托法替尼作为巨噬细胞激活综合征的可能治疗方法:中国的一项试点单中心研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Clinical Rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI:10.1007/s10067-025-07465-1
Weilin Xie, Qingyan Liu, Yanchun Tang, Yao Li, Yue Zhang, Shuhua Wang, Lin Wang
{"title":"托法替尼作为巨噬细胞激活综合征的可能治疗方法:中国的一项试点单中心研究。","authors":"Weilin Xie, Qingyan Liu, Yanchun Tang, Yao Li, Yue Zhang, Shuhua Wang, Lin Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10067-025-07465-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our pilot study investigated the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) in patients with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), providing a new therapeutic option.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a historical comparator, single-center study. Patients enrolled in our study were screened using the 2016 Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) criteria of MAS. MAS patients deemed suitable for TOF therapy were enrolled in the experimental group. The control group included MAS patients from Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital who had received biological and/or conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/csDMARDs) treatment in a similar period. Clinical characteristics, laboratory test results, MAS treatment response rates, and glucocorticoid discontinuation rates were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Serious adverse events such as thrombosis or severe infection were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 MAS patients were included-17 in the TOF treatment group and 19 in the b/csDMARDs control group. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. After six weeks, the proportion of febrile patients was significantly lower in the TOF group compared to the control group (11.8% [2/17] vs. 47.3% [9/19], P = 0.021). Significant reductions were also observed in C-reactive protein levels at week 6 (5.9% [1/17] vs. 36.8% [7/19], P = 0.026) and ferritin levels at week 12 (100.0% [17/17] vs. 26.3% [5/19], P = 0.023). The MAS treatment response rate was significantly higher in the TOF group at weeks 2 and 6 (P = 0.029 and P = 0.023, respectively). Glucocorticoid discontinuation was more frequent in the TOF group, with a 12-week discontinuation rate of 100.0% (17/17) compared to 57.9% (11/19) in the control group (P = 0.002). No serious adverse events, including thrombosis or severe infections, were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that TOF may be as effective as or even better than b/csDMARDs, with a quicker and higher response rate in patients with MAS without severe adverse events. Key Points •Tofacitinib may be as effective or better than b/csDMARDs in MAS. •Tofacitinib may act at a quicker and higher response rate in MAS. •Tofacitinib might be an alternative therapeutic option for patients with MAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10482,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"2087-2093"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tofacitinib as a possible treatment in macrophage activation syndrome: a pilot single-center study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Weilin Xie, Qingyan Liu, Yanchun Tang, Yao Li, Yue Zhang, Shuhua Wang, Lin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10067-025-07465-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our pilot study investigated the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) in patients with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), providing a new therapeutic option.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a historical comparator, single-center study. Patients enrolled in our study were screened using the 2016 Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) criteria of MAS. MAS patients deemed suitable for TOF therapy were enrolled in the experimental group. The control group included MAS patients from Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital who had received biological and/or conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/csDMARDs) treatment in a similar period. Clinical characteristics, laboratory test results, MAS treatment response rates, and glucocorticoid discontinuation rates were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Serious adverse events such as thrombosis or severe infection were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 MAS patients were included-17 in the TOF treatment group and 19 in the b/csDMARDs control group. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. After six weeks, the proportion of febrile patients was significantly lower in the TOF group compared to the control group (11.8% [2/17] vs. 47.3% [9/19], P = 0.021). Significant reductions were also observed in C-reactive protein levels at week 6 (5.9% [1/17] vs. 36.8% [7/19], P = 0.026) and ferritin levels at week 12 (100.0% [17/17] vs. 26.3% [5/19], P = 0.023). The MAS treatment response rate was significantly higher in the TOF group at weeks 2 and 6 (P = 0.029 and P = 0.023, respectively). Glucocorticoid discontinuation was more frequent in the TOF group, with a 12-week discontinuation rate of 100.0% (17/17) compared to 57.9% (11/19) in the control group (P = 0.002). No serious adverse events, including thrombosis or severe infections, were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that TOF may be as effective as or even better than b/csDMARDs, with a quicker and higher response rate in patients with MAS without severe adverse events. Key Points •Tofacitinib may be as effective or better than b/csDMARDs in MAS. •Tofacitinib may act at a quicker and higher response rate in MAS. •Tofacitinib might be an alternative therapeutic option for patients with MAS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2087-2093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-025-07465-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-025-07465-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的初步研究探讨了托法替尼(TOF)治疗巨噬细胞激活综合征(MAS)的有效性和安全性,为巨噬细胞激活综合征(MAS)患者提供了一种新的治疗选择。方法:这是一项历史比较,单中心研究。纳入我们研究的患者使用2016年儿科风湿病国际试验组织(PRINTO)的MAS标准进行筛选。实验组为适合TOF治疗的MAS患者。对照组包括同期接受生物和/或常规合成抗风湿药物治疗的烟台玉皇顶医院的MAS患者。比较两组患者治疗前后的临床特点、实验室检查结果、MAS治疗有效率及糖皮质激素停药率。严重不良事件如血栓形成或严重感染均有记录。结果:共纳入36例MAS患者,其中TOF治疗组17例,b/csDMARDs对照组19例。两组间的基线人口学和临床特征具有可比性。6周后,TOF组发热患者比例明显低于对照组(11.8%[2/17]比47.3% [9/19],P = 0.021)。第6周c -反应蛋白水平(5.9%[1/17]对36.8% [7/19],P = 0.026)和第12周铁蛋白水平(100.0%[17/17]对26.3% [5/19],P = 0.023)也显著降低。TOF组在第2周和第6周的MAS治疗有效率显著高于TOF组(P = 0.029和P = 0.023)。TOF组的糖皮质激素停药频率更高,12周停药率为100.0%(17/17),对照组为57.9% (11/19)(P = 0.002)。没有严重的不良事件,包括血栓形成或严重感染的报道。结论:我们的研究结果表明,TOF可能与b/csDMARDs一样有效,甚至更好,在没有严重不良事件的MAS患者中具有更快和更高的缓解率。•在MAS中,Tofacitinib可能与b/csDMARDs一样有效或更好。•托法替尼可能在MAS中以更快和更高的反应率起作用。•托法替尼可能是MAS患者的另一种治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tofacitinib as a possible treatment in macrophage activation syndrome: a pilot single-center study in China.

