安大略省土著人民对分娩疏散的反应:通过土著助产士主导的方法概念化风险。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Erika Campbell, Melanie Murdock, Sarah Durant, Carole Couchie, Carmel Meekis, Charitie Rae, Julie Kenequanash, Lisa Boivin, Jacob Barry, Arthi Erika Jeymohan, Karen Lawford
{"title":"安大略省土著人民对分娩疏散的反应:通过土著助产士主导的方法概念化风险。","authors":"Erika Campbell, Melanie Murdock, Sarah Durant, Carole Couchie, Carmel Meekis, Charitie Rae, Julie Kenequanash, Lisa Boivin, Jacob Barry, Arthi Erika Jeymohan, Karen Lawford","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02491-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, pregnant Indigenous Peoples living in remote, rural, and northern Indigenous communities in Canada are subjected to evacuation birth policy, whereby they are evacuated out of their community to large, urban hospitals to give birth. Evacuation for birth is assumed to decrease biomedical risk because people are birthing in hospitals. In Canadian health systems, evaluating and mitigating biomedical risk has become a standard in health decision-making but this framework disregards Indigenous ontologies and epistemologies that guide Indigenous people in their evaluation of health risk. In this study, we sought to understand how pregnant Indigenous people in Ontario conceptualise health and risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data through semi-structured interviews with 43 participants who have been evacuated for birth or are kin of an evacuee who live in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Risks associated with evacuation for birth were conceptualised by participants in a wholistic manner based on principles of self-determination. Participants identified multiple risks that shaped their overall assessment of health risk when facing evacuation for birth including the risk of being separated from kin, confronting a lack of health services, and experiencing discrimination. As participants spoke about risk, they reimagined perinatal care to mitigate these risks, which requires bringing birth back to Indigenous communities through Indigenous midwifery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We outline actions to limit the practice of evacuation for birth, support the return of birth to Indigenous communities, and expand understandings of risk within policy and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"135"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigenous Peoples' responses to evacuation for birth in Ontario: conceptualizing risk through an Indigenous midwifery-led approach.\",\"authors\":\"Erika Campbell, Melanie Murdock, Sarah Durant, Carole Couchie, Carmel Meekis, Charitie Rae, Julie Kenequanash, Lisa Boivin, Jacob Barry, Arthi Erika Jeymohan, Karen Lawford\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12939-025-02491-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, pregnant Indigenous Peoples living in remote, rural, and northern Indigenous communities in Canada are subjected to evacuation birth policy, whereby they are evacuated out of their community to large, urban hospitals to give birth. Evacuation for birth is assumed to decrease biomedical risk because people are birthing in hospitals. In Canadian health systems, evaluating and mitigating biomedical risk has become a standard in health decision-making but this framework disregards Indigenous ontologies and epistemologies that guide Indigenous people in their evaluation of health risk. In this study, we sought to understand how pregnant Indigenous people in Ontario conceptualise health and risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data through semi-structured interviews with 43 participants who have been evacuated for birth or are kin of an evacuee who live in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Risks associated with evacuation for birth were conceptualised by participants in a wholistic manner based on principles of self-determination. Participants identified multiple risks that shaped their overall assessment of health risk when facing evacuation for birth including the risk of being separated from kin, confronting a lack of health services, and experiencing discrimination. As participants spoke about risk, they reimagined perinatal care to mitigate these risks, which requires bringing birth back to Indigenous communities through Indigenous midwifery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We outline actions to limit the practice of evacuation for birth, support the return of birth to Indigenous communities, and expand understandings of risk within policy and clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070555/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02491-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02491-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,居住在加拿大偏远、农村和北部土著社区的怀孕土著人民实行疏散生育政策,即将她们从社区疏散到大型城市医院分娩。分娩疏散被认为可以降低生物医学风险,因为人们是在医院分娩的。在加拿大卫生系统中,评估和减轻生物医学风险已成为卫生决策的标准,但该框架忽视了指导土著人民评估健康风险的土著本体论和认识论。在这项研究中,我们试图了解安大略省怀孕的土著居民是如何理解健康和风险的。方法:我们通过半结构化访谈收集了43名参与者的数据,这些参与者因出生而被疏散,或者是居住在加拿大安大略省的撤离者的亲属。结果:与分娩疏散相关的风险是由参与者以基于自决原则的整体方式概念化的。与会者确定了多种风险,这些风险影响了他们在面临撤离分娩时对健康风险的总体评估,包括与亲属分离的风险、面临缺乏保健服务的风险和遭受歧视的风险。当与会者谈到风险时,他们重新设想了围产期护理以减轻这些风险,这需要通过土著助产将生育带回土著社区。结论:我们概述了限制分娩疏散实践的行动,支持分娩返回土著社区,并在政策和临床实践中扩大对风险的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indigenous Peoples' responses to evacuation for birth in Ontario: conceptualizing risk through an Indigenous midwifery-led approach.

Background: Currently, pregnant Indigenous Peoples living in remote, rural, and northern Indigenous communities in Canada are subjected to evacuation birth policy, whereby they are evacuated out of their community to large, urban hospitals to give birth. Evacuation for birth is assumed to decrease biomedical risk because people are birthing in hospitals. In Canadian health systems, evaluating and mitigating biomedical risk has become a standard in health decision-making but this framework disregards Indigenous ontologies and epistemologies that guide Indigenous people in their evaluation of health risk. In this study, we sought to understand how pregnant Indigenous people in Ontario conceptualise health and risk.

Methods: We collected data through semi-structured interviews with 43 participants who have been evacuated for birth or are kin of an evacuee who live in Ontario, Canada.

Results: Risks associated with evacuation for birth were conceptualised by participants in a wholistic manner based on principles of self-determination. Participants identified multiple risks that shaped their overall assessment of health risk when facing evacuation for birth including the risk of being separated from kin, confronting a lack of health services, and experiencing discrimination. As participants spoke about risk, they reimagined perinatal care to mitigate these risks, which requires bringing birth back to Indigenous communities through Indigenous midwifery.

Conclusions: We outline actions to limit the practice of evacuation for birth, support the return of birth to Indigenous communities, and expand understandings of risk within policy and clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信