超声乳化术与两种新型非球面人工晶状体植入术的临床效果比较:真实数据。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Shikha Talwar Bassi
{"title":"超声乳化术与两种新型非球面人工晶状体植入术的临床效果比较:真实数据。","authors":"Shikha Talwar Bassi","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_2395_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare the visual and refractive outcomes of two new aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs), that is, Clareon (Model CNA0T0) and Tecnis Eyhance (Model ICB00), in patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted at a tertiary referral institute in South India. A total of 132 eyes (91 patients) were included, with 66 eyes implanted with Clareon IOL (group 1) and 66 eyes with Tecnis Eyhance IOL (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative data were collected from January 2022 to April 2024. Primary outcomes included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), spherical equivalent, and refractive cylinder, measured at 3 weeks postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent sample t-test and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, with P values <0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) UDVA in group 1 was 0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.11, 0.17]) and in group 2 was 0.16 (95% CI [0.13, 0.19]) (P value 0.16). The mean logMAR UNVA in group 1 was M = 0.55 (95% CI [0.53, 0.58]) and in group 2 was M = 0.5 (95% CI [0.48, 0.52]) (P value 0.0006). The mean add required for group 1 was + 1.76 (95% CI [1.66, 1.86]) and for group 2 was M = 1.56 (95% CI [1.49, 1.62]) (P value 0.0005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At 3 weeks postoperatively, both IOLs provided excellent visual outcomes. Tecnis Eyhance IOL offered enhanced near-vision performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of clinical outcomes of phacoemulsification with implantation of two new aspheric intraocular lenses: Real-world data.\",\"authors\":\"Shikha Talwar Bassi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/IJO.IJO_2395_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare the visual and refractive outcomes of two new aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs), that is, Clareon (Model CNA0T0) and Tecnis Eyhance (Model ICB00), in patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted at a tertiary referral institute in South India. A total of 132 eyes (91 patients) were included, with 66 eyes implanted with Clareon IOL (group 1) and 66 eyes with Tecnis Eyhance IOL (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative data were collected from January 2022 to April 2024. Primary outcomes included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), spherical equivalent, and refractive cylinder, measured at 3 weeks postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent sample t-test and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, with P values <0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) UDVA in group 1 was 0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.11, 0.17]) and in group 2 was 0.16 (95% CI [0.13, 0.19]) (P value 0.16). The mean logMAR UNVA in group 1 was M = 0.55 (95% CI [0.53, 0.58]) and in group 2 was M = 0.5 (95% CI [0.48, 0.52]) (P value 0.0006). The mean add required for group 1 was + 1.76 (95% CI [1.66, 1.86]) and for group 2 was M = 1.56 (95% CI [1.49, 1.62]) (P value 0.0005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At 3 weeks postoperatively, both IOLs provided excellent visual outcomes. Tecnis Eyhance IOL offered enhanced near-vision performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2395_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2395_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较两种新型非球面体人工晶状体Clareon (CNA0T0型)和Tecnis Eyhance (ICB00型)在白内障超声乳化手术中的视力和屈光效果。方法:回顾性比较分析在印度南部的三级转诊机构进行。共纳入132只眼(91例),其中Clareon人工晶状体66只眼(1组),Tecnis Eyhance人工晶状体66只眼(2组)。术前和术后数据采集时间为2022年1月至2024年4月。主要结果包括术后3周测量的未矫正距离视力(UDVA)、未矫正近视力(UNVA)、球面等效视力和屈光柱。采用独立样本t检验和社会科学软件统计软件包进行统计分析,P值结果:组1最小分辨角(logMAR) UDVA的平均对数为0.14(95%可信区间[CI][0.11, 0.17]),组2为0.16 (95% CI [0.13, 0.19]) (P值0.16)。组1的logMAR UNVA均值为M = 0.55 (95% CI[0.53, 0.58]),组2的logMAR UNVA均值为M = 0.5 (95% CI [0.48, 0.52]) (P值0.0006)。组1所需的平均添加量为+ 1.76 (95% CI[1.66, 1.86]),组2所需的平均添加量为M = 1.56 (95% CI [1.49, 1.62]) (P值0.0005)。结论:术后3周,两种人工晶状体的视力均良好。Tecnis Eyhance IOL提供了增强的近视力表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of clinical outcomes of phacoemulsification with implantation of two new aspheric intraocular lenses: Real-world data.

Purpose: This study aims to compare the visual and refractive outcomes of two new aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs), that is, Clareon (Model CNA0T0) and Tecnis Eyhance (Model ICB00), in patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted at a tertiary referral institute in South India. A total of 132 eyes (91 patients) were included, with 66 eyes implanted with Clareon IOL (group 1) and 66 eyes with Tecnis Eyhance IOL (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative data were collected from January 2022 to April 2024. Primary outcomes included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), spherical equivalent, and refractive cylinder, measured at 3 weeks postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent sample t-test and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, with P values <0.05 considered significant.

Results: The mean log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) UDVA in group 1 was 0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.11, 0.17]) and in group 2 was 0.16 (95% CI [0.13, 0.19]) (P value 0.16). The mean logMAR UNVA in group 1 was M = 0.55 (95% CI [0.53, 0.58]) and in group 2 was M = 0.5 (95% CI [0.48, 0.52]) (P value 0.0006). The mean add required for group 1 was + 1.76 (95% CI [1.66, 1.86]) and for group 2 was M = 1.56 (95% CI [1.49, 1.62]) (P value 0.0005).

Conclusion: At 3 weeks postoperatively, both IOLs provided excellent visual outcomes. Tecnis Eyhance IOL offered enhanced near-vision performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信