眼窝减压治疗甲状腺眼病:术前严重程度和技术的结果。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1177/19458924251330947
Lazaro R Peraza, Forrest W Fearington, Gabriel A Hernandez-Herrerra, Andrew S Awadallah, Lilly H Wagner, Andrea A Tooley, Elizabeth A Bradley, Marius N Stan, Janalee K Stokken
{"title":"眼窝减压治疗甲状腺眼病:术前严重程度和技术的结果。","authors":"Lazaro R Peraza, Forrest W Fearington, Gabriel A Hernandez-Herrerra, Andrew S Awadallah, Lilly H Wagner, Andrea A Tooley, Elizabeth A Bradley, Marius N Stan, Janalee K Stokken","doi":"10.1177/19458924251330947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundOrbital decompression is an essential tool for reducing proptosis in thyroid eye disease (TED), yet the impact of surgical approach and preoperative factors on outcomes remains uncertain.ObjectiveTo compare proptosis reduction following different orbital decompression techniques, identify additional risk factors that may play a role in surgical orbital decompression outcomes, and develop clinical decision-making recommendations based on these results.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on TED patients who underwent endoscopic medial wall, orbital floor, and/or open lateral wall decompression. We evaluated the influence of preoperative comorbidities, anatomic and laboratory values, and surgical approach on postdecompression Hertel exophthalmometry outcomes.ResultsAnalysis encompassed 130 orbits from 80 patients, 83% female, 48 with preoperative diplopia, and mean age of 54.4 years. Preoperative Hertel measurement was predictive of extent of proptosis reduction (<i>P</i> < .0001), indicating that higher initial Hertel measurement predicts greater absolute reduction following surgical intervention. Surgical technique correlated with outcome on univariate analysis (<i>P</i> = .04), but not multivariate (<i>P</i> = .13) analyses. When categorized into preoperative Hertel ranges, combined endoscopic medial and open lateral wall decompression resulted in mean proptosis reduction of 3.13 mm for range 20.01 to 24 mm and 3.85 mm for range 24.01 to 28 mm. Three-wall decompression resulted in mean proptosis reduction of 2.49 mm for and 3.84 mm for these ranges, respectively. Variables such as smoking, body mass index, orbital wall height, and TRAb level, did not affect outcomes. Nine patients had new onset diplopia.ConclusionsPreoperative Hertel exophthalmometry is the strongest predictor of proptosis reduction following orbital decompression in TED. Surgical technique appears to be less impactful on outcome than expected. Surgical decision making should be individualized based on patient goals; these findings can be used to achieve proptosis reduction and limit the risk of new onset diplopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":" ","pages":"284-292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orbital Decompression for Thyroid Eye Disease: Outcomes by Preoperative Severity and Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Lazaro R Peraza, Forrest W Fearington, Gabriel A Hernandez-Herrerra, Andrew S Awadallah, Lilly H Wagner, Andrea A Tooley, Elizabeth A Bradley, Marius N Stan, Janalee K Stokken\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19458924251330947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundOrbital decompression is an essential tool for reducing proptosis in thyroid eye disease (TED), yet the impact of surgical approach and preoperative factors on outcomes remains uncertain.ObjectiveTo compare proptosis reduction following different orbital decompression techniques, identify additional risk factors that may play a role in surgical orbital decompression outcomes, and develop clinical decision-making recommendations based on these results.