锥形束系统中几何拼接误差的临床前评估:脊柱负重CT成像的可能含义。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Anouk E Ree, Jules Cool, Geert J Streekstra, Johannes Gg Dobbe, Mario Maas, Barend J van Royen, Vesa Vahtila, Ruud Hh Wellenberg
{"title":"锥形束系统中几何拼接误差的临床前评估:脊柱负重CT成像的可能含义。","authors":"Anouk E Ree, Jules Cool, Geert J Streekstra, Johannes Gg Dobbe, Mario Maas, Barend J van Royen, Vesa Vahtila, Ruud Hh Wellenberg","doi":"10.1177/02841851251331123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundTotal body cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is recently developed for both weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine. Before whole-spine weight-bearing CT is used in clinical practice, potential errors must be addressed, such as the need to stitch multiple volumes due to the field-of-view limitations of CBCT technology.PurposeTo determine the geometric error of fused CBCT images of the spine using automatic stitching software.Material and MethodsIn total, 144 CBCT scans were obtained using three human cadavers. The geometric stitching error was determined in terms of total translation and rotation between vertebrae Th12 and L5, which were positioned in separate image volumes, with a regular spiral CT scan as a reference. The effect of cadaver size, radiation dose, and volume overlap between adjacent CBCT images on the stitching error was determined using Spearman's rank correlation test.ResultsThe median total translation and rotation error were 1.88 mm (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.48-2.42 mm) and 0.54° (IQR = 0.35°-0.63°), respectively. A weak negative correlation between the different volumes of overlap and total translation (<i>r</i> = -0.396; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and rotation (<i>r</i> = -0.319; <i>P</i> < 0.001) was found, as well as a weak positive correlation between the cadaver size and total translation (<i>r</i> = 0.456; <i>P</i> < 0.001).ConclusionThe results of this cadaver study showed stitching errors in the order of 2 mm for translation and 0.5° for rotation in fused CBCT volumes of the spine. These findings function as a relevant step towards the clinical and quantitative application of whole-spine weight-bearing CT imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851251331123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pre-clinical evaluation of geometrical stitching errors in a cone beam system: possible implications for weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine.\",\"authors\":\"Anouk E Ree, Jules Cool, Geert J Streekstra, Johannes Gg Dobbe, Mario Maas, Barend J van Royen, Vesa Vahtila, Ruud Hh Wellenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02841851251331123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundTotal body cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is recently developed for both weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine. Before whole-spine weight-bearing CT is used in clinical practice, potential errors must be addressed, such as the need to stitch multiple volumes due to the field-of-view limitations of CBCT technology.PurposeTo determine the geometric error of fused CBCT images of the spine using automatic stitching software.Material and MethodsIn total, 144 CBCT scans were obtained using three human cadavers. The geometric stitching error was determined in terms of total translation and rotation between vertebrae Th12 and L5, which were positioned in separate image volumes, with a regular spiral CT scan as a reference. The effect of cadaver size, radiation dose, and volume overlap between adjacent CBCT images on the stitching error was determined using Spearman's rank correlation test.ResultsThe median total translation and rotation error were 1.88 mm (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.48-2.42 mm) and 0.54° (IQR = 0.35°-0.63°), respectively. A weak negative correlation between the different volumes of overlap and total translation (<i>r</i> = -0.396; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and rotation (<i>r</i> = -0.319; <i>P</i> < 0.001) was found, as well as a weak positive correlation between the cadaver size and total translation (<i>r</i> = 0.456; <i>P</i> < 0.001).ConclusionThe results of this cadaver study showed stitching errors in the order of 2 mm for translation and 0.5° for rotation in fused CBCT volumes of the spine. These findings function as a relevant step towards the clinical and quantitative application of whole-spine weight-bearing CT imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2841851251331123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251331123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251331123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景全身锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)是最近发展起来的用于脊柱负重和非负重CT成像的技术。在全脊柱负重CT应用于临床实践之前,必须解决潜在的错误,例如由于CBCT技术的视野限制,需要缝合多个体积。目的利用自动拼接软件确定脊柱CBCT图像融合后的几何误差。材料与方法共获得3具尸体的144张CBCT扫描图。几何拼接误差是根据Th12和L5椎体之间的总平移和旋转来确定的,这两个椎体位于单独的图像体积中,并以常规螺旋CT扫描作为参考。采用Spearman秩相关检验确定尸体大小、辐射剂量和相邻CBCT图像之间的体积重叠对拼接误差的影响。结果总平移和旋转误差中位数分别为1.88 mm(四分位间距[IQR] = 1.48 ~ 2.42 mm)和0.54°(四分位间距[IQR] = 0.35°~ 0.63°)。不同重叠量与总翻译量呈弱负相关(r = -0.396;P r = -0.319;P r = 0.456;P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A pre-clinical evaluation of geometrical stitching errors in a cone beam system: possible implications for weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine.

BackgroundTotal body cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is recently developed for both weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine. Before whole-spine weight-bearing CT is used in clinical practice, potential errors must be addressed, such as the need to stitch multiple volumes due to the field-of-view limitations of CBCT technology.PurposeTo determine the geometric error of fused CBCT images of the spine using automatic stitching software.Material and MethodsIn total, 144 CBCT scans were obtained using three human cadavers. The geometric stitching error was determined in terms of total translation and rotation between vertebrae Th12 and L5, which were positioned in separate image volumes, with a regular spiral CT scan as a reference. The effect of cadaver size, radiation dose, and volume overlap between adjacent CBCT images on the stitching error was determined using Spearman's rank correlation test.ResultsThe median total translation and rotation error were 1.88 mm (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.48-2.42 mm) and 0.54° (IQR = 0.35°-0.63°), respectively. A weak negative correlation between the different volumes of overlap and total translation (r = -0.396; P < 0.001) and rotation (r = -0.319; P < 0.001) was found, as well as a weak positive correlation between the cadaver size and total translation (r = 0.456; P < 0.001).ConclusionThe results of this cadaver study showed stitching errors in the order of 2 mm for translation and 0.5° for rotation in fused CBCT volumes of the spine. These findings function as a relevant step towards the clinical and quantitative application of whole-spine weight-bearing CT imaging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信