在血液透析过程中,空气微泡的污染可能发生在所有被调查的测量点。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Per Jonsson, Bernd Georg Stegmayr
{"title":"在血液透析过程中,空气微泡的污染可能发生在所有被调查的测量点。","authors":"Per Jonsson, Bernd Georg Stegmayr","doi":"10.1177/03913988251334953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microbubbles (MBs) of air occur in the hemodialysis (HD) extracorporeal circuit and may enter the bloodlines of the patient. The aim of the present study was to investigate possible sites of contamination. Seventeen patients performed 20 HD (Baxter AK200S <i>n</i> = 5 and Artis <i>n</i> = 15) and 930 ultrasound measurements of MBs/min (Hatteland CMD10 device). Detection ranges were diameters between 2.5 and 50 µm. Hemodiafiltration with postdilution (HDF-post) was performed in 14 dialyses, predilution (HDF-pre) in 1 dialysis, and HD using hemocontrol (HDhc) in 5 dialyses. Measurement points were M1-after the blood access, M2-before the dialyzer, M3-after the dialyzer, and M4-after the venous chamber. At each point, 10 measures of MBs were performed. MB contamination of the blood was larger at all points when the access was an arteriovenous fistula compared to a central dialysis catheter (<i>p</i> < 0.001). MB levels with the AK200 versus the Artis were lower at M1, higher at M2 (<i>p</i> ⩽ 0.005), and were similar at M3 and M4. HDF-pre had fewer MBs than HDF-post, whereas HDhc had more MBs than HDF-post (<i>p</i> < 0.001). An increase of MBs was seen at M2 during an internal \"Autotest.\" No air alarms were induced during dialyses. MBs were detected in the extra corporeal circuit at all points investigated. The venous chambers used did not significantly reduce contamination. The detected MBs did not induce air alarms when the blood returned to the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":13932,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":" ","pages":"310-317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contamination of microbubbles of air may occur at all investigated measurement points during hemodialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Per Jonsson, Bernd Georg Stegmayr\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03913988251334953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Microbubbles (MBs) of air occur in the hemodialysis (HD) extracorporeal circuit and may enter the bloodlines of the patient. The aim of the present study was to investigate possible sites of contamination. Seventeen patients performed 20 HD (Baxter AK200S <i>n</i> = 5 and Artis <i>n</i> = 15) and 930 ultrasound measurements of MBs/min (Hatteland CMD10 device). Detection ranges were diameters between 2.5 and 50 µm. Hemodiafiltration with postdilution (HDF-post) was performed in 14 dialyses, predilution (HDF-pre) in 1 dialysis, and HD using hemocontrol (HDhc) in 5 dialyses. Measurement points were M1-after the blood access, M2-before the dialyzer, M3-after the dialyzer, and M4-after the venous chamber. At each point, 10 measures of MBs were performed. MB contamination of the blood was larger at all points when the access was an arteriovenous fistula compared to a central dialysis catheter (<i>p</i> < 0.001). MB levels with the AK200 versus the Artis were lower at M1, higher at M2 (<i>p</i> ⩽ 0.005), and were similar at M3 and M4. HDF-pre had fewer MBs than HDF-post, whereas HDhc had more MBs than HDF-post (<i>p</i> < 0.001). An increase of MBs was seen at M2 during an internal \\\"Autotest.\\\" No air alarms were induced during dialyses. MBs were detected in the extra corporeal circuit at all points investigated. The venous chambers used did not significantly reduce contamination. The detected MBs did not induce air alarms when the blood returned to the patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Artificial Organs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"310-317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152285/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Artificial Organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988251334953\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988251334953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空气微泡(mb)出现在血液透析(HD)体外回路中,并可能进入患者的血液。本研究的目的是调查可能的污染地点。17例患者进行了20例HD (Baxter AK200S n = 5, Artis n = 15)和930例mb /min的超声测量(hateland CMD10装置)。检测范围直径在2.5到50µm之间。14例透析采用稀释后血液滤过(HDF-post), 1例透析采用稀释前血液滤过(HDF-pre), 5例透析采用血液控制(HDhc)。测量点分别为血液进入后m1、透析前m2、透析后m3、静脉腔后m4。在每个点进行10次mb测量。与中心透析导管相比,当通道为动静脉瘘时,血液的MB污染在所有点都更大(p < 0.005), M3和M4相似。HDF-pre比HDF-post有更少的mb,而HDhc比HDF-post有更多的mb
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contamination of microbubbles of air may occur at all investigated measurement points during hemodialysis.

Microbubbles (MBs) of air occur in the hemodialysis (HD) extracorporeal circuit and may enter the bloodlines of the patient. The aim of the present study was to investigate possible sites of contamination. Seventeen patients performed 20 HD (Baxter AK200S n = 5 and Artis n = 15) and 930 ultrasound measurements of MBs/min (Hatteland CMD10 device). Detection ranges were diameters between 2.5 and 50 µm. Hemodiafiltration with postdilution (HDF-post) was performed in 14 dialyses, predilution (HDF-pre) in 1 dialysis, and HD using hemocontrol (HDhc) in 5 dialyses. Measurement points were M1-after the blood access, M2-before the dialyzer, M3-after the dialyzer, and M4-after the venous chamber. At each point, 10 measures of MBs were performed. MB contamination of the blood was larger at all points when the access was an arteriovenous fistula compared to a central dialysis catheter (p < 0.001). MB levels with the AK200 versus the Artis were lower at M1, higher at M2 (p ⩽ 0.005), and were similar at M3 and M4. HDF-pre had fewer MBs than HDF-post, whereas HDhc had more MBs than HDF-post (p < 0.001). An increase of MBs was seen at M2 during an internal "Autotest." No air alarms were induced during dialyses. MBs were detected in the extra corporeal circuit at all points investigated. The venous chambers used did not significantly reduce contamination. The detected MBs did not induce air alarms when the blood returned to the patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Artificial Organs
International Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Artificial Organs (IJAO) publishes peer-reviewed research and clinical, experimental and theoretical, contributions to the field of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs. The mission of the IJAO is to foster the development and optimization of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs, for implantation or use in procedures, to treat functional deficits of all human tissues and organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信