遗传性视网膜疾病途径在英国:患者的观点和人工智能的潜力。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Wendy Wong, Dayyanah Sumodhee, Tiyi Morris, Bhavna Tailor, Catherine Hollyhead, William A Woof, Stephen Archer, Carl Veal, Loy Lobo, Saoud Al-Khuzaei, Malena Daich Varela, Thales A C de Guimaraes, Manuel Gomes, Mital Shah, Mariya Moosajee, Susan M Downes, Savita Madhusudhan, Omar A Mahroo, Andrew R Webster, Michel Michaelides, Nikolas Pontikos
{"title":"遗传性视网膜疾病途径在英国:患者的观点和人工智能的潜力。","authors":"Wendy Wong, Dayyanah Sumodhee, Tiyi Morris, Bhavna Tailor, Catherine Hollyhead, William A Woof, Stephen Archer, Carl Veal, Loy Lobo, Saoud Al-Khuzaei, Malena Daich Varela, Thales A C de Guimaraes, Manuel Gomes, Mital Shah, Mariya Moosajee, Susan M Downes, Savita Madhusudhan, Omar A Mahroo, Andrew R Webster, Michel Michaelides, Nikolas Pontikos","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2024-327074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are the leading cause of blindness in young people in the UK. Despite significant improvements in genomics medicine, the diagnosis of these conditions remains challenging, and around 40% do not receive a definite genetic diagnosis after extensive genetic testing. This survey aims to investigate the experience of individuals affected by IRDs, their relatives, friends and caregivers, focusing on their care and diagnostic journey. Additionally, it explores the potential acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, such as Eye2Gene, that predict causative genes from retinal images of patients with IRDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey included Likert scale and open-ended questions and was distributed electronically using the Qualtrics platform between April and August 2024. The survey included questions on respondent demographics; their journey to receive specialist care and genetic testing; their information needs and their attitude towards AI-augmented diagnosis. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to interpret the survey responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey had 247 responses, of which 242 were analysed after removing four duplicates and one without consent; 80.2% were patients and the remainder were relatives, friends or caregivers. There was substantial variability in patient diagnostic journeys in terms of waiting times to see a specialist (IQR, 1-4 years), commute required (IQR, 10-74 miles) and number of visits to reach a diagnosis (IQR, 2-4). A substantial proportion of patients (35.8%) had a change in diagnosis. The majority of respondents (>90%) were overwhelmingly in favour of the integration of AI into the IRD pathway to accelerate genetic diagnosis and improve care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey identifies several key gaps and disparities in the IRD care pathway which may potentially be bridged with AI. The survey also reveals a favourable attitude towards incorporating AI into diagnostic testing of IRDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inherited retinal disease pathway in the UK: a patient perspective and the potential of AI.\",\"authors\":\"Wendy Wong, Dayyanah Sumodhee, Tiyi Morris, Bhavna Tailor, Catherine Hollyhead, William A Woof, Stephen Archer, Carl Veal, Loy Lobo, Saoud Al-Khuzaei, Malena Daich Varela, Thales A C de Guimaraes, Manuel Gomes, Mital Shah, Mariya Moosajee, Susan M Downes, Savita Madhusudhan, Omar A Mahroo, Andrew R Webster, Michel Michaelides, Nikolas Pontikos\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bjo-2024-327074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are the leading cause of blindness in young people in the UK. Despite significant improvements in genomics medicine, the diagnosis of these conditions remains challenging, and around 40% do not receive a definite genetic diagnosis after extensive genetic testing. This survey aims to investigate the experience of individuals affected by IRDs, their relatives, friends and caregivers, focusing on their care and diagnostic journey. Additionally, it explores the potential acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, such as Eye2Gene, that predict causative genes from retinal images of patients with IRDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey included Likert scale and open-ended questions and was distributed electronically using the Qualtrics platform between April and August 2024. The survey included questions on respondent demographics; their journey to receive specialist care and genetic testing; their information needs and their attitude towards AI-augmented diagnosis. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to interpret the survey responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey had 247 responses, of which 242 were analysed after removing four duplicates and one without consent; 80.2% were patients and the remainder were relatives, friends or caregivers. There was substantial variability in patient diagnostic journeys in terms of waiting times to see a specialist (IQR, 1-4 years), commute required (IQR, 10-74 miles) and number of visits to reach a diagnosis (IQR, 2-4). A substantial proportion of patients (35.8%) had a change in diagnosis. The majority of respondents (>90%) were overwhelmingly in favour of the integration of AI into the IRD pathway to accelerate genetic diagnosis and improve care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey identifies several key gaps and disparities in the IRD care pathway which may potentially be bridged with AI. The survey also reveals a favourable attitude towards incorporating AI into diagnostic testing of IRDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-327074\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-327074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:遗传性视网膜疾病(IRDs)是英国年轻人失明的主要原因。尽管基因组学医学取得了重大进展,但这些疾病的诊断仍然具有挑战性,大约40%的人在经过广泛的基因检测后没有得到明确的基因诊断。这项调查的目的是调查受残疾人士影响的个人、他们的亲戚、朋友和照顾者的经历,重点是他们的护理和诊断过程。此外,它还探讨了人工智能(AI)技术(如Eye2Gene)的潜在可接受性,该技术可以从ird患者的视网膜图像中预测致病基因。方法:横断面调查采用李克特量表和开放式问题,于2024年4月至8月通过qualics平台进行电子分发。调查内容包括受访者的人口统计问题;他们接受专科治疗和基因检测的旅程;他们的信息需求和对人工智能增强诊断的态度。使用描述性统计和内容分析来解释调查结果。结果:调查共收到247份回复,其中242份在删除4份重复和1份未经同意后进行分析;80.2%是患者,其余是亲属、朋友或照顾者。在等待看专家的时间(IQR, 1-4年)、通勤所需时间(IQR, 10-74英里)和就诊次数(IQR, 2-4)方面,患者的诊断旅程存在很大差异。相当比例的患者(35.8%)有诊断改变。大多数受访者(60%至90%)压倒性地支持将人工智能整合到IRD途径中,以加速遗传诊断和改善护理。结论:本调查确定了IRD护理途径中的几个关键缺口和差距,这些缺口和差距可能会被人工智能所弥合。调查还显示,人们对将人工智能纳入内源性疾病的诊断测试持积极态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inherited retinal disease pathway in the UK: a patient perspective and the potential of AI.

