探索老年患者的院内活动实践:来自混合方法研究的见解。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Lea Kromann Johansen, Trine Schifter Larsen, Jeanette Wassar Kirk, Britt Staevnsbo Pedersen, Barbara Rubek Nielsen, Thomas Kallemose, Thomas Bandholm, Mette Merete Pedersen
{"title":"探索老年患者的院内活动实践:来自混合方法研究的见解。","authors":"Lea Kromann Johansen, Trine Schifter Larsen, Jeanette Wassar Kirk, Britt Staevnsbo Pedersen, Barbara Rubek Nielsen, Thomas Kallemose, Thomas Bandholm, Mette Merete Pedersen","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05976-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is well-established that mobility is very limited among older hospitalized patients and associated with several negative outcomes. Therefore, this mixed-methods study aimed to quantify 24-hour mobility levels in acutely admitted older adults and simultaneously explore clinical practice with regards to mobilization and mobility through an ethnographic field study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 6-week period, hospital mobility was assessed in 44 geriatric patients by SENS motion<sup>®</sup> activity sensors that the patients wore continuously for 24 h a day during their hospitalization. An ethnographic field study was conducted alongside the cohort study. It included participant observation on the ward and situated conversations with staff, patients, and relatives 2-3 times a week for 4-5 h at different times of the day. The observations were noted in field notes. Activity data were aggregated into a per day measure based on the mean of all available days for a given patient. Also, the per day measures were stratified by walking dependency (walking with or without a walking aid). The field notes were analyzed through a thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During hospitalization, the patients spent most of their time (22.8 h/per day) in sedentary behavior and only 1.2 h/per day in uptime (walking and standing), including 43 min walking, and took less than 1200 steps daily. The field study revealed that most staff consider mobilization and mobility important tasks. However, mobilizing patients to a chair and performing functional level assessments are prioritized over patient mobility. Also, the patients' perceived mobility opportunities are limited by the physical environment (e.g., congested hallways) and lack of purposeful activities to engage in.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found low levels of mobility in geriatric inpatients during hospitalization. While mobility is considered important, mobilization to a chair and functional assessments are prioritized over patient mobility, which becomes dependent on the patient's own initiative. Therefore, environmental adjustment, enhanced interprofessional collaboration, and targeted strategies for integrating mobility into daily care practices are warranted to enhance in-hospital mobility. ClincalTrials.Gov identifier NCT06421246.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"330"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring in-hospital mobility practices for geriatric patients: insights from a mixed-method study.\",\"authors\":\"Lea Kromann Johansen, Trine Schifter Larsen, Jeanette Wassar Kirk, Britt Staevnsbo Pedersen, Barbara Rubek Nielsen, Thomas Kallemose, Thomas Bandholm, Mette Merete Pedersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-025-05976-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is well-established that mobility is very limited among older hospitalized patients and associated with several negative outcomes. Therefore, this mixed-methods study aimed to quantify 24-hour mobility levels in acutely admitted older adults and simultaneously explore clinical practice with regards to mobilization and mobility through an ethnographic field study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 6-week period, hospital mobility was assessed in 44 geriatric patients by SENS motion<sup>®</sup> activity sensors that the patients wore continuously for 24 h a day during their hospitalization. An ethnographic field study was conducted alongside the cohort study. It included participant observation on the ward and situated conversations with staff, patients, and relatives 2-3 times a week for 4-5 h at different times of the day. The observations were noted in field notes. Activity data were aggregated into a per day measure based on the mean of all available days for a given patient. Also, the per day measures were stratified by walking dependency (walking with or without a walking aid). The field notes were analyzed through a thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During hospitalization, the patients spent most of their time (22.8 h/per day) in sedentary behavior and only 1.2 h/per day in uptime (walking and standing), including 43 min walking, and took less than 1200 steps daily. The field study revealed that most staff consider mobilization and mobility important tasks. However, mobilizing patients to a chair and performing functional level assessments are prioritized over patient mobility. Also, the patients' perceived mobility opportunities are limited by the physical environment (e.g., congested hallways) and lack of purposeful activities to engage in.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found low levels of mobility in geriatric inpatients during hospitalization. While mobility is considered important, mobilization to a chair and functional assessments are prioritized over patient mobility, which becomes dependent on the patient's own initiative. Therefore, environmental adjustment, enhanced interprofessional collaboration, and targeted strategies for integrating mobility into daily care practices are warranted to enhance in-hospital mobility. ClincalTrials.Gov identifier NCT06421246.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070506/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05976-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05976-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年住院患者的活动能力非常有限,并与一些负面结果相关。因此,这项混合方法的研究旨在量化急性住院老年人的24小时活动水平,同时通过人种学实地研究探索与活动和活动有关的临床实践。方法:在6周的时间内,通过SENS运动®活动传感器评估44名老年患者的住院活动能力,患者在住院期间每天连续佩戴24小时。在队列研究的同时,还进行了人种学实地研究。它包括在病房进行参与性观察,每周2-3次与工作人员、患者和亲属进行对话,每次4-5小时,在一天的不同时间进行。这些观察记录在实地记录中。活动数据汇总为基于给定患者所有可用天数的平均值的每日测量。此外,根据步行依赖性(带或不带助行器行走)对每天的测量进行分层。通过专题分析分析了实地记录。结果:住院期间,患者大部分时间(22.8 h/ d)为久坐行为,正常活动时间(步行和站立)仅为1.2 h/ d,其中步行43 min,每日步行不足1200步。实地研究表明,大多数工作人员认为动员和调动是重要的任务。然而,将患者动员到椅子上并进行功能水平评估优先于患者的活动。此外,患者感知到的活动机会受到物理环境(例如,拥挤的走廊)和缺乏有目的的活动的限制。结论:本研究发现老年住院患者在住院期间活动能力较低。虽然移动性被认为是重要的,但移动到椅子上和功能评估优先于患者的移动性,这取决于患者自己的主动性。因此,环境调整、加强跨专业合作以及将移动性纳入日常护理实践的有针对性的策略是必要的,以提高医院内的移动性。ClincalTrials。政府标识符NCT06421246。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring in-hospital mobility practices for geriatric patients: insights from a mixed-method study.

