在美国,表皮生长因子受体突变的非小细胞肺癌的耐药突变谱与当前治疗相关:系统文献综述。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Pratyusha Vadagam, Dexter Waters, Anil Bhagat, Yuting Kuang, Jennifer Uyei, Julie Vanderpoel
{"title":"在美国,表皮生长因子受体突变的非小细胞肺癌的耐药突变谱与当前治疗相关:系统文献综述。","authors":"Pratyusha Vadagam, Dexter Waters, Anil Bhagat, Yuting Kuang, Jennifer Uyei, Julie Vanderpoel","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32040191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment resistance due to gene alterations remains a challenge for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC). A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to describe resistance mutation profiles and their impact on clinical outcomes in adults with a/mNSCLC in the United States (US). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Embase (2018-August 2022) identified 2986 records. Among 45 included studies, osimertinib was the most commonly reported treatment (osimertinib alone: 15 studies; as one of the treatment options: 18 studies), followed by other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; 5 studies) and non-TKIs (1 study). For first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) osimertinib, the most frequent EGFR-dependent resistance mechanisms were T790M loss (1L: 15.4%; 2L: 20.5-49%) and C797X mutation (1L: 2.9-12.5%; 2L: 1.4-22%). EGFR-independent mechanisms included MET amplification (1L: 0.6-66%; 2L: 7.2-19%), TP53 mutation (1L: 29.2-33.3%), and CCNE1 amplification (1L: 7.9%; 2L: 10.3%). For patients receiving osimertinib, EGFR T790M mutation loss, EGFR/MET/HER2 amplification, RET fusion, and PIK3CA mutation were associated with worse progression-free survival. Resistance mechanisms resulting from current NSCLC treatments in the US are complex, underscoring the need to address such heterogeneous resistance profiles and improve outcomes for patients with EGFR-mutated a/mNSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12025648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resistance Mutation Profiles Associated with Current Treatments for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Pratyusha Vadagam, Dexter Waters, Anil Bhagat, Yuting Kuang, Jennifer Uyei, Julie Vanderpoel\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32040191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Treatment resistance due to gene alterations remains a challenge for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC). A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to describe resistance mutation profiles and their impact on clinical outcomes in adults with a/mNSCLC in the United States (US). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Embase (2018-August 2022) identified 2986 records. Among 45 included studies, osimertinib was the most commonly reported treatment (osimertinib alone: 15 studies; as one of the treatment options: 18 studies), followed by other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; 5 studies) and non-TKIs (1 study). For first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) osimertinib, the most frequent EGFR-dependent resistance mechanisms were T790M loss (1L: 15.4%; 2L: 20.5-49%) and C797X mutation (1L: 2.9-12.5%; 2L: 1.4-22%). EGFR-independent mechanisms included MET amplification (1L: 0.6-66%; 2L: 7.2-19%), TP53 mutation (1L: 29.2-33.3%), and CCNE1 amplification (1L: 7.9%; 2L: 10.3%). For patients receiving osimertinib, EGFR T790M mutation loss, EGFR/MET/HER2 amplification, RET fusion, and PIK3CA mutation were associated with worse progression-free survival. Resistance mechanisms resulting from current NSCLC treatments in the US are complex, underscoring the need to address such heterogeneous resistance profiles and improve outcomes for patients with EGFR-mutated a/mNSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12025648/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040191\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于egfr突变的晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(a/mNSCLC)患者来说,基因改变导致的治疗耐药仍然是一个挑战。在美国进行了一项系统的文献综述(SLR),以描述耐药突变谱及其对成人A /mNSCLC临床结果的影响。对MEDLINE和Embase(2018- 2022年8月)的全面搜索确定了2986条记录。在纳入的45项研究中,奥希替尼是最常报道的治疗方法(单独使用奥希替尼:15项研究;作为治疗方案之一:18项研究),其次是其他酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs;5项研究)和非tkis(1项研究)。对于一线(1L)和二线(2L)奥西替尼,最常见的egfr依赖性耐药机制是T790M损失(1L: 15.4%;2L: 20.5-49%)和C797X突变(1L: 2.9-12.5%;2 l: 1.4 - -22%)。与egfr无关的机制包括MET扩增(1L: 0.6-66%;2L: 7.2-19%), TP53突变(1L: 29.2-33.3%), CCNE1扩增(1L: 7.9%;2 l: 10.3%)。对于接受奥西替尼治疗的患者,EGFR T790M突变丢失、EGFR/MET/HER2扩增、RET融合和PIK3CA突变与更差的无进展生存相关。在美国,目前的非小细胞肺癌治疗产生的耐药机制是复杂的,强调需要解决这种异质性耐药概况,并改善egfr突变的a/mNSCLC患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resistance Mutation Profiles Associated with Current Treatments for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review.

Treatment resistance due to gene alterations remains a challenge for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC). A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to describe resistance mutation profiles and their impact on clinical outcomes in adults with a/mNSCLC in the United States (US). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Embase (2018-August 2022) identified 2986 records. Among 45 included studies, osimertinib was the most commonly reported treatment (osimertinib alone: 15 studies; as one of the treatment options: 18 studies), followed by other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; 5 studies) and non-TKIs (1 study). For first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) osimertinib, the most frequent EGFR-dependent resistance mechanisms were T790M loss (1L: 15.4%; 2L: 20.5-49%) and C797X mutation (1L: 2.9-12.5%; 2L: 1.4-22%). EGFR-independent mechanisms included MET amplification (1L: 0.6-66%; 2L: 7.2-19%), TP53 mutation (1L: 29.2-33.3%), and CCNE1 amplification (1L: 7.9%; 2L: 10.3%). For patients receiving osimertinib, EGFR T790M mutation loss, EGFR/MET/HER2 amplification, RET fusion, and PIK3CA mutation were associated with worse progression-free survival. Resistance mechanisms resulting from current NSCLC treatments in the US are complex, underscoring the need to address such heterogeneous resistance profiles and improve outcomes for patients with EGFR-mutated a/mNSCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信