使用99mtc焦磷酸盐对转甲状腺素心脏淀粉样蛋白进行单时间点与双时间点成像。

IF 1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Wesley Ng, Kunthi Pathmaraj, Natalia Kovaleva, Aurora Poon, Peter Kench, Steven Meikle, Andrew Scott, Raef Boktor
{"title":"使用99mtc焦磷酸盐对转甲状腺素心脏淀粉样蛋白进行单时间点与双时间点成像。","authors":"Wesley Ng, Kunthi Pathmaraj, Natalia Kovaleva, Aurora Poon, Peter Kench, Steven Meikle, Andrew Scott, Raef Boktor","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.124.269395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nuclear medicine scintigraphy using <sup>99m</sup>Tc-pyrophosphate has proven valuable in the diagnosis of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis in recent years. However, there is still confusion over the optimal imaging time points. The American Society of Nuclear Cardiology has recommended different imaging time points over the last decade. We aimed to determine whether single- or dual-time-point imaging is required for reporting purposes and which time point would be the most appropriate if a single time point was to be considered. <b>Methods:</b> Cardiac amyloid scans using <sup>99m</sup>Tc-pyrophosphate acquired from 2017 to 2023 were retrieved from our Picture Archiving and Communications System. Scans with static views and SPECT/CT images of the chest for both imaging time points, at 1 h (early) and 3 h (delayed) after injection, were included. Each study was independently read by 3 nuclear medicine physicians. Original clinical reports using both imaging time points were used as a reference to calculate the accuracy of a single time point. <b>Results:</b> In total, 70 patients were included in this study. Reports of cardiac amyloid studies using any single-time-point imaging were highly sensitive, accurate, and specific. There was agreement among all readers. Of the 140 datasets reported by each reader, 4 scans were classified as equivocal, requiring more imaging for confident reporting. <b>Conclusion:</b> Single-time-point imaging showed an accuracy comparable to the dual-time-point imaging in diagnosing cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis. This was further validated by agreement among the 3 readers. Early time-point imaging is preferred, and additional delayed imaging can be acquired when the early result is equivocal.</p>","PeriodicalId":16548,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","volume":" ","pages":"140-145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using <sup>99m</sup>Tc-Pyrophosphate.\",\"authors\":\"Wesley Ng, Kunthi Pathmaraj, Natalia Kovaleva, Aurora Poon, Peter Kench, Steven Meikle, Andrew Scott, Raef Boktor\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnmt.124.269395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nuclear medicine scintigraphy using <sup>99m</sup>Tc-pyrophosphate has proven valuable in the diagnosis of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis in recent years. However, there is still confusion over the optimal imaging time points. The American Society of Nuclear Cardiology has recommended different imaging time points over the last decade. We aimed to determine whether single- or dual-time-point imaging is required for reporting purposes and which time point would be the most appropriate if a single time point was to be considered. <b>Methods:</b> Cardiac amyloid scans using <sup>99m</sup>Tc-pyrophosphate acquired from 2017 to 2023 were retrieved from our Picture Archiving and Communications System. Scans with static views and SPECT/CT images of the chest for both imaging time points, at 1 h (early) and 3 h (delayed) after injection, were included. Each study was independently read by 3 nuclear medicine physicians. Original clinical reports using both imaging time points were used as a reference to calculate the accuracy of a single time point. <b>Results:</b> In total, 70 patients were included in this study. Reports of cardiac amyloid studies using any single-time-point imaging were highly sensitive, accurate, and specific. There was agreement among all readers. Of the 140 datasets reported by each reader, 4 scans were classified as equivocal, requiring more imaging for confident reporting. <b>Conclusion:</b> Single-time-point imaging showed an accuracy comparable to the dual-time-point imaging in diagnosing cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis. This was further validated by agreement among the 3 readers. Early time-point imaging is preferred, and additional delayed imaging can be acquired when the early result is equivocal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"140-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.124.269395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.124.269395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,99mtc焦磷酸盐核医学显像在心脏转甲状腺蛋白淀粉样变的诊断中具有重要的应用价值。然而,对于最佳成像时间点仍然存在困惑。在过去的十年里,美国心脏病学会推荐了不同的成像时间点。我们的目的是确定报告是否需要单时间点或双时间点成像,以及如果考虑单时间点,哪个时间点最合适。方法:从我们的图片存档和通信系统中检索2017年至2023年使用99mtc焦磷酸盐获得的心脏淀粉样蛋白扫描。包括注射后1小时(早期)和3小时(延迟)两个成像时间点的胸部静态视图和SPECT/CT图像扫描。每项研究均由3名核医学医师独立阅读。使用两个成像时间点的原始临床报告作为参考,计算单个时间点的准确性。结果:本研究共纳入70例患者。使用任何单时间点成像的心脏淀粉样蛋白研究报告都是高度敏感、准确和特异性的。所有读者的意见都一致。在每位读者报告的140个数据集中,有4个扫描被归类为模棱两可,需要更多的成像来进行自信的报告。结论:单时间点显像与双时间点显像诊断心脏甲状腺转蛋白淀粉样变的准确性相当。3位读者的一致意见进一步验证了这一点。早期时间点成像是首选,当早期结果不明确时,可以获得额外的延迟成像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate.

Nuclear medicine scintigraphy using 99mTc-pyrophosphate has proven valuable in the diagnosis of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis in recent years. However, there is still confusion over the optimal imaging time points. The American Society of Nuclear Cardiology has recommended different imaging time points over the last decade. We aimed to determine whether single- or dual-time-point imaging is required for reporting purposes and which time point would be the most appropriate if a single time point was to be considered. Methods: Cardiac amyloid scans using 99mTc-pyrophosphate acquired from 2017 to 2023 were retrieved from our Picture Archiving and Communications System. Scans with static views and SPECT/CT images of the chest for both imaging time points, at 1 h (early) and 3 h (delayed) after injection, were included. Each study was independently read by 3 nuclear medicine physicians. Original clinical reports using both imaging time points were used as a reference to calculate the accuracy of a single time point. Results: In total, 70 patients were included in this study. Reports of cardiac amyloid studies using any single-time-point imaging were highly sensitive, accurate, and specific. There was agreement among all readers. Of the 140 datasets reported by each reader, 4 scans were classified as equivocal, requiring more imaging for confident reporting. Conclusion: Single-time-point imaging showed an accuracy comparable to the dual-time-point imaging in diagnosing cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis. This was further validated by agreement among the 3 readers. Early time-point imaging is preferred, and additional delayed imaging can be acquired when the early result is equivocal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of nuclear medicine technology
Journal of nuclear medicine technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信