Anouk E Ree, Jules Cool, Geert J Streekstra, Johannes Gg Dobbe, Mario Maas, Barend J van Royen, Vesa Vahtila, Ruud Hh Wellenberg
{"title":"锥形束系统中几何拼接误差的临床前评估:脊柱负重CT成像的可能含义。","authors":"Anouk E Ree, Jules Cool, Geert J Streekstra, Johannes Gg Dobbe, Mario Maas, Barend J van Royen, Vesa Vahtila, Ruud Hh Wellenberg","doi":"10.1177/02841851251331123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundTotal body cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is recently developed for both weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine. Before whole-spine weight-bearing CT is used in clinical practice, potential errors must be addressed, such as the need to stitch multiple volumes due to the field-of-view limitations of CBCT technology.PurposeTo determine the geometric error of fused CBCT images of the spine using automatic stitching software.Material and MethodsIn total, 144 CBCT scans were obtained using three human cadavers. The geometric stitching error was determined in terms of total translation and rotation between vertebrae Th12 and L5, which were positioned in separate image volumes, with a regular spiral CT scan as a reference. The effect of cadaver size, radiation dose, and volume overlap between adjacent CBCT images on the stitching error was determined using Spearman's rank correlation test.ResultsThe median total translation and rotation error were 1.88 mm (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.48-2.42 mm) and 0.54° (IQR = 0.35°-0.63°), respectively. A weak negative correlation between the different volumes of overlap and total translation (<i>r</i> = -0.396; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and rotation (<i>r</i> = -0.319; <i>P</i> < 0.001) was found, as well as a weak positive correlation between the cadaver size and total translation (<i>r</i> = 0.456; <i>P</i> < 0.001).ConclusionThe results of this cadaver study showed stitching errors in the order of 2 mm for translation and 0.5° for rotation in fused CBCT volumes of the spine. These findings function as a relevant step towards the clinical and quantitative application of whole-spine weight-bearing CT imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851251331123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pre-clinical evaluation of geometrical stitching errors in a cone beam system: possible implications for weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine.\",\"authors\":\"Anouk E Ree, Jules Cool, Geert J Streekstra, Johannes Gg Dobbe, Mario Maas, Barend J van Royen, Vesa Vahtila, Ruud Hh Wellenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02841851251331123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundTotal body cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is recently developed for both weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine. Before whole-spine weight-bearing CT is used in clinical practice, potential errors must be addressed, such as the need to stitch multiple volumes due to the field-of-view limitations of CBCT technology.PurposeTo determine the geometric error of fused CBCT images of the spine using automatic stitching software.Material and MethodsIn total, 144 CBCT scans were obtained using three human cadavers. The geometric stitching error was determined in terms of total translation and rotation between vertebrae Th12 and L5, which were positioned in separate image volumes, with a regular spiral CT scan as a reference. The effect of cadaver size, radiation dose, and volume overlap between adjacent CBCT images on the stitching error was determined using Spearman's rank correlation test.ResultsThe median total translation and rotation error were 1.88 mm (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.48-2.42 mm) and 0.54° (IQR = 0.35°-0.63°), respectively. A weak negative correlation between the different volumes of overlap and total translation (<i>r</i> = -0.396; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and rotation (<i>r</i> = -0.319; <i>P</i> < 0.001) was found, as well as a weak positive correlation between the cadaver size and total translation (<i>r</i> = 0.456; <i>P</i> < 0.001).ConclusionThe results of this cadaver study showed stitching errors in the order of 2 mm for translation and 0.5° for rotation in fused CBCT volumes of the spine. These findings function as a relevant step towards the clinical and quantitative application of whole-spine weight-bearing CT imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2841851251331123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251331123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251331123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景全身锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)是最近发展起来的用于脊柱负重和非负重CT成像的技术。在全脊柱负重CT应用于临床实践之前,必须解决潜在的错误,例如由于CBCT技术的视野限制,需要缝合多个体积。目的利用自动拼接软件确定脊柱CBCT图像融合后的几何误差。材料与方法共获得3具尸体的144张CBCT扫描图。几何拼接误差是根据Th12和L5椎体之间的总平移和旋转来确定的,这两个椎体位于单独的图像体积中,并以常规螺旋CT扫描作为参考。采用Spearman秩相关检验确定尸体大小、辐射剂量和相邻CBCT图像之间的体积重叠对拼接误差的影响。结果总平移和旋转误差中位数分别为1.88 mm(四分位间距[IQR] = 1.48 ~ 2.42 mm)和0.54°(四分位间距[IQR] = 0.35°~ 0.63°)。不同重叠量与总翻译量呈弱负相关(r = -0.396;P r = -0.319;P r = 0.456;P
A pre-clinical evaluation of geometrical stitching errors in a cone beam system: possible implications for weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine.
BackgroundTotal body cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is recently developed for both weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine. Before whole-spine weight-bearing CT is used in clinical practice, potential errors must be addressed, such as the need to stitch multiple volumes due to the field-of-view limitations of CBCT technology.PurposeTo determine the geometric error of fused CBCT images of the spine using automatic stitching software.Material and MethodsIn total, 144 CBCT scans were obtained using three human cadavers. The geometric stitching error was determined in terms of total translation and rotation between vertebrae Th12 and L5, which were positioned in separate image volumes, with a regular spiral CT scan as a reference. The effect of cadaver size, radiation dose, and volume overlap between adjacent CBCT images on the stitching error was determined using Spearman's rank correlation test.ResultsThe median total translation and rotation error were 1.88 mm (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.48-2.42 mm) and 0.54° (IQR = 0.35°-0.63°), respectively. A weak negative correlation between the different volumes of overlap and total translation (r = -0.396; P < 0.001) and rotation (r = -0.319; P < 0.001) was found, as well as a weak positive correlation between the cadaver size and total translation (r = 0.456; P < 0.001).ConclusionThe results of this cadaver study showed stitching errors in the order of 2 mm for translation and 0.5° for rotation in fused CBCT volumes of the spine. These findings function as a relevant step towards the clinical and quantitative application of whole-spine weight-bearing CT imaging.
期刊介绍:
Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.