Background: It is well-established that mobility is very limited among older hospitalized patients and associated with several negative outcomes. Therefore, this mixed-methods study aimed to quantify 24-hour mobility levels in acutely admitted older adults and simultaneously explore clinical practice with regards to mobilization and mobility through an ethnographic field study.

Methods: Over a 6-week period, hospital mobility was assessed in 44 geriatric patients by SENS motion® activity sensors that the patients wore continuously for 24 h a day during their hospitalization. An ethnographic field study was conducted alongside the cohort study. It included participant observation on the ward and situated conversations with staff, patients, and relatives 2-3 times a week for 4-5 h at different times of the day. The observations were noted in field notes. Activity data were aggregated into a per day measure based on the mean of all available days for a given patient. Also, the per day measures were stratified by walking dependency (walking with or without a walking aid). The field notes were analyzed through a thematic analysis.

Results: During hospitalization, the patients spent most of their time (22.8 h/per day) in sedentary behavior and only 1.2 h/per day in uptime (walking and standing), including 43 min walking, and took less than 1200 steps daily. The field study revealed that most staff consider mobilization and mobility important tasks. However, mobilizing patients to a chair and performing functional level assessments are prioritized over patient mobility. Also, the patients' perceived mobility opportunities are limited by the physical environment (e.g., congested hallways) and lack of purposeful activities to engage in.

Conclusions: This study found low levels of mobility in geriatric inpatients during hospitalization. While mobility is considered important, mobilization to a chair and functional assessments are prioritized over patient mobility, which becomes dependent on the patient's own initiative. Therefore, environmental adjustment, enhanced interprofessional collaboration, and targeted strategies for integrating mobility into daily care practices are warranted to enhance in-hospital mobility. ClincalTrials.Gov identifier NCT06421246.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信