口腔癌手术切缘的风险分型:切缘与浸润深度之比分析。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17286-w
Chun-Yang Hung, Li-Jen Liao, Yu-Ping Cheng, Wan-Lun Hsu, Chun-Ju Chiang, Chun-Wei Chang, Wen-Chung Lee, Cheng-Ping Wang, Pei-Jen Lou, Yih-Leong Chang, Tseng-Cheng Chen
{"title":"口腔癌手术切缘的风险分型:切缘与浸润深度之比分析。","authors":"Chun-Yang Hung, Li-Jen Liao, Yu-Ping Cheng, Wan-Lun Hsu, Chun-Ju Chiang, Chun-Wei Chang, Wen-Chung Lee, Cheng-Ping Wang, Pei-Jen Lou, Yih-Leong Chang, Tseng-Cheng Chen","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17286-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A high-risk margin is a recurrence risk factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but its exact definition is debated. The effectiveness of the margin-to-depth-of-invasion ratio (MDR) in identifying high-risk margin remains to be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had a diagnosis of pT1-4N0 OSCC with negative margins (margin > 1 mm) recorded in the Taiwan Cancer Registry between January 2018 and December 2021 were reviewed. All patients were categorized into two groups: MDR < 0.5 and MDR ≥ 0.5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed 7420 OSCC patients without a positive margin. Of these 7420 patients, 4669 (62.92%) had an MDR ≥ 0.5, and 2751 (37.08%) had an MDR < 0.5. The group with an MDR < 0.5 exhibited significantly poorer 3-year disease-free survival (DFS, 74% vs 86%) and overall survival (OS, 79% vs 89%) than the group with an MDR ≥ 0.5. Despite a higher rate of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in the group with an MDR < 0.5, multivariate Cox analysis showed that patients with a margin < 5 mm and an MDR ≥ 0.5 had a significantly better DFS than those with a margin < 5 mm and an MDR < 0.5 (p = 0.001). Treatment with PORT improved DFS and OS for the patients with an MDR < 0.5, but worsened outcomes for the patients with an MDR ≥ 0.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For OSCC patients without positive margin, an MDR < 0.5 was associated with worse survival and higher locoregional recurrence risk. The patients with an MDR < 0.5 may benefit from PORT, whereas those with an MDR ≥ 0.5 could experience worse outcomes. An MDR < 0.5 could serve as a criterion for high-risk OSCC margin.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"5230-5242"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Classification of Oral Cancer Surgical Margins: Margin to Depth of Invasion Ratio Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chun-Yang Hung, Li-Jen Liao, Yu-Ping Cheng, Wan-Lun Hsu, Chun-Ju Chiang, Chun-Wei Chang, Wen-Chung Lee, Cheng-Ping Wang, Pei-Jen Lou, Yih-Leong Chang, Tseng-Cheng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-17286-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A high-risk margin is a recurrence risk factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but its exact definition is debated. The effectiveness of the margin-to-depth-of-invasion ratio (MDR) in identifying high-risk margin remains to be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had a diagnosis of pT1-4N0 OSCC with negative margins (margin > 1 mm) recorded in the Taiwan Cancer Registry between January 2018 and December 2021 were reviewed. All patients were categorized into two groups: MDR < 0.5 and MDR ≥ 0.5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed 7420 OSCC patients without a positive margin. Of these 7420 patients, 4669 (62.92%) had an MDR ≥ 0.5, and 2751 (37.08%) had an MDR < 0.5. The group with an MDR < 0.5 exhibited significantly poorer 3-year disease-free survival (DFS, 74% vs 86%) and overall survival (OS, 79% vs 89%) than the group with an MDR ≥ 0.5. Despite a higher rate of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in the group with an MDR < 0.5, multivariate Cox analysis showed that patients with a margin < 5 mm and an MDR ≥ 0.5 had a significantly better DFS than those with a margin < 5 mm and an MDR < 0.5 (p = 0.001). Treatment with PORT improved DFS and OS for the patients with an MDR < 0.5, but worsened outcomes for the patients with an MDR ≥ 0.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For OSCC patients without positive margin, an MDR < 0.5 was associated with worse survival and higher locoregional recurrence risk. The patients with an MDR < 0.5 may benefit from PORT, whereas those with an MDR ≥ 0.5 could experience worse outcomes. An MDR < 0.5 could serve as a criterion for high-risk OSCC margin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5230-5242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17286-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17286-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高危切缘是口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)复发的危险因素,但其确切定义存在争议。边缘-浸润深度比(MDR)在识别高风险边缘的有效性仍有待确定。方法:回顾2018年1月至2021年12月在台湾癌症登记处记录的诊断为pT1-4N0伴有阴性切缘(切缘>.1 mm)的OSCC患者。结果:该研究分析了7420例无阳性边缘的OSCC患者。7420例患者中,4669例(62.92%)MDR≥0.5,2751例(37.08%)存在MDR。结论:无阳性切缘的OSCC患者为MDR
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Classification of Oral Cancer Surgical Margins: Margin to Depth of Invasion Ratio Analysis.

Background: A high-risk margin is a recurrence risk factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but its exact definition is debated. The effectiveness of the margin-to-depth-of-invasion ratio (MDR) in identifying high-risk margin remains to be determined.

Methods: Patients who had a diagnosis of pT1-4N0 OSCC with negative margins (margin > 1 mm) recorded in the Taiwan Cancer Registry between January 2018 and December 2021 were reviewed. All patients were categorized into two groups: MDR < 0.5 and MDR ≥ 0.5.

Results: The study analyzed 7420 OSCC patients without a positive margin. Of these 7420 patients, 4669 (62.92%) had an MDR ≥ 0.5, and 2751 (37.08%) had an MDR < 0.5. The group with an MDR < 0.5 exhibited significantly poorer 3-year disease-free survival (DFS, 74% vs 86%) and overall survival (OS, 79% vs 89%) than the group with an MDR ≥ 0.5. Despite a higher rate of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in the group with an MDR < 0.5, multivariate Cox analysis showed that patients with a margin < 5 mm and an MDR ≥ 0.5 had a significantly better DFS than those with a margin < 5 mm and an MDR < 0.5 (p = 0.001). Treatment with PORT improved DFS and OS for the patients with an MDR < 0.5, but worsened outcomes for the patients with an MDR ≥ 0.5.

Conclusion: For OSCC patients without positive margin, an MDR < 0.5 was associated with worse survival and higher locoregional recurrence risk. The patients with an MDR < 0.5 may benefit from PORT, whereas those with an MDR ≥ 0.5 could experience worse outcomes. An MDR < 0.5 could serve as a criterion for high-risk OSCC margin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信