四种康复方法联合rTMS对脑卒中患者认知、情绪和生活质量的疗效比较。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Haojie Li, Xinyu Lin, Nan Chen, Xie Wu
{"title":"四种康复方法联合rTMS对脑卒中患者认知、情绪和生活质量的疗效比较。","authors":"Haojie Li, Xinyu Lin, Nan Chen, Xie Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with various rehabilitation methods in improving cognitive function, negative mood, and quality of life in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across six databases to identify relevant studies. The time frame of the search was from January 1980 to September 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>A total of 21 randomized controlled trials involving 1074 stroke patients were included in the analysis based on predefined eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Outcome indicators assessed included cognitive function, negative mood, and quality of life. Data were extracted and analyzed using Stata for net meta-analysis to evaluate the relative effectiveness of each combined intervention.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Registration number: CRD42024603130. The results indicated that speech rehabilitation (SR) combined with rTMS was the most effective in improving cognitive function (SMD=0.40; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.87; SUCRA=95.1%). Cognitive rehabilitation (CR) combined with rTMS was found to be the most effective in reducing negative mood (SMD=0.91; 95% CI, 0.45-3.23; SUCRA=84.5%) and improving quality of life (SMD=0.49; 95% CI, -0.33 to 1.30; SUCRA=99.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of SR with rTMS is effective for enhancing cognitive function, whereas CR with rTMS is superior in alleviating negative emotions and improving quality of life. These findings suggest prioritizing these combined interventions in clinical rehabilitation settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Four Comparative Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Methods Combined With rTMS on Cognition, Mood, and Quality of Life in Stroke Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Haojie Li, Xinyu Lin, Nan Chen, Xie Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with various rehabilitation methods in improving cognitive function, negative mood, and quality of life in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across six databases to identify relevant studies. The time frame of the search was from January 1980 to September 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>A total of 21 randomized controlled trials involving 1074 stroke patients were included in the analysis based on predefined eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Outcome indicators assessed included cognitive function, negative mood, and quality of life. Data were extracted and analyzed using Stata for net meta-analysis to evaluate the relative effectiveness of each combined intervention.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Registration number: CRD42024603130. The results indicated that speech rehabilitation (SR) combined with rTMS was the most effective in improving cognitive function (SMD=0.40; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.87; SUCRA=95.1%). Cognitive rehabilitation (CR) combined with rTMS was found to be the most effective in reducing negative mood (SMD=0.91; 95% CI, 0.45-3.23; SUCRA=84.5%) and improving quality of life (SMD=0.49; 95% CI, -0.33 to 1.30; SUCRA=99.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of SR with rTMS is effective for enhancing cognitive function, whereas CR with rTMS is superior in alleviating negative emotions and improving quality of life. These findings suggest prioritizing these combined interventions in clinical rehabilitation settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过系统回顾和网络荟萃分析,评价反复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)联合多种康复方法对脑卒中患者认知功能、负性情绪和生活质量的改善效果。数据来源:对六个数据库进行系统检索,以确定相关研究。搜索的时间范围是从1980年1月到2024年9月。研究选择:共有21项随机对照试验,涉及1074例卒中患者,根据预定义的资格标准纳入分析。数据提取:评估的结局指标包括认知功能、消极情绪和生活质量。数据提取和分析使用Stata进行净荟萃分析,以评估每种联合干预措施的相对有效性。数据综合:注册号:CRD42024603130。结果表明,言语康复联合rTMS对认知功能的改善效果最好(SMD= 0.40, 95% CI: -0.08 ~ 0.87;SUCRA = 95.1%)。认知康复(CR)联合rTMS对减少负性情绪最有效(SMD = 0.91,95% CI: 0.45 ~ 3.23;SUCRA = 84.5%)和改善生活质量(SMD = 0.49,95% CI: -0.33 ~ 1.30;SUCRA = 99.4%)。结论:言语康复(SR)联合rTMS可有效增强认知功能,而认知康复(CR)联合rTMS在缓解患者负性情绪、改善患者生活质量方面效果更佳。这些发现建议在临床康复环境中优先考虑这些联合干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Four Comparative Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Methods Combined With rTMS on Cognition, Mood, and Quality of Life in Stroke Patients.

Objective: To conduct systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with various rehabilitation methods in improving cognitive function, negative mood, and quality of life in stroke patients.

Data sources: A systematic search was conducted across six databases to identify relevant studies. The time frame of the search was from January 1980 to September 2024.

Study selection: A total of 21 randomized controlled trials involving 1074 stroke patients were included in the analysis based on predefined eligibility criteria.

Data extraction: Outcome indicators assessed included cognitive function, negative mood, and quality of life. Data were extracted and analyzed using Stata for net meta-analysis to evaluate the relative effectiveness of each combined intervention.

Data synthesis: Registration number: CRD42024603130. The results indicated that speech rehabilitation (SR) combined with rTMS was the most effective in improving cognitive function (SMD=0.40; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.87; SUCRA=95.1%). Cognitive rehabilitation (CR) combined with rTMS was found to be the most effective in reducing negative mood (SMD=0.91; 95% CI, 0.45-3.23; SUCRA=84.5%) and improving quality of life (SMD=0.49; 95% CI, -0.33 to 1.30; SUCRA=99.4%).

Conclusions: The combination of SR with rTMS is effective for enhancing cognitive function, whereas CR with rTMS is superior in alleviating negative emotions and improving quality of life. These findings suggest prioritizing these combined interventions in clinical rehabilitation settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信