巴基斯坦感染预防和控制实践的交叉分析:基于感染预防和控制评估框架的全国调查。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Saima Asghar, Muhammad Atif, Imran Masood
{"title":"巴基斯坦感染预防和控制实践的交叉分析:基于感染预防和控制评估框架的全国调查。","authors":"Saima Asghar, Muhammad Atif, Imran Masood","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most health care-associated infections are preventable through the effective implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) program. The study aimed to evaluate the current IPC practices in health care facilities of Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a nationwide cross-sectional survey, in which data were obtained from key informants of the IPC team in recruited hospitals using the Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) questionnaire. Based on the IPCAF scoring algorithm, hospitals were categorized as Inadequate, Basic, Intermediate, or Advanced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median IPCAF score for all hospitals (N=42) was 387.8/800 (IQR: 219.8-518.8). The median IPCAF score for public and private hospitals was 353 (IQR: 155.3-468.5) and 583 (IQR: 431.3-598.8), respectively. A significant association was found between IPC levels and a hospital's level of care, bed capacity, key informant's qualification, IPC certification, and IPC training.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is a need to strengthen all IPC core components with a special focus on IPC education and training, health care-associated infection surveillance, monitoring/audit of IPC practices and feedback, and workload, staffing, and bed occupancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Private sector hospitals demonstrated better commitment to IPC measures by achieving an \"Intermediate\" level of IPC as compared with public sector hospitals having a \"Basic\" IPC level.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An intersectional analysis of infection prevention and control practices in Pakistan: A nationwide survey based on the Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework.\",\"authors\":\"Saima Asghar, Muhammad Atif, Imran Masood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.04.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most health care-associated infections are preventable through the effective implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) program. The study aimed to evaluate the current IPC practices in health care facilities of Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a nationwide cross-sectional survey, in which data were obtained from key informants of the IPC team in recruited hospitals using the Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) questionnaire. Based on the IPCAF scoring algorithm, hospitals were categorized as Inadequate, Basic, Intermediate, or Advanced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median IPCAF score for all hospitals (N=42) was 387.8/800 (IQR: 219.8-518.8). The median IPCAF score for public and private hospitals was 353 (IQR: 155.3-468.5) and 583 (IQR: 431.3-598.8), respectively. A significant association was found between IPC levels and a hospital's level of care, bed capacity, key informant's qualification, IPC certification, and IPC training.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is a need to strengthen all IPC core components with a special focus on IPC education and training, health care-associated infection surveillance, monitoring/audit of IPC practices and feedback, and workload, staffing, and bed occupancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Private sector hospitals demonstrated better commitment to IPC measures by achieving an \\\"Intermediate\\\" level of IPC as compared with public sector hospitals having a \\\"Basic\\\" IPC level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.04.006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.04.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通过有效实施感染预防和控制(IPC)计划,大多数卫生保健相关感染是可以预防的。该研究旨在评估巴基斯坦卫生保健机构目前的IPC做法。方法:采用全国性横断面调查方法,采用感染预防和控制评估框架(IPCAF)问卷,从所招募医院IPC团队的关键线人处获取数据。根据IPCAF评分算法,医院被分为不足、基本、中级和高级。结果:42家医院IPCAF评分中位数为387.8/800 (IQR: 219.8 ~ 518.8)。公立医院和私立医院的IPCAF得分中位数分别为353 (IQR: 155.3-468.5)和583 (IQR: 431.3-598.8)。发现IPC水平与医院的护理水平、床位容量、关键线人资格、IPC认证和IPC培训之间存在显著关联。讨论:需要加强所有IPC核心组成部分,特别关注IPC教育和培训、卫生保健相关感染监测、IPC实践和反馈的监测/审计以及工作量、人员配备和床位占用。结论:与达到“基本”水平的公立医院相比,私营医院实现了“中级”水平的IPC,表现出对IPC措施的更好承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An intersectional analysis of infection prevention and control practices in Pakistan: A nationwide survey based on the Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework.

Background: Most health care-associated infections are preventable through the effective implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) program. The study aimed to evaluate the current IPC practices in health care facilities of Pakistan.

Methods: This was a nationwide cross-sectional survey, in which data were obtained from key informants of the IPC team in recruited hospitals using the Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) questionnaire. Based on the IPCAF scoring algorithm, hospitals were categorized as Inadequate, Basic, Intermediate, or Advanced.

Results: The median IPCAF score for all hospitals (N=42) was 387.8/800 (IQR: 219.8-518.8). The median IPCAF score for public and private hospitals was 353 (IQR: 155.3-468.5) and 583 (IQR: 431.3-598.8), respectively. A significant association was found between IPC levels and a hospital's level of care, bed capacity, key informant's qualification, IPC certification, and IPC training.

Discussion: There is a need to strengthen all IPC core components with a special focus on IPC education and training, health care-associated infection surveillance, monitoring/audit of IPC practices and feedback, and workload, staffing, and bed occupancy.

Conclusions: Private sector hospitals demonstrated better commitment to IPC measures by achieving an "Intermediate" level of IPC as compared with public sector hospitals having a "Basic" IPC level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信