抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体治疗阿尔茨海默病的不确定性:未来的挑战。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Madia Lozupone, Vittorio Dibello, Emanuela Resta, Rodolfo Sardone, Fabio Castellana, Roberta Zupo, Luisa Lampignano, Ilaria Bortone, Anita Mollica, Giuseppe Berardino, Mario Altamura, Antonello Bellomo, Antonio Daniele, Vincenzo Solfrizzi, Francesco Panza
{"title":"抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体治疗阿尔茨海默病的不确定性:未来的挑战。","authors":"Madia Lozupone, Vittorio Dibello, Emanuela Resta, Rodolfo Sardone, Fabio Castellana, Roberta Zupo, Luisa Lampignano, Ilaria Bortone, Anita Mollica, Giuseppe Berardino, Mario Altamura, Antonello Bellomo, Antonio Daniele, Vincenzo Solfrizzi, Francesco Panza","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2500752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD), the leading cause of dementia, poses a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems worldwide. After two decades of extensive efforts, we are still without significantly effective disease-modifying drugs for AD. Although brain amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation may predict cognitive decline, several drug candidates, including anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies, have been developed and tested to reduce Aβ plaque burden effective, but without significant clinical success.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The following review presents and discusses anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody therapeutics used to treat AD. The article considers both current approaches and alternatives. This article is multiple database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Ovid and Google Scholar) on all the available literature up to 1 February 2025.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of anti-Aβ drugs in AD have not fully validated the Aβ cascade hypothesis. Nevertheless, eight anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies have, thus far, made it to Phase III RCTs. Moving forward, the use of the Apolipoprotein E genotype and tau protein as alternative biomarkers can assist clinicians in providing patients with even more individualized and efficacious anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies dosing regimens and reduce the risk of serious amyloid-related imaging abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainties in anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody therapy for Alzheimer's disease: the challenges ahead.\",\"authors\":\"Madia Lozupone, Vittorio Dibello, Emanuela Resta, Rodolfo Sardone, Fabio Castellana, Roberta Zupo, Luisa Lampignano, Ilaria Bortone, Anita Mollica, Giuseppe Berardino, Mario Altamura, Antonello Bellomo, Antonio Daniele, Vincenzo Solfrizzi, Francesco Panza\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737175.2025.2500752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD), the leading cause of dementia, poses a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems worldwide. After two decades of extensive efforts, we are still without significantly effective disease-modifying drugs for AD. Although brain amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation may predict cognitive decline, several drug candidates, including anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies, have been developed and tested to reduce Aβ plaque burden effective, but without significant clinical success.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The following review presents and discusses anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody therapeutics used to treat AD. The article considers both current approaches and alternatives. This article is multiple database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Ovid and Google Scholar) on all the available literature up to 1 February 2025.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of anti-Aβ drugs in AD have not fully validated the Aβ cascade hypothesis. Nevertheless, eight anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies have, thus far, made it to Phase III RCTs. Moving forward, the use of the Apolipoprotein E genotype and tau protein as alternative biomarkers can assist clinicians in providing patients with even more individualized and efficacious anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies dosing regimens and reduce the risk of serious amyloid-related imaging abnormalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2500752\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2500752","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿尔茨海默病(AD)是痴呆症的主要原因,对全世界的患者、护理人员和医疗保健系统造成了重大负担。经过二十年的广泛努力,我们仍然没有明显有效的AD疾病改善药物。尽管脑淀粉样蛋白-β (Aβ)积累可能预测认知能力下降,但一些候选药物,包括抗Aβ单克隆抗体,已经开发并测试了减少Aβ斑块负担的有效方法,但没有显著的临床成功。涉及领域:以下综述介绍并讨论了用于治疗AD的抗a β单克隆抗体治疗方法。本文考虑了当前的方法和替代方法。本文是对截至2025年2月1日的所有可用文献的多个数据库(MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Ovid和谷歌Scholar)检索。专家意见:抗Aβ药物治疗AD的随机临床试验(rct)尚未完全验证Aβ级联假说。尽管如此,到目前为止,已有8种抗a β单克隆抗体进入了III期随机对照试验。展望未来,使用载脂蛋白E基因型和tau蛋白作为替代生物标志物可以帮助临床医生为患者提供更个性化和有效的抗a β单克隆抗体给药方案,并降低严重淀粉样蛋白相关成像异常的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uncertainties in anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody therapy for Alzheimer's disease: the challenges ahead.

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD), the leading cause of dementia, poses a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems worldwide. After two decades of extensive efforts, we are still without significantly effective disease-modifying drugs for AD. Although brain amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation may predict cognitive decline, several drug candidates, including anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies, have been developed and tested to reduce Aβ plaque burden effective, but without significant clinical success.

Areas covered: The following review presents and discusses anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody therapeutics used to treat AD. The article considers both current approaches and alternatives. This article is multiple database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Ovid and Google Scholar) on all the available literature up to 1 February 2025.

Expert opinion: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of anti-Aβ drugs in AD have not fully validated the Aβ cascade hypothesis. Nevertheless, eight anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies have, thus far, made it to Phase III RCTs. Moving forward, the use of the Apolipoprotein E genotype and tau protein as alternative biomarkers can assist clinicians in providing patients with even more individualized and efficacious anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies dosing regimens and reduce the risk of serious amyloid-related imaging abnormalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信