同步结直肠肝转移患者分期切除与同步切除后肝脏手术的预后。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb Pub Date : 2025-04-29 DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2025.04.014
Zayed Rashid, Abdullah Altaf, Mujtaba Khalil, Giovanni Catalano, Shahzaib Zindani, Andrea Ruzzenente, Irinel Popescu, Minoru Kitago, George A Poultsides, Kazunari Sasaki, Nazim Bhimani, Tom Hugh, Mathew Weiss, Luca Aldrighetti, Federico Aucejo, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik
{"title":"同步结直肠肝转移患者分期切除与同步切除后肝脏手术的预后。","authors":"Zayed Rashid, Abdullah Altaf, Mujtaba Khalil, Giovanni Catalano, Shahzaib Zindani, Andrea Ruzzenente, Irinel Popescu, Minoru Kitago, George A Poultsides, Kazunari Sasaki, Nazim Bhimani, Tom Hugh, Mathew Weiss, Luca Aldrighetti, Federico Aucejo, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to define the likelihood of textbook outcome in liver surgery (TOLS) among patients undergoing simultaneous versus staged resection for sCRLM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with sCRLM who underwent curative-intent resection between 2000-2022 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. TOLS was defined by the absence of intraoperative grade ≥2 events, R1 resection margin, post-hepatectomy liver failure, bile leakage, major postoperative complications, in-hospital/90-day mortality, and 90-day readmission. Multivariable regression was utilized to study associations between surgical approach and TOLS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 897 patients with median age of 62 (IQR 55-69) years, 376 (41.9 %) patients underwent synchronous resection whereas 521 (58.1 %) patients had staged resection of sCRLM. 62.8 % of patients had TOLS following sCRLM resection and patients who underwent staged resection were more likely to have TOLS (staged: 65.8 % vs. simultaneous: 58.5 %, p = 0.025). Staged resection was associated with 37 % higher odds of TOLS (OR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.04-1.80) than simultaneous resection. Incidence of TOLS decreased with extensive resection (low-risk colectomy and minor hepatectomy: 69.6 % vs. high-risk colectomy and major hepatectomy: 2.8 %; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>62.8 % of patients had TOLS following sCRLM resection. Staged versus simultaneous resection was associated with 37 % higher odds of TOLS. Extent of resection should be considered when determining the optimal operative approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Textbook outcome in liver surgery after staged versus simultaneous resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.\",\"authors\":\"Zayed Rashid, Abdullah Altaf, Mujtaba Khalil, Giovanni Catalano, Shahzaib Zindani, Andrea Ruzzenente, Irinel Popescu, Minoru Kitago, George A Poultsides, Kazunari Sasaki, Nazim Bhimani, Tom Hugh, Mathew Weiss, Luca Aldrighetti, Federico Aucejo, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.04.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to define the likelihood of textbook outcome in liver surgery (TOLS) among patients undergoing simultaneous versus staged resection for sCRLM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with sCRLM who underwent curative-intent resection between 2000-2022 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. TOLS was defined by the absence of intraoperative grade ≥2 events, R1 resection margin, post-hepatectomy liver failure, bile leakage, major postoperative complications, in-hospital/90-day mortality, and 90-day readmission. Multivariable regression was utilized to study associations between surgical approach and TOLS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 897 patients with median age of 62 (IQR 55-69) years, 376 (41.9 %) patients underwent synchronous resection whereas 521 (58.1 %) patients had staged resection of sCRLM. 62.8 % of patients had TOLS following sCRLM resection and patients who underwent staged resection were more likely to have TOLS (staged: 65.8 % vs. simultaneous: 58.5 %, p = 0.025). Staged resection was associated with 37 % higher odds of TOLS (OR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.04-1.80) than simultaneous resection. Incidence of TOLS decreased with extensive resection (low-risk colectomy and minor hepatectomy: 69.6 % vs. high-risk colectomy and major hepatectomy: 2.8 %; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>62.8 % of patients had TOLS following sCRLM resection. Staged versus simultaneous resection was associated with 37 % higher odds of TOLS. Extent of resection should be considered when determining the optimal operative approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hpb\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hpb\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.04.014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hpb","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.04.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们试图确定肝手术(TOLS)中同时切除与分期切除的肝细胞肝癌患者预后的可能性。方法:从国际多机构数据库中确定2000-2022年期间接受治愈性切除的sCRLM患者。TOLS的定义是术中无≥2级事件、R1切除边缘、肝切除术后肝功能衰竭、胆漏、术后主要并发症、住院/90天死亡率和90天再入院。采用多变量回归研究手术入路与TOLS之间的关系。结果:在897例中位年龄为62岁(IQR 55-69)的患者中,376例(41.9%)患者行同步切除,521例(58.1%)患者行分期切除。62.8%的患者在sCRLM切除术后发生了TOLS,而分期切除术的患者更有可能发生TOLS(分期:65.8% vs.同时:58.5%,p = 0.025)。与同期切除相比,分期切除的TOLS发生率高37% (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.04-1.80)。广泛切除术降低了TOLS的发生率(低危结肠切除术和小肝切除术:69.6%,高危结肠切除术和大肝切除术:2.8%;P < 0.001)。结论:62.8%的患者在scllm切除术后出现了TOLS。分阶段切除与同期切除相比,TOLS的发生率高出37%。在确定最佳手术入路时应考虑切除的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Textbook outcome in liver surgery after staged versus simultaneous resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

