Ohisa Harley, Yufilia Suci Amelia, Elsa Gustianty, Nanny N M Soetedjo, Arief S Kartasasmita
{"title":"探索白细胞差异计数比谱作为糖尿病视网膜病变炎症生物标志物:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ohisa Harley, Yufilia Suci Amelia, Elsa Gustianty, Nanny N M Soetedjo, Arief S Kartasasmita","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04075-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is increasingly prevalent and a major cause of irreversible blindness, particularly in developing countries. Limited access to ophthalmologists often leads to delayed diagnosis, emphasizing the need for more affordable and widely accessible screening methods to facilitate early identification. Recently, several studies have demonstrated variability in findings regarding the relationship between leukocyte differential count ratio biomarkers and DR. This study aims to investigate the association between leukocyte differential count ratios-NLR (Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio), PLR (Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio), MLR (Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio), and SII (Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index)-and the stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across several databases up to September 2024, with a focus on identifying studies examining the relationship between the leukocyte differential count ratio profiles and diabetic retinopathy. Review Manager was used to conduct the meta-analyses. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to assess the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38 studies were included in the systematic review and 27 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The mean differences in the NLR and PLR values were significantly different among the groups and were higher in the PDR group (0.68 (95%CI 0.42-0.95, p < 0.05) and 19.57 (95%CI 10.68-28.46, p < 0.05; respectively). These findings were followed by significant differences in SII value 202.53 (95% CI 196.19-208.86, p < 0.05). Moreover, the MLR values were not significantly different among the groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLR, PLR, and SII are associated with both the presence and progression of DR, with increasing levels of NLR and PLR reflecting a higher risk and severity of the disease. However, it is still necessary to justify the need to combine them with other clinical parameters to confirm the diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring leukocyte differential count ratio profiles as inflammatory biomarkers in diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ohisa Harley, Yufilia Suci Amelia, Elsa Gustianty, Nanny N M Soetedjo, Arief S Kartasasmita\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12886-025-04075-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is increasingly prevalent and a major cause of irreversible blindness, particularly in developing countries. Limited access to ophthalmologists often leads to delayed diagnosis, emphasizing the need for more affordable and widely accessible screening methods to facilitate early identification. Recently, several studies have demonstrated variability in findings regarding the relationship between leukocyte differential count ratio biomarkers and DR. This study aims to investigate the association between leukocyte differential count ratios-NLR (Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio), PLR (Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio), MLR (Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio), and SII (Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index)-and the stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across several databases up to September 2024, with a focus on identifying studies examining the relationship between the leukocyte differential count ratio profiles and diabetic retinopathy. Review Manager was used to conduct the meta-analyses. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to assess the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38 studies were included in the systematic review and 27 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The mean differences in the NLR and PLR values were significantly different among the groups and were higher in the PDR group (0.68 (95%CI 0.42-0.95, p < 0.05) and 19.57 (95%CI 10.68-28.46, p < 0.05; respectively). These findings were followed by significant differences in SII value 202.53 (95% CI 196.19-208.86, p < 0.05). Moreover, the MLR values were not significantly different among the groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLR, PLR, and SII are associated with both the presence and progression of DR, with increasing levels of NLR and PLR reflecting a higher risk and severity of the disease. However, it is still necessary to justify the need to combine them with other clinical parameters to confirm the diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044949/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04075-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04075-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)越来越普遍,是不可逆失明的主要原因,特别是在发展中国家。由于接触眼科医生的机会有限,往往导致诊断延误,因此需要更经济、更容易获得的筛查方法,以促进早期识别。最近,几项研究表明,白细胞差异计数比生物标志物与DR之间的关系存在差异。本研究旨在探讨白细胞差异计数比——中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(nlr)、血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比率(MLR)和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)——与糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)分期之间的关系。方法:截至2024年9月,对多个数据库进行了全面的文献检索,重点是确定白细胞差异计数比谱与糖尿病视网膜病变之间关系的研究。使用Review Manager进行meta分析。采用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表(NOS)对纳入的研究进行评估。结果:系统评价共纳入38项研究,meta分析纳入27项研究。NLR和PLR值在各组间的平均差异有统计学意义,PDR组的NLR和PLR值的平均差异为0.68 (95%CI 0.42 ~ 0.95, p 0.05)。结论:NLR、PLR和SII与DR的存在和进展相关,NLR和PLR水平的升高反映了疾病的高风险和严重程度。然而,仍有必要将其与其他临床参数相结合以证实诊断的必要性。
Exploring leukocyte differential count ratio profiles as inflammatory biomarkers in diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is increasingly prevalent and a major cause of irreversible blindness, particularly in developing countries. Limited access to ophthalmologists often leads to delayed diagnosis, emphasizing the need for more affordable and widely accessible screening methods to facilitate early identification. Recently, several studies have demonstrated variability in findings regarding the relationship between leukocyte differential count ratio biomarkers and DR. This study aims to investigate the association between leukocyte differential count ratios-NLR (Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio), PLR (Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio), MLR (Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio), and SII (Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index)-and the stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR).
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across several databases up to September 2024, with a focus on identifying studies examining the relationship between the leukocyte differential count ratio profiles and diabetic retinopathy. Review Manager was used to conduct the meta-analyses. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to assess the included studies.
Results: A total of 38 studies were included in the systematic review and 27 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The mean differences in the NLR and PLR values were significantly different among the groups and were higher in the PDR group (0.68 (95%CI 0.42-0.95, p < 0.05) and 19.57 (95%CI 10.68-28.46, p < 0.05; respectively). These findings were followed by significant differences in SII value 202.53 (95% CI 196.19-208.86, p < 0.05). Moreover, the MLR values were not significantly different among the groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: NLR, PLR, and SII are associated with both the presence and progression of DR, with increasing levels of NLR and PLR reflecting a higher risk and severity of the disease. However, it is still necessary to justify the need to combine them with other clinical parameters to confirm the diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.