移民肾衰竭护理:一项欧洲调查。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Cédric Rafat, Ewa Pawlowicz-Szlarska, Gaetano Alfano, Alice Doreille, Amaryllis H Van Craenenbroeck, Liz Lightstone, Valérie Luyckx, Silvia Salaro, Maria Jose Soler, Dominique Tudor, Andreas Kronbichler, Safak Mirioglu
{"title":"移民肾衰竭护理:一项欧洲调查。","authors":"Cédric Rafat, Ewa Pawlowicz-Szlarska, Gaetano Alfano, Alice Doreille, Amaryllis H Van Craenenbroeck, Liz Lightstone, Valérie Luyckx, Silvia Salaro, Maria Jose Soler, Dominique Tudor, Andreas Kronbichler, Safak Mirioglu","doi":"10.1007/s40620-025-02290-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of migrants with kidney failure and no medical insurance raises complex medical, social, financial, and ethical issues. The survey aimed to investigate (i) current practices in managing these patients, and (ii) the perspective of European nephrologists on ethical dilemmas and optimal care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was piloted by the ISN Western Europe Regional Board, with members of the Young Nephrologists' Platform (YNP) of the European Renal Association (ERA), and disseminated to European nephrologists in the ISN and YNP networks. Responses were collected anonymously via SurveyMonkey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 378 responses were collected from 29 European countries. Most (57%) managed fewer than 3 migrant patients with kidney failure per week, while 10% managed more than 11. Most respondents indicated that access to dialysis was unrestricted (59%), although only 25% said migrant patients were systematically eligible for kidney transplantation. Many nephrologists (38%) were unaware of the directives of governmental bodies or hospital protocols regarding migrant patients. The most common obstacles to patient management included language non concordance (64%), uncertainty about the future (56%), and lack of knowledge of medical history (49%). Two-thirds felt managing migrant patients was a moral duty, though 52% reported stress within the clinical caregiving team.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite strong commitment from European nephrologists, a fragmented legal framework, remaining barriers, and uneven case distribution hinder optimal care for migrant patients with kidney disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kidney failure care for migrants: a European survey.\",\"authors\":\"Cédric Rafat, Ewa Pawlowicz-Szlarska, Gaetano Alfano, Alice Doreille, Amaryllis H Van Craenenbroeck, Liz Lightstone, Valérie Luyckx, Silvia Salaro, Maria Jose Soler, Dominique Tudor, Andreas Kronbichler, Safak Mirioglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40620-025-02290-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of migrants with kidney failure and no medical insurance raises complex medical, social, financial, and ethical issues. The survey aimed to investigate (i) current practices in managing these patients, and (ii) the perspective of European nephrologists on ethical dilemmas and optimal care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was piloted by the ISN Western Europe Regional Board, with members of the Young Nephrologists' Platform (YNP) of the European Renal Association (ERA), and disseminated to European nephrologists in the ISN and YNP networks. Responses were collected anonymously via SurveyMonkey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 378 responses were collected from 29 European countries. Most (57%) managed fewer than 3 migrant patients with kidney failure per week, while 10% managed more than 11. Most respondents indicated that access to dialysis was unrestricted (59%), although only 25% said migrant patients were systematically eligible for kidney transplantation. Many nephrologists (38%) were unaware of the directives of governmental bodies or hospital protocols regarding migrant patients. The most common obstacles to patient management included language non concordance (64%), uncertainty about the future (56%), and lack of knowledge of medical history (49%). Two-thirds felt managing migrant patients was a moral duty, though 52% reported stress within the clinical caregiving team.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite strong commitment from European nephrologists, a fragmented legal framework, remaining barriers, and uneven case distribution hinder optimal care for migrant patients with kidney disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02290-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02290-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对无医疗保险的肾衰竭移民的管理引发了复杂的医疗、社会、经济和伦理问题。该调查旨在调查(1)目前管理这些患者的做法,以及(2)欧洲肾病学家对伦理困境和最佳护理的看法。方法:该调查由欧洲肾脏协会(ERA)青年肾病学家平台(YNP)成员组成的ISN西欧区域委员会进行试点,并传播给ISN和YNP网络中的欧洲肾病学家。调查问卷通过SurveyMonkey匿名收集。结果:共收集了来自29个欧洲国家的378份回复。大多数(57%)每周管理少于3名移民肾衰竭患者,而10%管理超过11名。大多数应答者表示透析的可及性不受限制(59%),尽管只有25%的人表示流动患者系统地符合肾移植的条件。许多肾病学家(38%)不知道政府机构关于流动病人的指示或医院规程。患者管理最常见的障碍包括语言不一致(64%)、对未来不确定(56%)和缺乏病史知识(49%)。三分之二的人认为管理流动病人是一种道德责任,尽管52%的人表示临床护理团队内部存在压力。结论:尽管欧洲肾病学家做出了坚定的承诺,但支离破碎的法律框架、仍然存在的障碍和不均匀的病例分布阻碍了对移民肾病患者的最佳护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kidney failure care for migrants: a European survey.

Background: The management of migrants with kidney failure and no medical insurance raises complex medical, social, financial, and ethical issues. The survey aimed to investigate (i) current practices in managing these patients, and (ii) the perspective of European nephrologists on ethical dilemmas and optimal care.

Methods: The survey was piloted by the ISN Western Europe Regional Board, with members of the Young Nephrologists' Platform (YNP) of the European Renal Association (ERA), and disseminated to European nephrologists in the ISN and YNP networks. Responses were collected anonymously via SurveyMonkey.

Results: A total of 378 responses were collected from 29 European countries. Most (57%) managed fewer than 3 migrant patients with kidney failure per week, while 10% managed more than 11. Most respondents indicated that access to dialysis was unrestricted (59%), although only 25% said migrant patients were systematically eligible for kidney transplantation. Many nephrologists (38%) were unaware of the directives of governmental bodies or hospital protocols regarding migrant patients. The most common obstacles to patient management included language non concordance (64%), uncertainty about the future (56%), and lack of knowledge of medical history (49%). Two-thirds felt managing migrant patients was a moral duty, though 52% reported stress within the clinical caregiving team.

Conclusion: Despite strong commitment from European nephrologists, a fragmented legal framework, remaining barriers, and uneven case distribution hinder optimal care for migrant patients with kidney disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信