不活动是孤立的:从久坐时间干预辅助生活的见解。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Irmina Klicnik, Brianna Leadbetter, Milena Zdjelar, Danielle R Bouchard, Jennifer L Copeland, Shilpa Dogra
{"title":"不活动是孤立的:从久坐时间干预辅助生活的见解。","authors":"Irmina Klicnik, Brianna Leadbetter, Milena Zdjelar, Danielle R Bouchard, Jennifer L Copeland, Shilpa Dogra","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05921-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As Canada's aging population continues to grow, a larger number of older adults will be residing in assisted living (residences with some on-site care and services). Research is needed to understand how to support active aging - defined as a combination of movement and social behaviours-in this unique living environment. In this study, we explored insights generated about active aging from older residents of assisted living who participated in an intervention designed to encourage standing breaks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multi-method exploratory study. Residents of three assisted living facilities participated in a 12-week intervention called Stand When You Can. The Keele Assessment of Participation (KAP) was used to assess perceived levels of participation in various domains of assisted living at pre- and post-intervention. Focus group sessions were conducted to explore insights on active aging. Transcripts were thematically analyzed to generate themes and sub-themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 residents (84.4 ± 6.8 years, 72% female), participated in the focus groups. KAP scores at pre-intervention were indicative of a high level of social participation within the residences. Five primary themes emerged from the focus group sessions: 1) intervention effectiveness, 2) physical and social engagement go hand in hand, 3) the congregate living environment can influence movement behaviour, 4) congregate living supports interpersonal relationships, and 5) personal preferences for solitary activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The natural communal setting of assisted living, along with supportive staff, presents a valuable opportunity to promote active aging, which is a complex interplay of social and movement behaviour. Our preliminary findings suggest that in addition to supporting individual behaviour change, a comprehensive approach that addresses the environment, social engagement, and staff engagement is needed in this setting. Future interventions should consider addressing each of these components to facilitate successful behaviour change related to active aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"281"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inactivity is isolation: insights from a sedentary time intervention in assisted living.\",\"authors\":\"Irmina Klicnik, Brianna Leadbetter, Milena Zdjelar, Danielle R Bouchard, Jennifer L Copeland, Shilpa Dogra\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-025-05921-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As Canada's aging population continues to grow, a larger number of older adults will be residing in assisted living (residences with some on-site care and services). Research is needed to understand how to support active aging - defined as a combination of movement and social behaviours-in this unique living environment. In this study, we explored insights generated about active aging from older residents of assisted living who participated in an intervention designed to encourage standing breaks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multi-method exploratory study. Residents of three assisted living facilities participated in a 12-week intervention called Stand When You Can. The Keele Assessment of Participation (KAP) was used to assess perceived levels of participation in various domains of assisted living at pre- and post-intervention. Focus group sessions were conducted to explore insights on active aging. Transcripts were thematically analyzed to generate themes and sub-themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 residents (84.4 ± 6.8 years, 72% female), participated in the focus groups. KAP scores at pre-intervention were indicative of a high level of social participation within the residences. Five primary themes emerged from the focus group sessions: 1) intervention effectiveness, 2) physical and social engagement go hand in hand, 3) the congregate living environment can influence movement behaviour, 4) congregate living supports interpersonal relationships, and 5) personal preferences for solitary activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The natural communal setting of assisted living, along with supportive staff, presents a valuable opportunity to promote active aging, which is a complex interplay of social and movement behaviour. Our preliminary findings suggest that in addition to supporting individual behaviour change, a comprehensive approach that addresses the environment, social engagement, and staff engagement is needed in this setting. Future interventions should consider addressing each of these components to facilitate successful behaviour change related to active aging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032736/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05921-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05921-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着加拿大老龄化人口的持续增长,越来越多的老年人将居住在辅助生活中(有一些现场护理和服务的住所)。需要进行研究来了解如何在这种独特的生活环境中支持积极老龄化-定义为运动和社会行为的结合。在这项研究中,我们探索了从辅助生活的老年居民中产生的关于积极老龄化的见解,他们参与了旨在鼓励站立休息的干预。方法:采用多方法探索性研究。三家辅助生活机构的居民参加了一项为期12周的干预活动,名为“能站就站”。基尔参与评估(Keele Assessment of Participation, KAP)用于评估干预前和干预后辅助生活各个领域的感知参与水平。进行了焦点小组会议,以探讨积极衰老的见解。对转录本进行主题分析,生成主题和子主题。结果:共有18名居民(84.4±6.8岁,其中72%为女性)参加了焦点小组。干预前的KAP分数表明了住宅内高水平的社会参与。焦点小组会议产生了五个主要主题:1)干预有效性;2)身体和社会参与齐头并进;3)聚集生活环境可以影响运动行为;4)聚集生活支持人际关系;5)个人对单独活动的偏好。结论:辅助生活的自然公共环境,以及支持性工作人员,为促进积极老龄化提供了宝贵的机会,积极老龄化是社会和运动行为的复杂相互作用。我们的初步研究结果表明,除了支持个人行为改变外,在这种情况下还需要一种解决环境、社会参与和员工参与的综合方法。未来的干预措施应考虑解决这些组成部分,以促进与积极老龄化相关的成功行为改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inactivity is isolation: insights from a sedentary time intervention in assisted living.

Background: As Canada's aging population continues to grow, a larger number of older adults will be residing in assisted living (residences with some on-site care and services). Research is needed to understand how to support active aging - defined as a combination of movement and social behaviours-in this unique living environment. In this study, we explored insights generated about active aging from older residents of assisted living who participated in an intervention designed to encourage standing breaks.

Methods: This was a multi-method exploratory study. Residents of three assisted living facilities participated in a 12-week intervention called Stand When You Can. The Keele Assessment of Participation (KAP) was used to assess perceived levels of participation in various domains of assisted living at pre- and post-intervention. Focus group sessions were conducted to explore insights on active aging. Transcripts were thematically analyzed to generate themes and sub-themes.

Results: A total of 18 residents (84.4 ± 6.8 years, 72% female), participated in the focus groups. KAP scores at pre-intervention were indicative of a high level of social participation within the residences. Five primary themes emerged from the focus group sessions: 1) intervention effectiveness, 2) physical and social engagement go hand in hand, 3) the congregate living environment can influence movement behaviour, 4) congregate living supports interpersonal relationships, and 5) personal preferences for solitary activity.

Conclusions: The natural communal setting of assisted living, along with supportive staff, presents a valuable opportunity to promote active aging, which is a complex interplay of social and movement behaviour. Our preliminary findings suggest that in addition to supporting individual behaviour change, a comprehensive approach that addresses the environment, social engagement, and staff engagement is needed in this setting. Future interventions should consider addressing each of these components to facilitate successful behaviour change related to active aging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信