{"title":"口腔癌手术切缘的风险分型:切缘与浸润深度之比分析。","authors":"Chun-Yang Hung, Li-Jen Liao, Yu-Ping Cheng, Wan-Lun Hsu, Chun-Ju Chiang, Chun-Wei Chang, Wen-Chung Lee, Cheng-Ping Wang, Pei-Jen Lou, Yih-Leong Chang, Tseng-Cheng Chen","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17286-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A high-risk margin is a recurrence risk factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but its exact definition is debated. The effectiveness of the margin-to-depth-of-invasion ratio (MDR) in identifying high-risk margin remains to be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had a diagnosis of pT1-4N0 OSCC with negative margins (margin > 1 mm) recorded in the Taiwan Cancer Registry between January 2018 and December 2021 were reviewed. All patients were categorized into two groups: MDR < 0.5 and MDR ≥ 0.5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed 7420 OSCC patients without a positive margin. Of these 7420 patients, 4669 (62.92%) had an MDR ≥ 0.5, and 2751 (37.08%) had an MDR < 0.5. The group with an MDR < 0.5 exhibited significantly poorer 3-year disease-free survival (DFS, 74% vs 86%) and overall survival (OS, 79% vs 89%) than the group with an MDR ≥ 0.5. Despite a higher rate of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in the group with an MDR < 0.5, multivariate Cox analysis showed that patients with a margin < 5 mm and an MDR ≥ 0.5 had a significantly better DFS than those with a margin < 5 mm and an MDR < 0.5 (p = 0.001). Treatment with PORT improved DFS and OS for the patients with an MDR < 0.5, but worsened outcomes for the patients with an MDR ≥ 0.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For OSCC patients without positive margin, an MDR < 0.5 was associated with worse survival and higher locoregional recurrence risk. The patients with an MDR < 0.5 may benefit from PORT, whereas those with an MDR ≥ 0.5 could experience worse outcomes. An MDR < 0.5 could serve as a criterion for high-risk OSCC margin.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"5230-5242"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Classification of Oral Cancer Surgical Margins: Margin to Depth of Invasion Ratio Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chun-Yang Hung, Li-Jen Liao, Yu-Ping Cheng, Wan-Lun Hsu, Chun-Ju Chiang, Chun-Wei Chang, Wen-Chung Lee, Cheng-Ping Wang, Pei-Jen Lou, Yih-Leong Chang, Tseng-Cheng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-17286-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A high-risk margin is a recurrence risk factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but its exact definition is debated. The effectiveness of the margin-to-depth-of-invasion ratio (MDR) in identifying high-risk margin remains to be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had a diagnosis of pT1-4N0 OSCC with negative margins (margin > 1 mm) recorded in the Taiwan Cancer Registry between January 2018 and December 2021 were reviewed. All patients were categorized into two groups: MDR < 0.5 and MDR ≥ 0.5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed 7420 OSCC patients without a positive margin. Of these 7420 patients, 4669 (62.92%) had an MDR ≥ 0.5, and 2751 (37.08%) had an MDR < 0.5. The group with an MDR < 0.5 exhibited significantly poorer 3-year disease-free survival (DFS, 74% vs 86%) and overall survival (OS, 79% vs 89%) than the group with an MDR ≥ 0.5. Despite a higher rate of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in the group with an MDR < 0.5, multivariate Cox analysis showed that patients with a margin < 5 mm and an MDR ≥ 0.5 had a significantly better DFS than those with a margin < 5 mm and an MDR < 0.5 (p = 0.001). Treatment with PORT improved DFS and OS for the patients with an MDR < 0.5, but worsened outcomes for the patients with an MDR ≥ 0.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For OSCC patients without positive margin, an MDR < 0.5 was associated with worse survival and higher locoregional recurrence risk. The patients with an MDR < 0.5 may benefit from PORT, whereas those with an MDR ≥ 0.5 could experience worse outcomes. An MDR < 0.5 could serve as a criterion for high-risk OSCC margin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5230-5242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17286-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17286-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk Classification of Oral Cancer Surgical Margins: Margin to Depth of Invasion Ratio Analysis.
Background: A high-risk margin is a recurrence risk factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but its exact definition is debated. The effectiveness of the margin-to-depth-of-invasion ratio (MDR) in identifying high-risk margin remains to be determined.
Methods: Patients who had a diagnosis of pT1-4N0 OSCC with negative margins (margin > 1 mm) recorded in the Taiwan Cancer Registry between January 2018 and December 2021 were reviewed. All patients were categorized into two groups: MDR < 0.5 and MDR ≥ 0.5.
Results: The study analyzed 7420 OSCC patients without a positive margin. Of these 7420 patients, 4669 (62.92%) had an MDR ≥ 0.5, and 2751 (37.08%) had an MDR < 0.5. The group with an MDR < 0.5 exhibited significantly poorer 3-year disease-free survival (DFS, 74% vs 86%) and overall survival (OS, 79% vs 89%) than the group with an MDR ≥ 0.5. Despite a higher rate of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in the group with an MDR < 0.5, multivariate Cox analysis showed that patients with a margin < 5 mm and an MDR ≥ 0.5 had a significantly better DFS than those with a margin < 5 mm and an MDR < 0.5 (p = 0.001). Treatment with PORT improved DFS and OS for the patients with an MDR < 0.5, but worsened outcomes for the patients with an MDR ≥ 0.5.
Conclusion: For OSCC patients without positive margin, an MDR < 0.5 was associated with worse survival and higher locoregional recurrence risk. The patients with an MDR < 0.5 may benefit from PORT, whereas those with an MDR ≥ 0.5 could experience worse outcomes. An MDR < 0.5 could serve as a criterion for high-risk OSCC margin.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.