蜂胶水溶液提取物降低乳牙粪肠球菌数量的体外研究。

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijod/7629615
Majd Refaay, Mhd Bashier Almonakel, Samar Alsalameh, Ibraheem Hawary, Yasser Alsayed Tolibah
{"title":"蜂胶水溶液提取物降低乳牙粪肠球菌数量的体外研究。","authors":"Majd Refaay, Mhd Bashier Almonakel, Samar Alsalameh, Ibraheem Hawary, Yasser Alsayed Tolibah","doi":"10.1155/ijod/7629615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the efficacy of 11% aqueous propolis extract in eliminating <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> in necrotic pulp canals of primary anterior teeth compared to 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. <b>Materials</b> and Methods: <i>E. faecalis</i> were isolated from necrotic primary anterior teeth with periapical lesions, cultured, and incubated using paper points. The research sample comprised 30 extracted single-rooted necrotic primary anterior teeth, divided equally into two groups according to the irrigants used. Access cavities were prepared, and working lengths were determined. Afterward, canals were shaped using K-files, contaminated with <i>E. faecalis</i>, and placed in an incubator for a week. Initial microbial swabs were taken, and then each canal was irrigated with either 3 mL of a hand-made 11% aqueous propolis extract or 3 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min. Postirrigation microbial swabs were taken, cultured on blood agar plates, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h, followed by colony counts. Statistical tests included the paired sample <i>T</i>-test, Wilcoxon signed ranks, and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests. The significance level was set at <i>α</i> = 0.05. <b>Results:</b> In total, 11% aqueous propolis extract contributed to a 61.8% reduction in <i>E. faecalis</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while 2.5% sodium hypochlorite contributed to an 84.1% reduction (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The average change in logarithmic values in the sodium hypochlorite group was more significant than in the propolis group (<i>p</i>=0.002). <b>Conclusion:</b> In total, 11% aqueous propolis extract is antimicrobial against <i>E. faecalis</i>. However, its efficacy was less than 2.5% sodium hypochlorite.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7629615"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11991864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Aqueous Propolis Extract in Reducing the <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> Count in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study.\",\"authors\":\"Majd Refaay, Mhd Bashier Almonakel, Samar Alsalameh, Ibraheem Hawary, Yasser Alsayed Tolibah\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijod/7629615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the efficacy of 11% aqueous propolis extract in eliminating <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> in necrotic pulp canals of primary anterior teeth compared to 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. <b>Materials</b> and Methods: <i>E. faecalis</i> were isolated from necrotic primary anterior teeth with periapical lesions, cultured, and incubated using paper points. The research sample comprised 30 extracted single-rooted necrotic primary anterior teeth, divided equally into two groups according to the irrigants used. Access cavities were prepared, and working lengths were determined. Afterward, canals were shaped using K-files, contaminated with <i>E. faecalis</i>, and placed in an incubator for a week. Initial microbial swabs were taken, and then each canal was irrigated with either 3 mL of a hand-made 11% aqueous propolis extract or 3 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min. Postirrigation microbial swabs were taken, cultured on blood agar plates, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h, followed by colony counts. Statistical tests included the paired sample <i>T</i>-test, Wilcoxon signed ranks, and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests. The significance level was set at <i>α</i> = 0.05. <b>Results:</b> In total, 11% aqueous propolis extract contributed to a 61.8% reduction in <i>E. faecalis</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while 2.5% sodium hypochlorite contributed to an 84.1% reduction (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The average change in logarithmic values in the sodium hypochlorite group was more significant than in the propolis group (<i>p</i>=0.002). <b>Conclusion:</b> In total, 11% aqueous propolis extract is antimicrobial against <i>E. faecalis</i>. However, its efficacy was less than 2.5% sodium hypochlorite.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"7629615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11991864/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/7629615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/7629615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较11%蜂胶水溶液提取物与2.5%次氯酸钠对前牙坏死髓管内粪肠球菌的清除效果。材料与方法:从有根尖周病变的坏死前牙中分离粪肠杆菌,用纸穴培养培养。研究样本为30颗拔除的单根坏死前牙,根据所使用的冲洗剂分为两组。制备了通道腔,并确定了工作长度。之后,用被粪肠杆菌污染的k锉塑造运河,并将其放在培养箱中一周。取初始微生物拭子,然后用3ml手工制作的11%蜂胶水溶液提取物或3ml 2.5%次氯酸钠冲洗每根管5分钟。取洗后微生物拭子,在血琼脂板上培养,37℃孵育48 h,然后进行菌落计数。统计检验包括配对样本t检验、Wilcoxon符号秩和Mann-Whitney U检验。显著性水平设为α = 0.05。结果:总而言之,11%蜂胶水溶液提取物对粪肠杆菌减少61.8% (p < 0.001),而2.5%次氯酸钠对粪肠杆菌减少84.1% (p < 0.001)。次氯酸钠组对数值的平均变化比蜂胶组更显著(p=0.002)。结论:蜂胶水提物对粪肠杆菌有一定的抗菌作用。但其疗效低于2.5%次氯酸钠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effectiveness of Aqueous Propolis Extract in Reducing the <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> Count in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study.

The Effectiveness of Aqueous Propolis Extract in Reducing the Enterococcus faecalis Count in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of 11% aqueous propolis extract in eliminating Enterococcus faecalis in necrotic pulp canals of primary anterior teeth compared to 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. Materials and Methods: E. faecalis were isolated from necrotic primary anterior teeth with periapical lesions, cultured, and incubated using paper points. The research sample comprised 30 extracted single-rooted necrotic primary anterior teeth, divided equally into two groups according to the irrigants used. Access cavities were prepared, and working lengths were determined. Afterward, canals were shaped using K-files, contaminated with E. faecalis, and placed in an incubator for a week. Initial microbial swabs were taken, and then each canal was irrigated with either 3 mL of a hand-made 11% aqueous propolis extract or 3 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min. Postirrigation microbial swabs were taken, cultured on blood agar plates, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h, followed by colony counts. Statistical tests included the paired sample T-test, Wilcoxon signed ranks, and Mann-Whitney U tests. The significance level was set at α = 0.05. Results: In total, 11% aqueous propolis extract contributed to a 61.8% reduction in E. faecalis (p < 0.001), while 2.5% sodium hypochlorite contributed to an 84.1% reduction (p < 0.001). The average change in logarithmic values in the sodium hypochlorite group was more significant than in the propolis group (p=0.002). Conclusion: In total, 11% aqueous propolis extract is antimicrobial against E. faecalis. However, its efficacy was less than 2.5% sodium hypochlorite.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信