Objectives: Our pilot study investigated the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) in patients with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), providing a new therapeutic option.

Methods: This was a historical comparator, single-center study. Patients enrolled in our study were screened using the 2016 Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) criteria of MAS. MAS patients deemed suitable for TOF therapy were enrolled in the experimental group. The control group included MAS patients from Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital who had received biological and/or conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/csDMARDs) treatment in a similar period. Clinical characteristics, laboratory test results, MAS treatment response rates, and glucocorticoid discontinuation rates were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Serious adverse events such as thrombosis or severe infection were recorded.

Results: A total of 36 MAS patients were included-17 in the TOF treatment group and 19 in the b/csDMARDs control group. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. After six weeks, the proportion of febrile patients was significantly lower in the TOF group compared to the control group (11.8% [2/17] vs. 47.3% [9/19], P = 0.021). Significant reductions were also observed in C-reactive protein levels at week 6 (5.9% [1/17] vs. 36.8% [7/19], P = 0.026) and ferritin levels at week 12 (100.0% [17/17] vs. 26.3% [5/19], P = 0.023). The MAS treatment response rate was significantly higher in the TOF group at weeks 2 and 6 (P = 0.029 and P = 0.023, respectively). Glucocorticoid discontinuation was more frequent in the TOF group, with a 12-week discontinuation rate of 100.0% (17/17) compared to 57.9% (11/19) in the control group (P = 0.002). No serious adverse events, including thrombosis or severe infections, were reported.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that TOF may be as effective as or even better than b/csDMARDs, with a quicker and higher response rate in patients with MAS without severe adverse events. Key Points •Tofacitinib may be as effective or better than b/csDMARDs in MAS. •Tofacitinib may act at a quicker and higher response rate in MAS. •Tofacitinib might be an alternative therapeutic option for patients with MAS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rheumatology
Clinical Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
441
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Rheumatology is an international English-language journal devoted to publishing original clinical investigation and research in the general field of rheumatology with accent on clinical aspects at postgraduate level. The journal succeeds Acta Rheumatologica Belgica, originally founded in 1945 as the official journal of the Belgian Rheumatology Society. Clinical Rheumatology aims to cover all modern trends in clinical and experimental research as well as the management and evaluation of diagnostic and treatment procedures connected with the inflammatory, immunologic, metabolic, genetic and degenerative soft and hard connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信