Lindsey N Guerin, Timothy J Scott, Jacqueline A Yap, Annelie Johansson, Fabio Puddu, Tom Charlesworth, Yilin Yang, Alan J Simmons, Ken S Lau, Rebecca A Ihrie, Emily Hodges
{"title":"时间上不一致的染色质可及性和DNA去甲基化定义了细胞命运规范过程中的短期和长期增强子调控。","authors":"Lindsey N Guerin, Timothy J Scott, Jacqueline A Yap, Annelie Johansson, Fabio Puddu, Tom Charlesworth, Yilin Yang, Alan J Simmons, Ken S Lau, Rebecca A Ihrie, Emily Hodges","doi":"10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chromatin and DNA modifications mediate the transcriptional activity of lineage-specifying enhancers, but recent work challenges the dogma that joint chromatin accessibility and DNA demethylation are prerequisites for transcription. To understand this paradox, we established a highly resolved timeline of their dynamics during neural progenitor cell differentiation. We discovered that, while complete demethylation appears delayed relative to shorter-lived chromatin changes for thousands of enhancers, DNA demethylation actually initiates with 5-hydroxymethylation before appreciable accessibility and transcription factor occupancy is observed. The extended timeline of DNA demethylation creates temporal discordance appearing as heterogeneity in enhancer regulatory states. Few regions ever gain methylation, and resulting enhancer hypomethylation persists long after chromatin activities have dissipated. We demonstrate that the temporal methylation status of CpGs (mC/hmC/C) predicts past, present, and future chromatin accessibility using machine learning models. Thus, chromatin and DNA methylation collaborate on different timescales to shape short- and long-term enhancer regulation during cell fate specification.</p>","PeriodicalId":9798,"journal":{"name":"Cell reports","volume":"44 5","pages":"115680"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporally discordant chromatin accessibility and DNA demethylation define short- and long-term enhancer regulation during cell fate specification.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsey N Guerin, Timothy J Scott, Jacqueline A Yap, Annelie Johansson, Fabio Puddu, Tom Charlesworth, Yilin Yang, Alan J Simmons, Ken S Lau, Rebecca A Ihrie, Emily Hodges\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chromatin and DNA modifications mediate the transcriptional activity of lineage-specifying enhancers, but recent work challenges the dogma that joint chromatin accessibility and DNA demethylation are prerequisites for transcription. To understand this paradox, we established a highly resolved timeline of their dynamics during neural progenitor cell differentiation. We discovered that, while complete demethylation appears delayed relative to shorter-lived chromatin changes for thousands of enhancers, DNA demethylation actually initiates with 5-hydroxymethylation before appreciable accessibility and transcription factor occupancy is observed. The extended timeline of DNA demethylation creates temporal discordance appearing as heterogeneity in enhancer regulatory states. Few regions ever gain methylation, and resulting enhancer hypomethylation persists long after chromatin activities have dissipated. We demonstrate that the temporal methylation status of CpGs (mC/hmC/C) predicts past, present, and future chromatin accessibility using machine learning models. Thus, chromatin and DNA methylation collaborate on different timescales to shape short- and long-term enhancer regulation during cell fate specification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell reports\",\"volume\":\"44 5\",\"pages\":\"115680\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115680\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115680","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Temporally discordant chromatin accessibility and DNA demethylation define short- and long-term enhancer regulation during cell fate specification.
Chromatin and DNA modifications mediate the transcriptional activity of lineage-specifying enhancers, but recent work challenges the dogma that joint chromatin accessibility and DNA demethylation are prerequisites for transcription. To understand this paradox, we established a highly resolved timeline of their dynamics during neural progenitor cell differentiation. We discovered that, while complete demethylation appears delayed relative to shorter-lived chromatin changes for thousands of enhancers, DNA demethylation actually initiates with 5-hydroxymethylation before appreciable accessibility and transcription factor occupancy is observed. The extended timeline of DNA demethylation creates temporal discordance appearing as heterogeneity in enhancer regulatory states. Few regions ever gain methylation, and resulting enhancer hypomethylation persists long after chromatin activities have dissipated. We demonstrate that the temporal methylation status of CpGs (mC/hmC/C) predicts past, present, and future chromatin accessibility using machine learning models. Thus, chromatin and DNA methylation collaborate on different timescales to shape short- and long-term enhancer regulation during cell fate specification.
期刊介绍:
Cell Reports publishes high-quality research across the life sciences and focuses on new biological insight as its primary criterion for publication. The journal offers three primary article types: Reports, which are shorter single-point articles, research articles, which are longer and provide deeper mechanistic insights, and resources, which highlight significant technical advances or major informational datasets that contribute to biological advances. Reviews covering recent literature in emerging and active fields are also accepted.
The Cell Reports Portfolio includes gold open-access journals that cover life, medical, and physical sciences, and its mission is to make cutting-edge research and methodologies available to a wide readership.
The journal's professional in-house editors work closely with authors, reviewers, and the scientific advisory board, which consists of current and future leaders in their respective fields. The advisory board guides the scope, content, and quality of the journal, but editorial decisions are independently made by the in-house scientific editors of Cell Reports.