横腹平面阻滞和飞溅阻滞在犬乳腺切除术后疼痛控制中的应用比较——一项盲法随机前瞻性临床研究。

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animals Pub Date : 2025-05-02 DOI:10.3390/ani15091323
Daniele Corona, Simone K Ringer, Stefanie Keller, Iris M Reichler, Regula Bettschart-Wolfensberger, Annette P N Kutter
{"title":"横腹平面阻滞和飞溅阻滞在犬乳腺切除术后疼痛控制中的应用比较——一项盲法随机前瞻性临床研究。","authors":"Daniele Corona, Simone K Ringer, Stefanie Keller, Iris M Reichler, Regula Bettschart-Wolfensberger, Annette P N Kutter","doi":"10.3390/ani15091323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare the use of postoperative analgesia for mastectomy, 44 dogs were randomly allocated to either the Splash treatment group (group A) or the Transverse Abdominis Plane block treatment group (TAP, group B). Following intramuscular (IM) premedication with pethidine (4 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) and acepromazine (0.01 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>), anesthesia was induced with intravenous (IV) propofol and maintained with isoflurane by an anesthetist (DC) who was unaware of the treatment. In group A, ropivacaine 0.5% (2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) was administered prior to surgical wound closure. In group B, ropivacaine 0.5% (0.8-1 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> per point) was administered by ultrasound-guided TAP block with two injection points per treated body side. At the end of the surgery, all dogs received pethidine (4 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> IM), meloxicam (0.2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> IV), and acepromazine (0.005 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> IV). The animals' pain was assessed by the anesthetist, who remained unaware of the treatment type used, via the Short Form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale. When the pain scores were ≥6, methadone (0.2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> IV) and gabapentin (10 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> per oral) were started. When the pain score remained ≥ 6, ketamine (1 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> subcutaneously) was administered. The dogs in the TAP block group had lower postoperative pain scores 3-12 h after anesthesia administration was terminated and required significantly less rescue analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12071095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Use of Transverse Abdominis Plane Block and Splash Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Dogs Undergoing Mastectomy-A Blinded Randomized Prospective Clinical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Corona, Simone K Ringer, Stefanie Keller, Iris M Reichler, Regula Bettschart-Wolfensberger, Annette P N Kutter\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ani15091323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To compare the use of postoperative analgesia for mastectomy, 44 dogs were randomly allocated to either the Splash treatment group (group A) or the Transverse Abdominis Plane block treatment group (TAP, group B). Following intramuscular (IM) premedication with pethidine (4 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) and acepromazine (0.01 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>), anesthesia was induced with intravenous (IV) propofol and maintained with isoflurane by an anesthetist (DC) who was unaware of the treatment. In group A, ropivacaine 0.5% (2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) was administered prior to surgical wound closure. In group B, ropivacaine 0.5% (0.8-1 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> per point) was administered by ultrasound-guided TAP block with two injection points per treated body side. At the end of the surgery, all dogs received pethidine (4 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> IM), meloxicam (0.2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> IV), and acepromazine (0.005 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> IV). The animals' pain was assessed by the anesthetist, who remained unaware of the treatment type used, via the Short Form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale. When the pain scores were ≥6, methadone (0.2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> IV) and gabapentin (10 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> per oral) were started. When the pain score remained ≥ 6, ketamine (1 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> subcutaneously) was administered. The dogs in the TAP block group had lower postoperative pain scores 3-12 h after anesthesia administration was terminated and required significantly less rescue analgesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animals\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12071095/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15091323\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15091323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了比较乳房切除术后镇痛的使用情况,将44只狗随机分为Splash治疗组(A组)和横腹面阻滞治疗组(TAP, B组)。在肌内(IM)预用药哌啶(4mg kg-1)和乙酰丙嗪(0.01 mg kg-1)后,由一名不知情的麻醉师(DC)静脉注射丙泊酚诱导麻醉,并用异氟醚维持麻醉。A组手术缝合前给予罗哌卡因0.5% (2mg kg-1)。B组采用超声引导TAP阻滞给予0.5%罗哌卡因(0.8 ~ 1 mg kg-1 /点),每治疗体侧2个注射点。手术结束时,所有犬均给予哌啶(4 mg kg-1 IM)、美洛昔康(0.2 mg kg-1 IV)和乙酰丙嗪(0.005 mg kg-1 IV)。动物的疼痛由麻醉师评估,麻醉师不知道使用的治疗类型,通过格拉斯哥复合疼痛量表的简短形式。当疼痛评分≥6分时,开始使用美沙酮(0.2 mg kg-1静脉注射)和加巴喷丁(10 mg kg-1口服)。当疼痛评分≥6分时,给予氯胺酮(1mg kg-1)皮下注射。TAP阻断组犬在终止麻醉后3-12 h的术后疼痛评分较低,需要的抢救性镇痛明显减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Use of Transverse Abdominis Plane Block and Splash Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Dogs Undergoing Mastectomy-A Blinded Randomized Prospective Clinical Study.

To compare the use of postoperative analgesia for mastectomy, 44 dogs were randomly allocated to either the Splash treatment group (group A) or the Transverse Abdominis Plane block treatment group (TAP, group B). Following intramuscular (IM) premedication with pethidine (4 mg kg-1) and acepromazine (0.01 mg kg-1), anesthesia was induced with intravenous (IV) propofol and maintained with isoflurane by an anesthetist (DC) who was unaware of the treatment. In group A, ropivacaine 0.5% (2 mg kg-1) was administered prior to surgical wound closure. In group B, ropivacaine 0.5% (0.8-1 mg kg-1 per point) was administered by ultrasound-guided TAP block with two injection points per treated body side. At the end of the surgery, all dogs received pethidine (4 mg kg-1 IM), meloxicam (0.2 mg kg-1 IV), and acepromazine (0.005 mg kg-1 IV). The animals' pain was assessed by the anesthetist, who remained unaware of the treatment type used, via the Short Form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale. When the pain scores were ≥6, methadone (0.2 mg kg-1 IV) and gabapentin (10 mg kg-1 per oral) were started. When the pain score remained ≥ 6, ketamine (1 mg kg-1 subcutaneously) was administered. The dogs in the TAP block group had lower postoperative pain scores 3-12 h after anesthesia administration was terminated and required significantly less rescue analgesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animals
Animals Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍: Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信