Li Jiang, Zijian Zhuang, Xi Tang, Fugang Zhang, Haitao Zhu, Xuewen Xu, Dongqing Wang, Lirong Zhang
{"title":"淋巴结- rads分类在直肠癌原发性淋巴结评估中的诊断性能:一项模式基准研究。","authors":"Li Jiang, Zijian Zhuang, Xi Tang, Fugang Zhang, Haitao Zhu, Xuewen Xu, Dongqing Wang, Lirong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06196-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate how well the Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) diagnoses lymph node involvement (LNI) in the initial stages of rectal cancer, utilizing contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), T2-weighted MRI (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI (T1CE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 113 rectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. Two radiologists independently assessed regional lymph nodes using the highest NODE-RADS classification and histopathology as reference criteria. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the McNemar test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Node-RADS showed improved diagnostic performance over short-axis diameter (SAD) in all modalities (AUC: 0.838 vs. 0.744 for CE-CT, 0.845 vs. 0.747 for T2WI, 0.853 vs. 0.786 for T1CE; all P < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of Node-RADS across three modalities ranged from 76.19 - 78.57% and 91.55 - 92.96%, respectively. Pairwise comparisons of sensitivity and specificity among the three modalities showed no significant differences after Bonferroni correction (all McNemar test P = 1.0). There was no significant difference in Node-RADS performance among the three modalities (all P > 0.05). The weighted kappa values were 0.742-0.798.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Node-RADS demonstrated superior diagnostic performance over SAD measurements and similar diagnostic effectiveness in assessing LNI for primary rectal cancer stages across CE-CT, T2WI, and T1CE.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 4","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of node-RADS classification for primary lymph node assessment in rectal cancer: a modality benchmarking study.\",\"authors\":\"Li Jiang, Zijian Zhuang, Xi Tang, Fugang Zhang, Haitao Zhu, Xuewen Xu, Dongqing Wang, Lirong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-025-06196-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate how well the Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) diagnoses lymph node involvement (LNI) in the initial stages of rectal cancer, utilizing contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), T2-weighted MRI (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI (T1CE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 113 rectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. Two radiologists independently assessed regional lymph nodes using the highest NODE-RADS classification and histopathology as reference criteria. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the McNemar test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Node-RADS showed improved diagnostic performance over short-axis diameter (SAD) in all modalities (AUC: 0.838 vs. 0.744 for CE-CT, 0.845 vs. 0.747 for T2WI, 0.853 vs. 0.786 for T1CE; all P < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of Node-RADS across three modalities ranged from 76.19 - 78.57% and 91.55 - 92.96%, respectively. Pairwise comparisons of sensitivity and specificity among the three modalities showed no significant differences after Bonferroni correction (all McNemar test P = 1.0). There was no significant difference in Node-RADS performance among the three modalities (all P > 0.05). The weighted kappa values were 0.742-0.798.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Node-RADS demonstrated superior diagnostic performance over SAD measurements and similar diagnostic effectiveness in assessing LNI for primary rectal cancer stages across CE-CT, T2WI, and T1CE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"151 4\",\"pages\":\"145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009234/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06196-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06196-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:通过对比增强CT (CE-CT)、t2加权MRI (T2WI)和对比增强t1加权MRI (T1CE),评估淋巴结报告和数据系统(Node- rads)在直肠癌初始阶段诊断淋巴结累及(LNI)的效果。方法:回顾性研究113例直肠癌患者行根治性手术,未接受新辅助治疗。两名放射科医生使用最高的NODE-RADS分类和组织病理学作为参考标准独立评估区域淋巴结。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评价诊断效果。统计分析采用McNemar检验,多重比较采用Bonferroni校正。结果:节点- rads在所有模式下对短轴直径(SAD)的诊断性能均有改善(AUC: 0.838 vs. 0.744 CE-CT, 0.845 vs. 0.747 T2WI, 0.853 vs. 0.786 T1CE;P < 0.05)。加权kappa值为0.742 ~ 0.798。结论:Node-RADS在通过CE-CT、T2WI和T1CE评估原发性直肠癌分期的LNI方面表现出优于SAD测量的诊断效果,并且具有相似的诊断效果。
Diagnostic performance of node-RADS classification for primary lymph node assessment in rectal cancer: a modality benchmarking study.
Purpose: To evaluate how well the Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) diagnoses lymph node involvement (LNI) in the initial stages of rectal cancer, utilizing contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), T2-weighted MRI (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI (T1CE).
Methods: This retrospective study included 113 rectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. Two radiologists independently assessed regional lymph nodes using the highest NODE-RADS classification and histopathology as reference criteria. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the McNemar test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
Results: Node-RADS showed improved diagnostic performance over short-axis diameter (SAD) in all modalities (AUC: 0.838 vs. 0.744 for CE-CT, 0.845 vs. 0.747 for T2WI, 0.853 vs. 0.786 for T1CE; all P < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of Node-RADS across three modalities ranged from 76.19 - 78.57% and 91.55 - 92.96%, respectively. Pairwise comparisons of sensitivity and specificity among the three modalities showed no significant differences after Bonferroni correction (all McNemar test P = 1.0). There was no significant difference in Node-RADS performance among the three modalities (all P > 0.05). The weighted kappa values were 0.742-0.798.
Conclusion: Node-RADS demonstrated superior diagnostic performance over SAD measurements and similar diagnostic effectiveness in assessing LNI for primary rectal cancer stages across CE-CT, T2WI, and T1CE.
期刊介绍:
The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses.
The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.