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on TED patients who underwent endoscopic medial wall, orbital floor, and/or open lateral wall decompression. We evaluated the influence of preoperative comorbidities, anatomic and laboratory values, and surgical approach on postdecompression Hertel exophthalmometry outcomes.ResultsAnalysis encompassed 130 orbits from 80 patients, 83% female, 48 with preoperative diplopia, and mean age of 54.4 years. Preoperative Hertel measurement was predictive of extent of proptosis reduction (<i>P</i> < .0001), indicating that higher initial Hertel measurement predicts greater absolute reduction following surgical intervention. Surgical technique correlated with outcome on univariate analysis (<i>P</i> = .04), but not multivariate (<i>P</i> = .13) analyses. When categorized into preoperative Hertel ranges, combined endoscopic medial and open lateral wall decompression resulted in mean proptosis reduction of 3.13 mm for range 20.01 to 24 mm and 3.85 mm for range 24.01 to 28 mm. Three-wall decompression resulted in mean proptosis reduction of 2.49 mm for and 3.84 mm for these ranges, respectively. Variables such as smoking, body mass index, orbital wall height, and TRAb level, did not affect outcomes. Nine patients had new onset diplopia.ConclusionsPreoperative Hertel exophthalmometry is the strongest predictor of proptosis reduction following orbital decompression in TED. Surgical technique appears to be less impactful on outcome than expected. Surgical decision making should be individualized based on patient goals; these findings can be used to achieve proptosis reduction and limit the risk of new onset diplopia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"284-292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251330947\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251330947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:眶内减压术是减少甲状腺眼病(TED)患者眼球突出的重要手段,但手术入路和术前因素对预后的影响尚不确定。目的比较不同眼窝减压技术后的预后,确定可能影响手术眼窝减压结果的其他危险因素,并根据这些结果制定临床决策建议。方法回顾性分析行内窥镜内侧壁、眶底和/或开放侧壁减压术的TED患者。我们评估了术前合并症、解剖和实验室价值以及手术入路对减压后Hertel突眼测量结果的影响。结果80例患者130个眼窝,女性83%,术前复视48例,平均年龄54.4岁。术前Hertel测量可预测预后降低程度(P = 0.04),但在多变量分析中不能预测预后(P = 0.13)。在术前Hertel范围内,内窥镜内侧壁和开放侧壁联合减压导致20.01 - 24 mm范围内平均突出减少3.13 mm, 24.01 - 28 mm范围内平均突出减少3.85 mm。三壁减压导致这两个范围的平均突出分别减少2.49 mm和3.84 mm。吸烟、体重指数、眶壁高度和TRAb水平等变量对结果没有影响。新发复视9例。结论术前Hertel突眼测量是预测TED眶减压术后眼球突出降低的最有力指标。手术技术对预后的影响似乎比预期的要小。手术决策应根据患者的目标进行个体化;这些发现可用于降低复视和限制新发复视的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Orbital Decompression for Thyroid Eye Disease: Outcomes by Preoperative Severity and Technique.

BackgroundOrbital decompression is an essential tool for reducing proptosis in thyroid eye disease (TED), yet the impact of surgical approach and preoperative factors on outcomes remains uncertain.ObjectiveTo compare proptosis reduction following different orbital decompression techniques, identify additional risk factors that may play a role in surgical orbital decompression outcomes, and develop clinical decision-making recommendations based on these results.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on TED patients who underwent endoscopic medial wall, orbital floor, and/or open lateral wall decompression. We evaluated the influence of preoperative comorbidities, anatomic and laboratory values, and surgical approach on postdecompression Hertel exophthalmometry outcomes.ResultsAnalysis encompassed 130 orbits from 80 patients, 83% female, 48 with preoperative diplopia, and mean age of 54.4 years. Preoperative Hertel measurement was predictive of extent of proptosis reduction (P < .0001), indicating that higher initial Hertel measurement predicts greater absolute reduction following surgical intervention. Surgical technique correlated with outcome on univariate analysis (P = .04), but not multivariate (P = .13) analyses. When categorized into preoperative Hertel ranges, combined endoscopic medial and open lateral wall decompression resulted in mean proptosis reduction of 3.13 mm for range 20.01 to 24 mm and 3.85 mm for range 24.01 to 28 mm. Three-wall decompression resulted in mean proptosis reduction of 2.49 mm for and 3.84 mm for these ranges, respectively. Variables such as smoking, body mass index, orbital wall height, and TRAb level, did not affect outcomes. Nine patients had new onset diplopia.ConclusionsPreoperative Hertel exophthalmometry is the strongest predictor of proptosis reduction following orbital decompression in TED. Surgical technique appears to be less impactful on outcome than expected. Surgical decision making should be individualized based on patient goals; these findings can be used to achieve proptosis reduction and limit the risk of new onset diplopia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信