{"title":"超声弹性成像鉴别乳腺微钙化良恶性的诊断效能:一项病例对照研究。","authors":"Jing Yan, Sisi Fang","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01638-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign breast microcalcifications through a case-control study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 300 female patients were enrolled in this study, equally divided between malignant (n = 150) and benign (n = 150) microcalcification groups. The malignant cases were histologically confirmed as ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer, while benign cases were confirmed through histology or follow-up as fibroadenoma, fibrocystic changes, or benign calcifications. Ultrasound elastography parameters, including elastic modulus (kPa), strain ratio, and elasticity scores, were measured and compared between groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using ROC curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Malignant lesions demonstrated significantly higher mean elasticity values compared to benign lesions (88.3 ± 16.2 kPa vs. 45.7 ± 9.8 kPa, P < 0.001). The strain ratio and elasticity scores were also significantly elevated in the malignant group (both P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified elastic modulus (OR = 1.09, 95%CI: 1.06-1.12, P < 0.001) and strain ratio (OR = 2.50, 95%CI: 1.70-3.80, P < 0.001) as independent predictors of malignancy. Using an optimal cutoff value of 62 kPa for elasticity, the diagnostic sensitivity was 88.0% (95%CI: 81.5-92.8%) and specificity was 86.7% (95%CI: 79.5-91.9%), with an accuracy of 89.0%. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for elasticity alone was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.92-0.98), which improved to 0.97 (95%CI: 0.94-0.99) when combined with strain ratio (P = 0.018). High interobserver agreement was demonstrated (Kappa = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.79-0.88), and Bland-Altman analysis confirmed excellent measurement reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound elastography demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between malignant and benign breast microcalcifications, with excellent reproducibility and reliability. The combination of elasticity values and strain ratio provides superior diagnostic performance compared to single parameters alone, suggesting its potential as a valuable tool in clinical practice for the evaluation of breast microcalcifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12023353/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography in differentiating malignant from benign breast microcalcifications: a case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Yan, Sisi Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12880-025-01638-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign breast microcalcifications through a case-control study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 300 female patients were enrolled in this study, equally divided between malignant (n = 150) and benign (n = 150) microcalcification groups. The malignant cases were histologically confirmed as ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer, while benign cases were confirmed through histology or follow-up as fibroadenoma, fibrocystic changes, or benign calcifications. Ultrasound elastography parameters, including elastic modulus (kPa), strain ratio, and elasticity scores, were measured and compared between groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using ROC curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Malignant lesions demonstrated significantly higher mean elasticity values compared to benign lesions (88.3 ± 16.2 kPa vs. 45.7 ± 9.8 kPa, P < 0.001). The strain ratio and elasticity scores were also significantly elevated in the malignant group (both P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified elastic modulus (OR = 1.09, 95%CI: 1.06-1.12, P < 0.001) and strain ratio (OR = 2.50, 95%CI: 1.70-3.80, P < 0.001) as independent predictors of malignancy. Using an optimal cutoff value of 62 kPa for elasticity, the diagnostic sensitivity was 88.0% (95%CI: 81.5-92.8%) and specificity was 86.7% (95%CI: 79.5-91.9%), with an accuracy of 89.0%. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for elasticity alone was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.92-0.98), which improved to 0.97 (95%CI: 0.94-0.99) when combined with strain ratio (P = 0.018). High interobserver agreement was demonstrated (Kappa = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.79-0.88), and Bland-Altman analysis confirmed excellent measurement reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound elastography demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between malignant and benign breast microcalcifications, with excellent reproducibility and reliability. The combination of elasticity values and strain ratio provides superior diagnostic performance compared to single parameters alone, suggesting its potential as a valuable tool in clinical practice for the evaluation of breast microcalcifications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12023353/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01638-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01638-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:通过病例对照研究,评价超声弹性成像鉴别乳腺微钙化良恶性的敏感性和特异性。方法:本研究共纳入300例女性患者,平均分为恶性(n = 150)和良性(n = 150)微钙化组。恶性病理证实为导管原位癌或浸润性乳腺癌,良性病理或随访证实为纤维腺瘤、纤维囊性变或良性钙化。测量两组超声弹性成像参数,包括弹性模量(kPa)、应变比、弹性评分。采用多元logistic回归分析确定独立预测因子,并采用ROC曲线分析评价诊断效果。结果:超声弹性成像对乳腺微钙化的鉴别诊断准确性高(88.3±16.2 kPa vs 45.7±9.8 kPa),重复性和可靠性高。与单一参数相比,弹性值和应变比的组合提供了更好的诊断性能,表明其在临床实践中有潜力作为评估乳房微钙化的有价值的工具。
Diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography in differentiating malignant from benign breast microcalcifications: a case-control study.
Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign breast microcalcifications through a case-control study.
Methods: A total of 300 female patients were enrolled in this study, equally divided between malignant (n = 150) and benign (n = 150) microcalcification groups. The malignant cases were histologically confirmed as ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer, while benign cases were confirmed through histology or follow-up as fibroadenoma, fibrocystic changes, or benign calcifications. Ultrasound elastography parameters, including elastic modulus (kPa), strain ratio, and elasticity scores, were measured and compared between groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using ROC curve analysis.
Results: Malignant lesions demonstrated significantly higher mean elasticity values compared to benign lesions (88.3 ± 16.2 kPa vs. 45.7 ± 9.8 kPa, P < 0.001). The strain ratio and elasticity scores were also significantly elevated in the malignant group (both P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified elastic modulus (OR = 1.09, 95%CI: 1.06-1.12, P < 0.001) and strain ratio (OR = 2.50, 95%CI: 1.70-3.80, P < 0.001) as independent predictors of malignancy. Using an optimal cutoff value of 62 kPa for elasticity, the diagnostic sensitivity was 88.0% (95%CI: 81.5-92.8%) and specificity was 86.7% (95%CI: 79.5-91.9%), with an accuracy of 89.0%. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for elasticity alone was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.92-0.98), which improved to 0.97 (95%CI: 0.94-0.99) when combined with strain ratio (P = 0.018). High interobserver agreement was demonstrated (Kappa = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.79-0.88), and Bland-Altman analysis confirmed excellent measurement reliability.
Conclusion: Ultrasound elastography demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between malignant and benign breast microcalcifications, with excellent reproducibility and reliability. The combination of elasticity values and strain ratio provides superior diagnostic performance compared to single parameters alone, suggesting its potential as a valuable tool in clinical practice for the evaluation of breast microcalcifications.
期刊介绍:
BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.