with a 3.7% increase in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (P = 0.019) and a 6% decrease in sedentary behaviour (P = 0.009), relative to the remaining behaviours. Also, an increased pain intensity was associated with a 3.6% decrease in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (P = 0.008), relative to the remaining behaviours. No determinants at the institution and team levels were significantly associated with physical behaviours.

Conclusions: In this study, worker level determines nearly all of the variability in physical behaviours while the institution and team levels only explain a little. That only two individual worker-level factors were weakly associated with physical behaviours indicates that other unmeasured worker-level factors are important determinants of the physical behaviours of childcare workers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals Of Work Exposures and Health
Annals Of Work Exposures and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
19.20%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: About the Journal Annals of Work Exposures and Health is dedicated to presenting advances in exposure science supporting the recognition, quantification, and control of exposures at work, and epidemiological studies on their effects on human health and well-being. A key question we apply to submission is, "Is this paper going to help readers better understand, quantify, and control conditions at work that adversely or positively affect health and well-being?" We are interested in high quality scientific research addressing: the quantification of work exposures, including chemical, biological, physical, biomechanical, and psychosocial, and the elements of work organization giving rise to such exposures; the relationship between these exposures and the acute and chronic health consequences for those exposed and their families and communities; populations at special risk of work-related exposures including women, under-represented minorities, immigrants, and other vulnerable groups such as temporary, contingent and informal sector workers; the effectiveness of interventions addressing exposure and risk including production technologies, work process engineering, and personal protective systems; policies and management approaches to reduce risk and improve health and well-being among workers, their families or communities; methodologies and mechanisms that underlie the quantification and/or control of exposure and risk. There is heavy pressure on space in the journal, and the above interests mean that we do not usually publish papers that simply report local conditions without generalizable results. We are also unlikely to publish reports on human health and well-being without information on the work exposure characteristics giving rise to the effects. We particularly welcome contributions from scientists based in, or addressing conditions in, developing economies that fall within the above scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信