里斯本男男性行为者队列中的联合HIV预防策略:2014年至2021年数据的纵向聚类分析

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rita Dias, Miguel Rocha, Luís Veríssimo, Fernando Ferreira, Maria João Novais, Milton Severo, Sílvia Fraga, Paula Meireles
{"title":"里斯本男男性行为者队列中的联合HIV预防策略:2014年至2021年数据的纵向聚类分析","authors":"Rita Dias, Miguel Rocha, Luís Veríssimo, Fernando Ferreira, Maria João Novais, Milton Severo, Sílvia Fraga, Paula Meireles","doi":"10.1007/s10461-025-04693-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to examine how HIV prevention tools were used and how they clustered together among men who have sex with men (MSM) testing at a community-based sexual health center in Lisbon, Portugal, from 2014 to 2021. We used data from 16,780 visits from adult cisgender MSM and had an HIV-negative test result at baseline in the Lisbon Cohort of MSM-an open, prospective cohort study conducted at CheckpointLX, a community-based sexual health center tailored to MSM, from 2014 to 2021. A longitudinal clustering approach was used to identify clusters of HIV prevention (cluster package for R). Six clusters of HIV prevention were identified: condom use (9,109 visits); low or no condom use, low PrEP (preexposure prophylaxis) use (6,258 visits); anal sex abstinence (746 visits); PEP (postexposure prophylaxis) and condom use (305 visits); PEP use (186 visits); and PrEP and condom use (176 visits). Most participants were aged 24 to 34 years old, were born in Portugal, had high education, and self-identified as gay. PrEP and PEP uptake were more associated with being born in Brazil, while low prevention adherence was less associated with high education. Condom use was the most frequently reported prevention strategy, followed by the low or no condom use, low PrEP use cluster. However, participants with higher odds of reporting HIV risk behaviors were the ones allocated to clusters with reports of higher frequency of prevention tools utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination HIV Prevention Strategies in the Lisbon Cohort of Men who Have Sex with Men: A Longitudinal Cluster Analysis of Data from 2014 to 2021.\",\"authors\":\"Rita Dias, Miguel Rocha, Luís Veríssimo, Fernando Ferreira, Maria João Novais, Milton Severo, Sílvia Fraga, Paula Meireles\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10461-025-04693-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aims to examine how HIV prevention tools were used and how they clustered together among men who have sex with men (MSM) testing at a community-based sexual health center in Lisbon, Portugal, from 2014 to 2021. We used data from 16,780 visits from adult cisgender MSM and had an HIV-negative test result at baseline in the Lisbon Cohort of MSM-an open, prospective cohort study conducted at CheckpointLX, a community-based sexual health center tailored to MSM, from 2014 to 2021. A longitudinal clustering approach was used to identify clusters of HIV prevention (cluster package for R). Six clusters of HIV prevention were identified: condom use (9,109 visits); low or no condom use, low PrEP (preexposure prophylaxis) use (6,258 visits); anal sex abstinence (746 visits); PEP (postexposure prophylaxis) and condom use (305 visits); PEP use (186 visits); and PrEP and condom use (176 visits). Most participants were aged 24 to 34 years old, were born in Portugal, had high education, and self-identified as gay. PrEP and PEP uptake were more associated with being born in Brazil, while low prevention adherence was less associated with high education. Condom use was the most frequently reported prevention strategy, followed by the low or no condom use, low PrEP use cluster. However, participants with higher odds of reporting HIV risk behaviors were the ones allocated to clusters with reports of higher frequency of prevention tools utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS and Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04693-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04693-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在研究2014年至2021年在葡萄牙里斯本社区性健康中心进行男男性行为(MSM)检测的男性中如何使用艾滋病毒预防工具以及这些工具如何聚集在一起。我们使用的数据来自16780名成年顺性男男性接触者的就诊数据,并在MSM里斯本队列的基线检测结果为hiv阴性-这是一项开放的前瞻性队列研究,于2014年至2021年在CheckpointLX进行,这是一家专门针对MSM的社区性健康中心。纵向聚类方法用于确定HIV预防的聚类(R的聚类包)。确定了六组艾滋病毒预防:避孕套使用(9109次访问);很少或没有使用安全套,很少使用暴露前预防(PrEP)(6258次就诊);肛交禁欲(746次);PEP(接触后预防)和使用安全套(305次就诊);PEP使用(186次访问);PrEP和避孕套的使用(176次访问)。大多数参与者年龄在24到34岁之间,出生在葡萄牙,受过高等教育,并自认为是同性恋。PrEP和PEP的摄入与巴西出生的人关系更大,而低预防依从性与高等教育的关系较小。使用避孕套是最常报告的预防策略,其次是低或不使用避孕套,低PrEP使用群集。然而,报告艾滋病毒风险行为的几率较高的参与者被分配到报告预防工具使用频率较高的分组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combination HIV Prevention Strategies in the Lisbon Cohort of Men who Have Sex with Men: A Longitudinal Cluster Analysis of Data from 2014 to 2021.

This study aims to examine how HIV prevention tools were used and how they clustered together among men who have sex with men (MSM) testing at a community-based sexual health center in Lisbon, Portugal, from 2014 to 2021. We used data from 16,780 visits from adult cisgender MSM and had an HIV-negative test result at baseline in the Lisbon Cohort of MSM-an open, prospective cohort study conducted at CheckpointLX, a community-based sexual health center tailored to MSM, from 2014 to 2021. A longitudinal clustering approach was used to identify clusters of HIV prevention (cluster package for R). Six clusters of HIV prevention were identified: condom use (9,109 visits); low or no condom use, low PrEP (preexposure prophylaxis) use (6,258 visits); anal sex abstinence (746 visits); PEP (postexposure prophylaxis) and condom use (305 visits); PEP use (186 visits); and PrEP and condom use (176 visits). Most participants were aged 24 to 34 years old, were born in Portugal, had high education, and self-identified as gay. PrEP and PEP uptake were more associated with being born in Brazil, while low prevention adherence was less associated with high education. Condom use was the most frequently reported prevention strategy, followed by the low or no condom use, low PrEP use cluster. However, participants with higher odds of reporting HIV risk behaviors were the ones allocated to clusters with reports of higher frequency of prevention tools utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信