Background: We sought to define the likelihood of textbook outcome in liver surgery (TOLS) among patients undergoing simultaneous versus staged resection for sCRLM.

Methods: Patients with sCRLM who underwent curative-intent resection between 2000-2022 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. TOLS was defined by the absence of intraoperative grade ≥2 events, R1 resection margin, post-hepatectomy liver failure, bile leakage, major postoperative complications, in-hospital/90-day mortality, and 90-day readmission. Multivariable regression was utilized to study associations between surgical approach and TOLS.

Results: Among 897 patients with median age of 62 (IQR 55-69) years, 376 (41.9 %) patients underwent synchronous resection whereas 521 (58.1 %) patients had staged resection of sCRLM. 62.8 % of patients had TOLS following sCRLM resection and patients who underwent staged resection were more likely to have TOLS (staged: 65.8 % vs. simultaneous: 58.5 %, p = 0.025). Staged resection was associated with 37 % higher odds of TOLS (OR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.04-1.80) than simultaneous resection. Incidence of TOLS decreased with extensive resection (low-risk colectomy and minor hepatectomy: 69.6 % vs. high-risk colectomy and major hepatectomy: 2.8 %; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: 62.8 % of patients had TOLS following sCRLM resection. Staged versus simultaneous resection was associated with 37 % higher odds of TOLS. Extent of resection should be considered when determining the optimal operative approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hpb
Hpb GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: HPB is an international forum for clinical, scientific and educational communication. Twelve issues a year bring the reader leading articles, expert reviews, original articles, images, editorials, and reader correspondence encompassing all aspects of benign and malignant hepatobiliary disease and its management. HPB features relevant aspects of clinical and translational research and practice. Specific areas of interest include HPB diseases encountered globally by clinical practitioners in this specialist field of gastrointestinal surgery. The journal addresses the challenges faced in the management of cancer involving the liver, biliary system and pancreas. While surgical oncology represents a large part of HPB practice, submission of manuscripts relating to liver and pancreas transplantation, the treatment of benign conditions such as acute and chronic pancreatitis, and those relating to hepatobiliary infection and inflammation are also welcomed. There will be a focus on developing a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment with endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches, radiological interventions and surgical techniques being strongly represented. HPB welcomes submission of manuscripts in all these areas and in scientific focused research that has clear clinical relevance to HPB surgical practice. HPB aims to help its readers - surgeons, physicians, radiologists and basic scientists - to develop their knowledge and practice. HPB will be of interest to specialists involved in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease however will also inform those working in related fields. Abstracted and Indexed in: MEDLINE® EMBASE PubMed Science Citation Index Expanded Academic Search (EBSCO) HPB is owned by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and is also the official Journal of the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA), the Asian-Pacific Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) and the European-African Hepato-Pancreatic Biliary Association (E-AHPBA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信