VITACORA- 19和PsAID问卷对于评估银屑病关节炎对患者生活质量的影响同样有效。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Ignacio Braña, Marta Loredo, Juan Carlos Torre-Alonso, Rubén Queiro
{"title":"VITACORA- 19和PsAID问卷对于评估银屑病关节炎对患者生活质量的影响同样有效。","authors":"Ignacio Braña, Marta Loredo, Juan Carlos Torre-Alonso, Rubén Queiro","doi":"10.1007/s10067-025-07446-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an often-underestimated aspect in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We aimed to compare the VITACORA-19 and PsAID (Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease) questionnaires to assess QoL in routine PsA management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of a randomly selected PsA population. Disease activity was estimated using the DAPSA (Disease Activity score for PsA) index and HRQoL using the VITACORA-19 and PsAID. The construct validity of VITACORA-19 was analysed (Pearson correlation and ROC curves).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five patients were included, 24 men and 21 women, mean age 55 ± 13 years, mean disease duration 8.2 ± 6.1 years. Most patients showed adequate disease control, median DAPSA 11.3 (IQR: 8.0-19.3), median PsAID 2.7 (IQR: 1.1-5.0). VITACORA-19 scores ranged from 6 to 94. The correlation between VITACORA-19 and PsAID was high, r: -0.7 (95%CI: -0.84 to -0.46), p < 0.0001. A VITACORA-19 score in the range of 6-29 corresponded to high DAPSA disease activity, a range of 30-44 corresponded to moderate DAPSA activity and a range of 45-95 corresponded to low DAPSA activity. The cut-off for an acceptable symptomatic state (PsAID < 4) corresponded to a VITACORA-19 score ≥ 66 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.71-0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study comparing the VITACORA-19 and PsAID questionnaires. Either of the two questionnaires could be used to assess HRQoL in PsA. For the first time, VITACORA-19 thresholds are defined that identify the different DAPSA activity categories. A VITACORA-19 score ≥ 66 could be an appropriate treatment target. Key Points • Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an often-underestimated aspect in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). • The PsAID and VITACORA-19 questionnaires offer similar performance for assessing HRQoL in PsA. • A VITACORA-19 ≥ 66 identifies the low disease impact state according to the PsAID. • VITACORA-19 thresholds identifying DAPSA categories are reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":10482,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The VITACORA- 19 and PsAID questionnaires are equally valid for assessing the impact of psoriatic arthritis on patients' quality of life.\",\"authors\":\"Ignacio Braña, Marta Loredo, Juan Carlos Torre-Alonso, Rubén Queiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10067-025-07446-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an often-underestimated aspect in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We aimed to compare the VITACORA-19 and PsAID (Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease) questionnaires to assess QoL in routine PsA management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of a randomly selected PsA population. Disease activity was estimated using the DAPSA (Disease Activity score for PsA) index and HRQoL using the VITACORA-19 and PsAID. The construct validity of VITACORA-19 was analysed (Pearson correlation and ROC curves).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five patients were included, 24 men and 21 women, mean age 55 ± 13 years, mean disease duration 8.2 ± 6.1 years. Most patients showed adequate disease control, median DAPSA 11.3 (IQR: 8.0-19.3), median PsAID 2.7 (IQR: 1.1-5.0). VITACORA-19 scores ranged from 6 to 94. The correlation between VITACORA-19 and PsAID was high, r: -0.7 (95%CI: -0.84 to -0.46), p < 0.0001. A VITACORA-19 score in the range of 6-29 corresponded to high DAPSA disease activity, a range of 30-44 corresponded to moderate DAPSA activity and a range of 45-95 corresponded to low DAPSA activity. The cut-off for an acceptable symptomatic state (PsAID < 4) corresponded to a VITACORA-19 score ≥ 66 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.71-0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study comparing the VITACORA-19 and PsAID questionnaires. Either of the two questionnaires could be used to assess HRQoL in PsA. For the first time, VITACORA-19 thresholds are defined that identify the different DAPSA activity categories. A VITACORA-19 score ≥ 66 could be an appropriate treatment target. Key Points • Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an often-underestimated aspect in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). • The PsAID and VITACORA-19 questionnaires offer similar performance for assessing HRQoL in PsA. • A VITACORA-19 ≥ 66 identifies the low disease impact state according to the PsAID. • VITACORA-19 thresholds identifying DAPSA categories are reported.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-025-07446-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-025-07446-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)是银屑病关节炎(PsA)中一个经常被低估的方面。我们的目的是比较VITACORA-19和PsAID(银屑病关节炎对疾病的影响)问卷来评估常规PsA治疗的生活质量。方法:随机选择PsA人群进行横断面分析。使用DAPSA (PsA疾病活动评分)指数评估疾病活动性,使用VITACORA-19和PsAID评估HRQoL。分析VITACORA-19的结构效度(Pearson相关和ROC曲线)。结果:纳入患者45例,男24例,女21例,平均年龄55±13岁,平均病程8.2±6.1年。大多数患者疾病控制良好,中位DAPSA 11.3 (IQR: 8.0-19.3),中位PsAID 2.7 (IQR: 1.1-5.0)。VITACORA-19评分从6到94分不等。VITACORA-19和PsAID的相关性很高,r: -0.7 (95%CI: -0.84至-0.46),p结论:这是第一个比较VITACORA-19和PsAID问卷的研究。两种问卷均可用于评估PsA患者的HRQoL。首次定义了VITACORA-19阈值,用于识别不同的DAPSA活性类别。VITACORA-19评分≥66可能是合适的治疗目标。•与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)是银屑病关节炎(PsA)中经常被低估的一个方面。•PsAID和VITACORA-19问卷在评估PsA患者HRQoL方面的表现相似。•根据PsAID, VITACORA-19≥66表示低疾病影响状态。•报告识别DAPSA类别的VITACORA-19阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The VITACORA- 19 and PsAID questionnaires are equally valid for assessing the impact of psoriatic arthritis on patients' quality of life.

