中介荟萃分析中前测后测控制组设计的综合数据。

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Zhiming Lu, Zijun Ke, Rebecca Y M Cheung, Qian Zhang
{"title":"中介荟萃分析中前测后测控制组设计的综合数据。","authors":"Zhiming Lu, Zijun Ke, Rebecca Y M Cheung, Qian Zhang","doi":"10.3758/s13428-025-02661-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to address the existing concerns for mediation meta-analysis (MMA) conducted under pretest-posttest-control-group (PPCG) designs. These issues include the validity of meta-analytic structural equation modeling with a binary independent variable, heterogeneously defined treatment doses, and potential violations of the homogeneous variance assumption. Moreover, an open question remains regarding whether effect sizes in MMA over PPCG designs should be computed from posttest scores (PSMMA) or from pretest-posttest change scores (CSMMA). This study employs theoretical discussions and Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate the feasibility of MMA under PPCG designs and to compare CSMMA and PSMMA. Furthermore, the procedures for computing effect sizes are summarized, and an empirical example is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 5","pages":"146"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthesizing data from pretest-posttest-control-group designs in mediation meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiming Lu, Zijun Ke, Rebecca Y M Cheung, Qian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13428-025-02661-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aims to address the existing concerns for mediation meta-analysis (MMA) conducted under pretest-posttest-control-group (PPCG) designs. These issues include the validity of meta-analytic structural equation modeling with a binary independent variable, heterogeneously defined treatment doses, and potential violations of the homogeneous variance assumption. Moreover, an open question remains regarding whether effect sizes in MMA over PPCG designs should be computed from posttest scores (PSMMA) or from pretest-posttest change scores (CSMMA). This study employs theoretical discussions and Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate the feasibility of MMA under PPCG designs and to compare CSMMA and PSMMA. Furthermore, the procedures for computing effect sizes are summarized, and an empirical example is presented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"volume\":\"57 5\",\"pages\":\"146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02661-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02661-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在前测-后测-对照组(PPCG)设计下进行的中介meta分析(MMA)存在的问题。这些问题包括二元自变量的元分析结构方程模型的有效性,治疗剂量的异质性定义,以及同质方差假设的潜在违反。此外,一个悬而未决的问题是,MMA与PPCG设计的效应大小是否应该从后测分数(PSMMA)或从前测-后测变化分数(CSMMA)计算。本文采用理论讨论和蒙特卡罗模拟的方法,论证了在PPCG设计下MMA的可行性,并对CSMMA和PSMMA进行了比较。此外,总结了计算效应量的步骤,并给出了一个实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synthesizing data from pretest-posttest-control-group designs in mediation meta-analysis.

This study aims to address the existing concerns for mediation meta-analysis (MMA) conducted under pretest-posttest-control-group (PPCG) designs. These issues include the validity of meta-analytic structural equation modeling with a binary independent variable, heterogeneously defined treatment doses, and potential violations of the homogeneous variance assumption. Moreover, an open question remains regarding whether effect sizes in MMA over PPCG designs should be computed from posttest scores (PSMMA) or from pretest-posttest change scores (CSMMA). This study employs theoretical discussions and Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate the feasibility of MMA under PPCG designs and to compare CSMMA and PSMMA. Furthermore, the procedures for computing effect sizes are summarized, and an empirical example is presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信