与格斯·舒马赫营养激励计划资金相关的农产品处方项目的健康结果。

IF 12.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Carmen Byker Shanks, Michelle S Park, Amy L Yaroch, Eliza Short, Hilary K Seligman
{"title":"与格斯·舒马赫营养激励计划资金相关的农产品处方项目的健康结果。","authors":"Carmen Byker Shanks, Michelle S Park, Amy L Yaroch, Eliza Short, Hilary K Seligman","doi":"10.1146/annurev-nutr-111124-092627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US Department of Agriculture's Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP) funds produce prescription (PPR) programs that allow healthcare to support patients in accessing fruits and vegetables. This hybrid systematic narrative review identified 16 studies of PPR programs associated with GusNIP funding in some way that examined health outcomes, including clinical measures and healthcare utilization. Program designs were heterogeneous, sample sizes were generally small, and methodological rigor was often low, with most studies using a prepost design and none using a randomized control group. Fewer than half of the studies examining clinical values showed an association between PPR participation and improved health outcomes (for example, three of eight studies measuring weight or body mass index showed a statistically significant reduction, as well as two of the six studies measuring glycosylated hemoglobin). Only three studies examined healthcare utilization, two of which showed improvements in hospitalization and/or emergency department utilization. Overall, evidence for the health impact of PPRs is nascent but growing. PPRs with capacity should engage in rigorous study designs and examine a variety of downstream health and utilization outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8009,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Outcomes of Produce Prescription Programs Associated with Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program Funding.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Byker Shanks, Michelle S Park, Amy L Yaroch, Eliza Short, Hilary K Seligman\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-nutr-111124-092627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The US Department of Agriculture's Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP) funds produce prescription (PPR) programs that allow healthcare to support patients in accessing fruits and vegetables. This hybrid systematic narrative review identified 16 studies of PPR programs associated with GusNIP funding in some way that examined health outcomes, including clinical measures and healthcare utilization. Program designs were heterogeneous, sample sizes were generally small, and methodological rigor was often low, with most studies using a prepost design and none using a randomized control group. Fewer than half of the studies examining clinical values showed an association between PPR participation and improved health outcomes (for example, three of eight studies measuring weight or body mass index showed a statistically significant reduction, as well as two of the six studies measuring glycosylated hemoglobin). Only three studies examined healthcare utilization, two of which showed improvements in hospitalization and/or emergency department utilization. Overall, evidence for the health impact of PPRs is nascent but growing. PPRs with capacity should engage in rigorous study designs and examine a variety of downstream health and utilization outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual review of nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual review of nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-111124-092627\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-111124-092627","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国农业部的格斯·舒马赫营养激励计划(GusNIP)资助生产处方(PPR)计划,使医疗保健部门能够支持患者获得水果和蔬菜。这一混合系统的叙述性综述确定了16项与GusNIP资助相关的小反刍疫项目研究,这些研究以某种方式检查了健康结果,包括临床措施和医疗保健利用。程序设计是异质的,样本量通常较小,方法的严谨性通常较低,大多数研究使用前置设计,没有一个使用随机对照组。在检查临床价值的研究中,不到一半的研究显示参与小反胃反应与改善的健康结果之间存在关联(例如,8项测量体重或体重指数的研究中有3项显示统计上显著的减少,6项测量糖化血红蛋白的研究中有2项显示减少)。只有三项研究调查了医疗保健利用情况,其中两项研究显示住院和/或急诊室利用情况有所改善。总体而言,ppr对健康影响的证据尚不明确,但正在不断增加。有能力的ppr应进行严格的研究设计,并检查各种下游健康和利用结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Outcomes of Produce Prescription Programs Associated with Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program Funding.

The US Department of Agriculture's Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP) funds produce prescription (PPR) programs that allow healthcare to support patients in accessing fruits and vegetables. This hybrid systematic narrative review identified 16 studies of PPR programs associated with GusNIP funding in some way that examined health outcomes, including clinical measures and healthcare utilization. Program designs were heterogeneous, sample sizes were generally small, and methodological rigor was often low, with most studies using a prepost design and none using a randomized control group. Fewer than half of the studies examining clinical values showed an association between PPR participation and improved health outcomes (for example, three of eight studies measuring weight or body mass index showed a statistically significant reduction, as well as two of the six studies measuring glycosylated hemoglobin). Only three studies examined healthcare utilization, two of which showed improvements in hospitalization and/or emergency department utilization. Overall, evidence for the health impact of PPRs is nascent but growing. PPRs with capacity should engage in rigorous study designs and examine a variety of downstream health and utilization outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annual review of nutrition
Annual review of nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Annual Review of Nutrition Publication History:In publication since 1981 Scope:Covers significant developments in the field of nutrition Topics Covered Include: Energy metabolism; Carbohydrates; Lipids; Proteins and amino acids; Vitamins; Minerals; Nutrient transport and function; Metabolic regulation; Nutritional genomics; Molecular and cell biology; Clinical nutrition; Comparative nutrition; Nutritional anthropology; Nutritional toxicology; Nutritional microbiology; Epidemiology; Public health nutrition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信