用COSMIN方法验证波斯语版糖尿病自我保健活动量表(SDSCA)在妊娠期糖尿病孕妇中的应用

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Mahsa Maghalian, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Fatemeh Abbasalizadeh, Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, Solmaz Ghanbari-Homaie, Mojgan Mirghafourvand
{"title":"用COSMIN方法验证波斯语版糖尿病自我保健活动量表(SDSCA)在妊娠期糖尿病孕妇中的应用","authors":"Mahsa Maghalian, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Fatemeh Abbasalizadeh, Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, Solmaz Ghanbari-Homaie, Mojgan Mirghafourvand","doi":"10.1186/s12902-025-01931-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a condition with significant prenatal and postnatal implications. This study aimed to validate the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) measure in Iranian women with GDM, focusing on its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Persian version of the SDSCA was evaluated in 180 Iranian women with GDM. Following COSMIN guidelines, the instrument was translated into Persian, and its psychometric properties were assessed, including content validity, face validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, responsiveness, and interpretability. Floor and ceiling effects were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The validity assessments showed strong content validity, with a Content Validity Index (CVI) of 0.93 and a Content Validity Ratio (CVR) of 0.97. Face validity yielded an impact score of 4.38. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified three factors-diet, exercise, and blood sugar testing-accounting for 57.4% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the model's excellent fit (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, NFI = 0.98, RFI = 0.96). The reliability analysis showed a Cronbach's alpha of 0.78 and a McDonald's omega of 0.91, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.83-0.96). Ceiling effects were observed for blood sugar testing (26.7%), while floor effects were noted for exercise (6.7%) and blood sugar testing (6.1%). The Minimal Important Change (MIC) of 2.68 units exceeded the Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) of 1.11 units, indicating the tool's ability to detect clinically meaningful changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Persian version of the SDSCA demonstrates strong psychometric properties, including both reliability and validity, making it a suitable tool for assessing self-care behaviors in Iranian women with GDM. Its use in future research can enhance understanding of self-management in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12007123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Persian version of the summary of diabetes self-care activities scale (SDSCA) in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus using a COSMIN methodology.\",\"authors\":\"Mahsa Maghalian, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Fatemeh Abbasalizadeh, Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, Solmaz Ghanbari-Homaie, Mojgan Mirghafourvand\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12902-025-01931-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a condition with significant prenatal and postnatal implications. This study aimed to validate the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) measure in Iranian women with GDM, focusing on its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Persian version of the SDSCA was evaluated in 180 Iranian women with GDM. Following COSMIN guidelines, the instrument was translated into Persian, and its psychometric properties were assessed, including content validity, face validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, responsiveness, and interpretability. Floor and ceiling effects were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The validity assessments showed strong content validity, with a Content Validity Index (CVI) of 0.93 and a Content Validity Ratio (CVR) of 0.97. Face validity yielded an impact score of 4.38. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified three factors-diet, exercise, and blood sugar testing-accounting for 57.4% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the model's excellent fit (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, NFI = 0.98, RFI = 0.96). The reliability analysis showed a Cronbach's alpha of 0.78 and a McDonald's omega of 0.91, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.83-0.96). Ceiling effects were observed for blood sugar testing (26.7%), while floor effects were noted for exercise (6.7%) and blood sugar testing (6.1%). The Minimal Important Change (MIC) of 2.68 units exceeded the Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) of 1.11 units, indicating the tool's ability to detect clinically meaningful changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Persian version of the SDSCA demonstrates strong psychometric properties, including both reliability and validity, making it a suitable tool for assessing self-care behaviors in Iranian women with GDM. Its use in future research can enhance understanding of self-management in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Endocrine Disorders\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12007123/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Endocrine Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-025-01931-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-025-01931-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是一种具有显著产前和产后影响的疾病。本研究旨在验证伊朗GDM女性糖尿病自我护理活动摘要(SDSCA)测量,重点关注其心理测量特性。方法:对180名伊朗GDM患者进行波斯版SDSCA评估。根据COSMIN指南,将该工具翻译成波斯语,并评估其心理测量特性,包括内容效度、面部效度、结构效度、内部一致性、测试重测信度、测量误差、反应性和可解释性。还研究了地板和天花板效应。结果:效度评价结果显示内容效度强,内容效度指数(CVI)为0.93,内容效度比(CVR)为0.97。面部效度产生的影响得分为4.38。探索性因素分析(EFA)确定了三个因素——饮食、运动和血糖测试——占方差的57.4%。验证性因子分析(CFA)证实模型拟合良好(CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, NFI = 0.98, RFI = 0.96)。信度分析显示Cronbach's alpha为0.78,McDonald's omega为0.91,类内相关系数(ICC)为0.92 (95% CI: 0.83-0.96)。在血糖测试中观察到天花板效应(26.7%),而在运动(6.7%)和血糖测试中观察到地板效应(6.1%)。最小重要变化(MIC)为2.68个单位,超过了最小可检测变化(SDC)的1.11个单位,表明该工具能够检测到有临床意义的变化。结论:波斯语版本的SDSCA表现出强大的心理测量特性,包括信度和效度,使其成为评估伊朗GDM妇女自我保健行为的合适工具。在未来的研究中使用它可以增强对这一人群自我管理的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Persian version of the summary of diabetes self-care activities scale (SDSCA) in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus using a COSMIN methodology.

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a condition with significant prenatal and postnatal implications. This study aimed to validate the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) measure in Iranian women with GDM, focusing on its psychometric properties.

Methods: The Persian version of the SDSCA was evaluated in 180 Iranian women with GDM. Following COSMIN guidelines, the instrument was translated into Persian, and its psychometric properties were assessed, including content validity, face validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, responsiveness, and interpretability. Floor and ceiling effects were also examined.

Results: The validity assessments showed strong content validity, with a Content Validity Index (CVI) of 0.93 and a Content Validity Ratio (CVR) of 0.97. Face validity yielded an impact score of 4.38. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified three factors-diet, exercise, and blood sugar testing-accounting for 57.4% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the model's excellent fit (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, NFI = 0.98, RFI = 0.96). The reliability analysis showed a Cronbach's alpha of 0.78 and a McDonald's omega of 0.91, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.83-0.96). Ceiling effects were observed for blood sugar testing (26.7%), while floor effects were noted for exercise (6.7%) and blood sugar testing (6.1%). The Minimal Important Change (MIC) of 2.68 units exceeded the Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) of 1.11 units, indicating the tool's ability to detect clinically meaningful changes.

Conclusions: The Persian version of the SDSCA demonstrates strong psychometric properties, including both reliability and validity, making it a suitable tool for assessing self-care behaviors in Iranian women with GDM. Its use in future research can enhance understanding of self-management in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信