铜敷料比负压伤口治疗在糖尿病伤口愈合中的非劣效性:一项随机临床试验。

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Eyal Melamed, Jihad Dabbah, Talia Israel, Ilana Kan, Michael S Pinzur, Tohar Roth, Gadi Borkow
{"title":"铜敷料比负压伤口治疗在糖尿病伤口愈合中的非劣效性:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Eyal Melamed, Jihad Dabbah, Talia Israel, Ilana Kan, Michael S Pinzur, Tohar Roth, Gadi Borkow","doi":"10.1089/wound.2024.0273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate if treatment of diabetic wounds by copper oxide impregnated dressings (COD) is noninferior to negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). <b>Approach:</b> Following the CONSORT guidelines, patients with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) and noninfected wounds eligible for treatment with NPWT were randomized into two groups. One group received NPWT followed by standard wound care dressings, whereas the other was treated exclusively with COD. The primary outcome was wound size reduction, measured blindly using a 3D wound-imaging system. Secondary outcomes included patient and caregiver convenience (assessed <i>via</i> visual analog scores), cost, and additional wound parameters. <b>Results:</b> COD showed statistically significant noninferiority to NPWT in wound size reduction throughout the study (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The percentage of wounds that closed was 47.83% (11/23) and 34.78% (8/23) in the COD and NPWT arms, respectively (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The average time to wound closure, adjusted to potential confounders, such as gender, age, body mass index, diabetes, and smokers, was similar in both arms (<i>p</i> > 0.05). COD were found to be more convenient than NPWT for both patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and caregivers (<i>p</i> = 0.003), with a significantly shorter application time (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The COD cost was 14% of NPWT cost ($470 compared with $3,360). <b>Innovation:</b> COD may be considered as the first line of treatment for diabetic foot wounds when NPWT seems indicated. <b>Conclusions:</b> Using copper dressings as a first line of treatment of diabetic wounds, when NPWT is indicated, is expected to reduce health costs, improve convenience, and increase compliance without compromising the final outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninferiority of Copper Dressings Than Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Healing Diabetic Wounds: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Eyal Melamed, Jihad Dabbah, Talia Israel, Ilana Kan, Michael S Pinzur, Tohar Roth, Gadi Borkow\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/wound.2024.0273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate if treatment of diabetic wounds by copper oxide impregnated dressings (COD) is noninferior to negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). <b>Approach:</b> Following the CONSORT guidelines, patients with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) and noninfected wounds eligible for treatment with NPWT were randomized into two groups. One group received NPWT followed by standard wound care dressings, whereas the other was treated exclusively with COD. The primary outcome was wound size reduction, measured blindly using a 3D wound-imaging system. Secondary outcomes included patient and caregiver convenience (assessed <i>via</i> visual analog scores), cost, and additional wound parameters. <b>Results:</b> COD showed statistically significant noninferiority to NPWT in wound size reduction throughout the study (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The percentage of wounds that closed was 47.83% (11/23) and 34.78% (8/23) in the COD and NPWT arms, respectively (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The average time to wound closure, adjusted to potential confounders, such as gender, age, body mass index, diabetes, and smokers, was similar in both arms (<i>p</i> > 0.05). COD were found to be more convenient than NPWT for both patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and caregivers (<i>p</i> = 0.003), with a significantly shorter application time (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The COD cost was 14% of NPWT cost ($470 compared with $3,360). <b>Innovation:</b> COD may be considered as the first line of treatment for diabetic foot wounds when NPWT seems indicated. <b>Conclusions:</b> Using copper dressings as a first line of treatment of diabetic wounds, when NPWT is indicated, is expected to reduce health costs, improve convenience, and increase compliance without compromising the final outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in wound care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2024.0273\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2024.0273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价氧化铜浸渍敷料(COD)治疗糖尿病创面是否优于负压创面治疗(NPWT)。方法:根据CONSORT指南,将符合NPWT治疗条件的糖尿病(1型或2型)和非感染伤口患者随机分为两组。一组接受NPWT治疗后再使用标准伤口护理敷料,而另一组只接受COD治疗。主要结果是伤口缩小,使用3D伤口成像系统盲目测量。次要结局包括患者和护理人员的便利性(通过视觉模拟评分评估)、成本和其他伤口参数。结果:在整个研究过程中,COD与NPWT在伤口缩小方面的非劣效性有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。COD组创面愈合率为47.83% (11/23),NPWT组创面愈合率为34.78% (8/23)(p < 0.05)。在排除潜在混杂因素(如性别、年龄、体重指数、糖尿病和吸烟者)后,两组患者伤口愈合的平均时间相似(p < 0.05)。对于患者(p < 0.001)和护理人员(p = 0.003)而言,COD比NPWT更方便,应用时间显著缩短(p < 0.001)。COD成本为NPWT成本的14%(470美元,而NPWT成本为3,360美元)。创新:当需要NPWT时,COD可能被认为是糖尿病足部伤口的第一线治疗。结论:使用铜敷料作为糖尿病伤口的第一线治疗,当NPWT指征时,有望降低医疗成本,改善便利性,提高依从性,而不会影响最终结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noninferiority of Copper Dressings Than Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Healing Diabetic Wounds: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Objective: To evaluate if treatment of diabetic wounds by copper oxide impregnated dressings (COD) is noninferior to negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Approach: Following the CONSORT guidelines, patients with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) and noninfected wounds eligible for treatment with NPWT were randomized into two groups. One group received NPWT followed by standard wound care dressings, whereas the other was treated exclusively with COD. The primary outcome was wound size reduction, measured blindly using a 3D wound-imaging system. Secondary outcomes included patient and caregiver convenience (assessed via visual analog scores), cost, and additional wound parameters. Results: COD showed statistically significant noninferiority to NPWT in wound size reduction throughout the study (p < 0.01). The percentage of wounds that closed was 47.83% (11/23) and 34.78% (8/23) in the COD and NPWT arms, respectively (p > 0.05). The average time to wound closure, adjusted to potential confounders, such as gender, age, body mass index, diabetes, and smokers, was similar in both arms (p > 0.05). COD were found to be more convenient than NPWT for both patients (p < 0.001) and caregivers (p = 0.003), with a significantly shorter application time (p < 0.001). The COD cost was 14% of NPWT cost ($470 compared with $3,360). Innovation: COD may be considered as the first line of treatment for diabetic foot wounds when NPWT seems indicated. Conclusions: Using copper dressings as a first line of treatment of diabetic wounds, when NPWT is indicated, is expected to reduce health costs, improve convenience, and increase compliance without compromising the final outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信