Background and aims: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an often-underestimated aspect in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We aimed to compare the VITACORA-19 and PsAID (Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease) questionnaires to assess QoL in routine PsA management.

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of a randomly selected PsA population. Disease activity was estimated using the DAPSA (Disease Activity score for PsA) index and HRQoL using the VITACORA-19 and PsAID. The construct validity of VITACORA-19 was analysed (Pearson correlation and ROC curves).

Results: Forty-five patients were included, 24 men and 21 women, mean age 55 ± 13 years, mean disease duration 8.2 ± 6.1 years. Most patients showed adequate disease control, median DAPSA 11.3 (IQR: 8.0-19.3), median PsAID 2.7 (IQR: 1.1-5.0). VITACORA-19 scores ranged from 6 to 94. The correlation between VITACORA-19 and PsAID was high, r: -0.7 (95%CI: -0.84 to -0.46), p < 0.0001. A VITACORA-19 score in the range of 6-29 corresponded to high DAPSA disease activity, a range of 30-44 corresponded to moderate DAPSA activity and a range of 45-95 corresponded to low DAPSA activity. The cut-off for an acceptable symptomatic state (PsAID < 4) corresponded to a VITACORA-19 score ≥ 66 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.71-0.98).

Conclusions: This is the first study comparing the VITACORA-19 and PsAID questionnaires. Either of the two questionnaires could be used to assess HRQoL in PsA. For the first time, VITACORA-19 thresholds are defined that identify the different DAPSA activity categories. A VITACORA-19 score ≥ 66 could be an appropriate treatment target. Key Points • Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an often-underestimated aspect in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). • The PsAID and VITACORA-19 questionnaires offer similar performance for assessing HRQoL in PsA. • A VITACORA-19 ≥ 66 identifies the low disease impact state according to the PsAID. • VITACORA-19 thresholds identifying DAPSA categories are reported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rheumatology
Clinical Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
441
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Rheumatology is an international English-language journal devoted to publishing original clinical investigation and research in the general field of rheumatology with accent on clinical aspects at postgraduate level. The journal succeeds Acta Rheumatologica Belgica, originally founded in 1945 as the official journal of the Belgian Rheumatology Society. Clinical Rheumatology aims to cover all modern trends in clinical and experimental research as well as the management and evaluation of diagnostic and treatment procedures connected with the inflammatory, immunologic, metabolic, genetic and degenerative soft and hard connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信