Background: Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are the leading cause of blindness in young people in the UK. Despite significant improvements in genomics medicine, the diagnosis of these conditions remains challenging, and around 40% do not receive a definite genetic diagnosis after extensive genetic testing. This survey aims to investigate the experience of individuals affected by IRDs, their relatives, friends and caregivers, focusing on their care and diagnostic journey. Additionally, it explores the potential acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, such as Eye2Gene, that predict causative genes from retinal images of patients with IRDs.

Methods: This cross-sectional survey included Likert scale and open-ended questions and was distributed electronically using the Qualtrics platform between April and August 2024. The survey included questions on respondent demographics; their journey to receive specialist care and genetic testing; their information needs and their attitude towards AI-augmented diagnosis. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to interpret the survey responses.

Results: The survey had 247 responses, of which 242 were analysed after removing four duplicates and one without consent; 80.2% were patients and the remainder were relatives, friends or caregivers. There was substantial variability in patient diagnostic journeys in terms of waiting times to see a specialist (IQR, 1-4 years), commute required (IQR, 10-74 miles) and number of visits to reach a diagnosis (IQR, 2-4). A substantial proportion of patients (35.8%) had a change in diagnosis. The majority of respondents (>90%) were overwhelmingly in favour of the integration of AI into the IRD pathway to accelerate genetic diagnosis and improve care.

Conclusion: This survey identifies several key gaps and disparities in the IRD care pathway which may potentially be bridged with AI. The survey also reveals a favourable attitude towards incorporating AI into diagnostic testing of IRDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信