神经束造影的科学价值:准确性vs实用性。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Francois Rheault, Helen Mayberg, Michel Thiebaut de Schotten, Alard Roebroeck, Stephanie J Forkel
{"title":"神经束造影的科学价值:准确性vs实用性。","authors":"Francois Rheault, Helen Mayberg, Michel Thiebaut de Schotten, Alard Roebroeck, Stephanie J Forkel","doi":"10.1007/s00429-025-02921-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tractography has emerged as a central tool for mapping the cerebral white matter architecture. However, its scientific value continues to be a subject of debate, given its inherent limitations in anatomical accuracy. This concise communication showcases key points of a debate held at the 2024 Tract-Anat Retreat, addressing the trade-offs between the accuracy and utility of tractography. While tractography remains constrained by limitations related to resolution, sensitivity, and validation, its usefulness and utility in areas such as surgical planning, disorder prediction, and the elucidation of brain development are emphasized. These perspectives highlight the necessity of context-specific interpretation, anatomically informed algorithms, and the continuous refinement of tractography workflows to achieve an optimal balance between accuracy and utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":9145,"journal":{"name":"Brain Structure & Function","volume":"230 4","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The scientific value of tractography: accuracy vs usefulness.\",\"authors\":\"Francois Rheault, Helen Mayberg, Michel Thiebaut de Schotten, Alard Roebroeck, Stephanie J Forkel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00429-025-02921-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tractography has emerged as a central tool for mapping the cerebral white matter architecture. However, its scientific value continues to be a subject of debate, given its inherent limitations in anatomical accuracy. This concise communication showcases key points of a debate held at the 2024 Tract-Anat Retreat, addressing the trade-offs between the accuracy and utility of tractography. While tractography remains constrained by limitations related to resolution, sensitivity, and validation, its usefulness and utility in areas such as surgical planning, disorder prediction, and the elucidation of brain development are emphasized. These perspectives highlight the necessity of context-specific interpretation, anatomically informed algorithms, and the continuous refinement of tractography workflows to achieve an optimal balance between accuracy and utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Structure & Function\",\"volume\":\"230 4\",\"pages\":\"59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Structure & Function\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-025-02921-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Structure & Function","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-025-02921-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经束造影已经成为绘制大脑白质结构的核心工具。然而,它的科学价值仍然是一个争论的主题,鉴于其固有的限制在解剖精度。这篇简短的文章展示了在2024年Tract-Anat会议上举行的一场辩论的关键点,讨论了牵引造影的准确性和实用性之间的权衡。虽然神经束造影仍然受到分辨率、灵敏度和有效性的限制,但它在手术计划、疾病预测和大脑发育阐明等领域的实用性和实用性被强调。这些观点强调了上下文特定解释的必要性,解剖信息算法,以及持续改进导管造影工作流程,以实现准确性和实用性之间的最佳平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The scientific value of tractography: accuracy vs usefulness.

Tractography has emerged as a central tool for mapping the cerebral white matter architecture. However, its scientific value continues to be a subject of debate, given its inherent limitations in anatomical accuracy. This concise communication showcases key points of a debate held at the 2024 Tract-Anat Retreat, addressing the trade-offs between the accuracy and utility of tractography. While tractography remains constrained by limitations related to resolution, sensitivity, and validation, its usefulness and utility in areas such as surgical planning, disorder prediction, and the elucidation of brain development are emphasized. These perspectives highlight the necessity of context-specific interpretation, anatomically informed algorithms, and the continuous refinement of tractography workflows to achieve an optimal balance between accuracy and utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Structure & Function
Brain Structure & Function 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: Brain Structure & Function publishes research that provides insight into brain structure−function relationships. Studies published here integrate data spanning from molecular, cellular, developmental, and systems architecture to the neuroanatomy of behavior and cognitive functions. Manuscripts with focus on the spinal cord or the peripheral nervous system are not accepted for publication. Manuscripts with focus on diseases, animal models of diseases, or disease-related mechanisms are only considered for publication, if the findings provide novel insight into the organization and mechanisms of normal brain structure and function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信