{"title":"单肺通气中吸痰时间对肺塌陷的影响。","authors":"Lihua Hang, Jiajun Ju, Yulin Li, Min He","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1532176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of suction duration on lung collapse when using a bronchial blocker (BB) during single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with one-lung ventilation (OLV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 112 patients (39 males, 73 females; aged 18-75 years) with ASA physical status I or II undergoing single-port VATS under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into four groups: control (0 s), 30 s, 60 s, and 90 s suction groups (-30 cmH₂O; <i>n</i> = 28/group). Lung collapse scores (LCS) were recorded immediately after thoracoscope entry (T0) and at 10 min (T10). The expression of nitric oxide synthase 3 (NOS-3) mRNA in lung tissue was analyzed using PCR. Lung injury pathology scores, the wet-to-dry weight ratio (W/D) of lung tissue, intraoperative hypoxemia, perioperative pulmonary complications, and use of disconnection techniques for inadequate collapse were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T<sub>0</sub>, LCS in the 30 s, 60 s, and 90 s groups were significantly higher than in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05), with no differences among the suction groups. At T<sub>10</sub>, LCS in the 60 s and 90 s groups were significantly higher than in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed between the 30 s and control groups. NOS-3 mRNA expression, lung injury pathology scores, and W/D ratios were comparable across groups. No severe hypoxemia or pulmonary complications occurred. Rescue techniques were required in four control group patients and one patient in the 30 s group but not in the 60 s and 90 s groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Suction at -30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O for 60 s immediately after pleural incision during one-lung ventilation with a bronchial blocker in single-port VATS significantly improves lung collapse quality without causing lung injury, making it a clinically recommended practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1532176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of suction duration on lung collapse during one-lung ventilation.\",\"authors\":\"Lihua Hang, Jiajun Ju, Yulin Li, Min He\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1532176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of suction duration on lung collapse when using a bronchial blocker (BB) during single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with one-lung ventilation (OLV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 112 patients (39 males, 73 females; aged 18-75 years) with ASA physical status I or II undergoing single-port VATS under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into four groups: control (0 s), 30 s, 60 s, and 90 s suction groups (-30 cmH₂O; <i>n</i> = 28/group). Lung collapse scores (LCS) were recorded immediately after thoracoscope entry (T0) and at 10 min (T10). The expression of nitric oxide synthase 3 (NOS-3) mRNA in lung tissue was analyzed using PCR. Lung injury pathology scores, the wet-to-dry weight ratio (W/D) of lung tissue, intraoperative hypoxemia, perioperative pulmonary complications, and use of disconnection techniques for inadequate collapse were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T<sub>0</sub>, LCS in the 30 s, 60 s, and 90 s groups were significantly higher than in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05), with no differences among the suction groups. At T<sub>10</sub>, LCS in the 60 s and 90 s groups were significantly higher than in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed between the 30 s and control groups. NOS-3 mRNA expression, lung injury pathology scores, and W/D ratios were comparable across groups. No severe hypoxemia or pulmonary complications occurred. Rescue techniques were required in four control group patients and one patient in the 30 s group but not in the 60 s and 90 s groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Suction at -30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O for 60 s immediately after pleural incision during one-lung ventilation with a bronchial blocker in single-port VATS significantly improves lung collapse quality without causing lung injury, making it a clinically recommended practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1532176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994604/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1532176\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1532176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of suction duration on lung collapse during one-lung ventilation.
Objective: To investigate the effect of suction duration on lung collapse when using a bronchial blocker (BB) during single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with one-lung ventilation (OLV).
Methods: This study included 112 patients (39 males, 73 females; aged 18-75 years) with ASA physical status I or II undergoing single-port VATS under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into four groups: control (0 s), 30 s, 60 s, and 90 s suction groups (-30 cmH₂O; n = 28/group). Lung collapse scores (LCS) were recorded immediately after thoracoscope entry (T0) and at 10 min (T10). The expression of nitric oxide synthase 3 (NOS-3) mRNA in lung tissue was analyzed using PCR. Lung injury pathology scores, the wet-to-dry weight ratio (W/D) of lung tissue, intraoperative hypoxemia, perioperative pulmonary complications, and use of disconnection techniques for inadequate collapse were documented.
Results: At T0, LCS in the 30 s, 60 s, and 90 s groups were significantly higher than in the control group (P < 0.05), with no differences among the suction groups. At T10, LCS in the 60 s and 90 s groups were significantly higher than in the control group (P < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed between the 30 s and control groups. NOS-3 mRNA expression, lung injury pathology scores, and W/D ratios were comparable across groups. No severe hypoxemia or pulmonary complications occurred. Rescue techniques were required in four control group patients and one patient in the 30 s group but not in the 60 s and 90 s groups (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Suction at -30 cmH2O for 60 s immediately after pleural incision during one-lung ventilation with a bronchial blocker in single-port VATS significantly improves lung collapse quality without causing lung injury, making it a clinically recommended practice.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.