两种不同剂量鞘内吗啡用于电视胸腔镜术后镇痛的比较。

IF 1.1 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Volkan Okbaz, Mediha Turktan, Ersel Gulec, Zehra Hatıpoglu, Cansu Bahcecı, Ismail C Karacaoglu
{"title":"两种不同剂量鞘内吗啡用于电视胸腔镜术后镇痛的比较。","authors":"Volkan Okbaz, Mediha Turktan, Ersel Gulec, Zehra Hatıpoglu, Cansu Bahcecı, Ismail C Karacaoglu","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_258_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Postoperative pain is one of the most common problems after thoracic surgery. In this study, we aimed to investigate the analgesic effects of two different doses of intrathecal morphine (ITM) based on ideal body weight in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-six patients scheduled for elective lung resection were included in this study. Patients were allocated to receive 10 μg/kg (Group I) and 7 μg/kg (Group II) ITM according to the ideal body weight for postoperative analgesia. Intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic variables, postoperative morphine consumption, pain scores (at rest and effort), side effects, and additional analgesic requirements were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative pain scores did not differ in the first 12 h between the groups, but were significantly lower in Group I compared with Group II at 18 and 24 hours (<i>P</i> = 0.024 and <i>P</i> = 0.017 at rest, and <i>P</i> = 0.025 and <i>P</i> = 0.002 at effort, respectively). Postoperative morphine consumption was statistically significantly lower in Group I at all time periods (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The incidence of side effects was similar for both groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of 10 μg/kg ITM according to the ideal body weight provides more effective analgesia without increasing the side effects compared to 7 μg/kg ITM after VATS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"41 2","pages":"219-225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two different intrathecal morphine doses for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Volkan Okbaz, Mediha Turktan, Ersel Gulec, Zehra Hatıpoglu, Cansu Bahcecı, Ismail C Karacaoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joacp.joacp_258_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Postoperative pain is one of the most common problems after thoracic surgery. In this study, we aimed to investigate the analgesic effects of two different doses of intrathecal morphine (ITM) based on ideal body weight in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-six patients scheduled for elective lung resection were included in this study. Patients were allocated to receive 10 μg/kg (Group I) and 7 μg/kg (Group II) ITM according to the ideal body weight for postoperative analgesia. Intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic variables, postoperative morphine consumption, pain scores (at rest and effort), side effects, and additional analgesic requirements were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative pain scores did not differ in the first 12 h between the groups, but were significantly lower in Group I compared with Group II at 18 and 24 hours (<i>P</i> = 0.024 and <i>P</i> = 0.017 at rest, and <i>P</i> = 0.025 and <i>P</i> = 0.002 at effort, respectively). Postoperative morphine consumption was statistically significantly lower in Group I at all time periods (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The incidence of side effects was similar for both groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of 10 μg/kg ITM according to the ideal body weight provides more effective analgesia without increasing the side effects compared to 7 μg/kg ITM after VATS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"219-225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002694/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_258_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_258_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:术后疼痛是胸外科手术后最常见的问题之一。在这项研究中,我们的目的是研究两种不同剂量的鞘内吗啡(ITM)基于理想体重对接受电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)患者的镇痛效果。材料和方法:本研究纳入46例择期肺切除术患者。根据患者术后理想体重,分别给予10 μg/kg (I组)和7 μg/kg (II组)的ITM用于术后镇痛。记录术中和术后血流动力学变量、术后吗啡消耗、疼痛评分(休息和努力时)、副作用和额外的镇痛需求。结果:两组术后12 h疼痛评分无差异,但在18和24 h时,I组疼痛评分明显低于II组(静息时P = 0.024和P = 0.017,用力时P = 0.025和P = 0.002)。术后各组吗啡用量均明显低于对照组(P < 0.05)。两组不良反应发生率相似(P < 0.05)。结论:与VATS术后7 μg/kg ITM相比,根据理想体重使用10 μg/kg ITM可提供更有效的镇痛效果,且不增加副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of two different intrathecal morphine doses for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Comparison of two different intrathecal morphine doses for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Comparison of two different intrathecal morphine doses for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Background and aims: Postoperative pain is one of the most common problems after thoracic surgery. In this study, we aimed to investigate the analgesic effects of two different doses of intrathecal morphine (ITM) based on ideal body weight in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

Material and methods: Forty-six patients scheduled for elective lung resection were included in this study. Patients were allocated to receive 10 μg/kg (Group I) and 7 μg/kg (Group II) ITM according to the ideal body weight for postoperative analgesia. Intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic variables, postoperative morphine consumption, pain scores (at rest and effort), side effects, and additional analgesic requirements were recorded.

Results: Postoperative pain scores did not differ in the first 12 h between the groups, but were significantly lower in Group I compared with Group II at 18 and 24 hours (P = 0.024 and P = 0.017 at rest, and P = 0.025 and P = 0.002 at effort, respectively). Postoperative morphine consumption was statistically significantly lower in Group I at all time periods (P < 0.05). The incidence of side effects was similar for both groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: The use of 10 μg/kg ITM according to the ideal body weight provides more effective analgesia without increasing the side effects compared to 7 μg/kg ITM after VATS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信