预防中心线相关血流感染的数字化措施:范围综述

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Basilice Minka Obama, Rebecca Grant, Stephan Harbarth, Niccolò Buetti, Gaud Catho
{"title":"预防中心线相关血流感染的数字化措施:范围综述","authors":"Basilice Minka Obama, Rebecca Grant, Stephan Harbarth, Niccolò Buetti, Gaud Catho","doi":"10.1186/s13756-025-01549-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) increase morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs of hospitalised patients, despite being largely preventable. While evidence-based guidelines for preventing CLABSI are well-established, the implementation of these measures remain suboptimal. Digitalization presents a promising approach to improve guideline adherence, streamline implementation processes, and ultimately reduce CLABSI rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review aims to synthesize the available evidence on digitalised interventions for the prevention of CLABSI. A systematic search was conducted using Medline to identify studies published between January 1, 2014, and March 20, 2024, that reported on the implementation of digitalised preventive measures for CLABSI and evaluated their impact on CLABSI rates. Data extraction included study characteristics, features of the digitalised preventive measures, effectiveness in reducing CLABSI rates, and relevant process outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A systematic search yielded 263 articles, of which six studies were included. Digitalised interventions were predominantly designed for use by nurses in tertiary-level hospitals (n = 6), primarily in intensive care units (n = 5) and targeted pediatric patient populations (n = 5). These measures were often implemented as part of multimodal strategies. The digital interventions included hospital dashboards (n = 2), mobile applications (n = 2), automatic notifications of catheter days (n = 1), and e-learning modules with electronic reminders (n = 1). The most common study design was quasi-experimental without an external control group. All included studies reported a reduction in CLABSI rates, ranging from 21 to 73%. Healthcare workers generally perceived these digital interventions positively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Digitalised interventions for CLABSI prevention seem to be effective in reducing infection rates, likely because of increasing compliance to established guidelines for CLABSI prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":"14 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digitalised measures for the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Basilice Minka Obama, Rebecca Grant, Stephan Harbarth, Niccolò Buetti, Gaud Catho\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13756-025-01549-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) increase morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs of hospitalised patients, despite being largely preventable. While evidence-based guidelines for preventing CLABSI are well-established, the implementation of these measures remain suboptimal. Digitalization presents a promising approach to improve guideline adherence, streamline implementation processes, and ultimately reduce CLABSI rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review aims to synthesize the available evidence on digitalised interventions for the prevention of CLABSI. A systematic search was conducted using Medline to identify studies published between January 1, 2014, and March 20, 2024, that reported on the implementation of digitalised preventive measures for CLABSI and evaluated their impact on CLABSI rates. Data extraction included study characteristics, features of the digitalised preventive measures, effectiveness in reducing CLABSI rates, and relevant process outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A systematic search yielded 263 articles, of which six studies were included. Digitalised interventions were predominantly designed for use by nurses in tertiary-level hospitals (n = 6), primarily in intensive care units (n = 5) and targeted pediatric patient populations (n = 5). These measures were often implemented as part of multimodal strategies. The digital interventions included hospital dashboards (n = 2), mobile applications (n = 2), automatic notifications of catheter days (n = 1), and e-learning modules with electronic reminders (n = 1). The most common study design was quasi-experimental without an external control group. All included studies reported a reduction in CLABSI rates, ranging from 21 to 73%. Healthcare workers generally perceived these digital interventions positively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Digitalised interventions for CLABSI prevention seem to be effective in reducing infection rates, likely because of increasing compliance to established guidelines for CLABSI prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067738/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01549-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01549-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中心静脉相关血流感染(CLABSI)增加了住院患者的发病率、死亡率和医疗费用,尽管在很大程度上是可以预防的。虽然预防CLABSI的循证指南已经建立,但这些措施的实施仍然不够理想。数字化提出了一种很有前途的方法,可以提高指南的依从性,简化实施过程,并最终降低CLABSI率。方法:本综述旨在综合有关预防CLABSI的数字化干预措施的现有证据。使用Medline进行了系统检索,以确定2014年1月1日至2024年3月20日之间发表的研究,这些研究报告了CLABSI的数字化预防措施的实施,并评估了它们对CLABSI发病率的影响。数据提取包括研究特征、数字化预防措施的特征、降低CLABSI率的有效性以及相关的过程结果。结果:系统检索得到263篇文章,其中纳入6篇研究。数字化干预措施主要设计用于三级医院(n = 6)的护士,主要用于重症监护病房(n = 5)和目标儿科患者人群(n = 5)。这些措施往往作为多式联运战略的一部分加以执行。数字干预措施包括医院仪表板(n = 2)、移动应用程序(n = 2)、自动通知导尿天数(n = 1)和带电子提醒的电子学习模块(n = 1)。最常见的研究设计是准实验,没有外部对照组。所有纳入的研究均报告CLABSI发生率降低,从21%到73%不等。卫生保健工作者普遍认为这些数字干预措施是积极的。讨论:预防CLABSI的数字化干预措施似乎在降低感染率方面是有效的,可能是因为增加了对CLABSI预防指南的遵守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digitalised measures for the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections: a scoping review.

Background: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) increase morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs of hospitalised patients, despite being largely preventable. While evidence-based guidelines for preventing CLABSI are well-established, the implementation of these measures remain suboptimal. Digitalization presents a promising approach to improve guideline adherence, streamline implementation processes, and ultimately reduce CLABSI rates.

Methods: This scoping review aims to synthesize the available evidence on digitalised interventions for the prevention of CLABSI. A systematic search was conducted using Medline to identify studies published between January 1, 2014, and March 20, 2024, that reported on the implementation of digitalised preventive measures for CLABSI and evaluated their impact on CLABSI rates. Data extraction included study characteristics, features of the digitalised preventive measures, effectiveness in reducing CLABSI rates, and relevant process outcomes.

Results: A systematic search yielded 263 articles, of which six studies were included. Digitalised interventions were predominantly designed for use by nurses in tertiary-level hospitals (n = 6), primarily in intensive care units (n = 5) and targeted pediatric patient populations (n = 5). These measures were often implemented as part of multimodal strategies. The digital interventions included hospital dashboards (n = 2), mobile applications (n = 2), automatic notifications of catheter days (n = 1), and e-learning modules with electronic reminders (n = 1). The most common study design was quasi-experimental without an external control group. All included studies reported a reduction in CLABSI rates, ranging from 21 to 73%. Healthcare workers generally perceived these digital interventions positively.

Discussion: Digitalised interventions for CLABSI prevention seem to be effective in reducing infection rates, likely because of increasing compliance to established guidelines for CLABSI prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
140
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信