确定住院后抗生素治疗高风险患者:改善抗菌药物管理措施的预测性评分

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infection Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-15 DOI:10.1007/s15010-025-02525-9
Moritz Beck, Carolin Koll, Uga Dumpis, Christian G Giske, Siri Göpel, Silje Bakken Jørgensen, Johanna Kessel, Lars Kaare Kleppe, Dorthea Hagen Oma, Noa Eliakim Raz, Makeda Semret, Gunnar Skov Simonsen, Maria J G T Vehreschild, Kerstin Albus, Lena M Biehl, Jörg J Vehreschild, Annika Y Classen
{"title":"确定住院后抗生素治疗高风险患者:改善抗菌药物管理措施的预测性评分","authors":"Moritz Beck, Carolin Koll, Uga Dumpis, Christian G Giske, Siri Göpel, Silje Bakken Jørgensen, Johanna Kessel, Lars Kaare Kleppe, Dorthea Hagen Oma, Noa Eliakim Raz, Makeda Semret, Gunnar Skov Simonsen, Maria J G T Vehreschild, Kerstin Albus, Lena M Biehl, Jörg J Vehreschild, Annika Y Classen","doi":"10.1007/s15010-025-02525-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Identifying patients for clinical studies evaluating strategies to reduce unnecessary antibiotic usage in hospitals is challenging. This study aimed to develop a predictive score to identify newly hospitalized patients with high likelihood of receiving antibiotics, thus improving patient inclusion in future studies focusing on antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis used data from the PILGRIM study (NCT03765528), which included 1,600 patients across ten international sites. Predictive variables for antibiotic treatment during hospitalization were computed, and an additive score model was developed using logistic regression and 10-fold cross-validation. The PILGRIM score was validated in an independent cohort (validation cohort), with performance metrics assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1,258 patients was included. In the development cohort 52.8% (n = 445) and in the validation cohort 42.4% (n = 134) of patients received antibiotics. Key predictors included hematologic malignancies, immunosuppressive medication, and past hospitalization. The logistic regression model demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.74 in the validation. The final additive score incorporated these predictors plus \"planned elective surgery\" achieving a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value of 78%, a sensitivity of 41%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 69%in validation set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PILGRIM score effectively identifies newly hospitalized patients likely to receive antibiotics, demonstrating high specificity and PPV. Its application can improve future AMS programs and trial recruitment by facilitating targeted inclusion of patients, especially in the hematological and oncological setting. Further -external and prospective- validation is needed to broaden the model's applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"1941-1952"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying patients at high risk for antibiotic treatment following hospital admission: a predictive score to improve antimicrobial stewardship measures.\",\"authors\":\"Moritz Beck, Carolin Koll, Uga Dumpis, Christian G Giske, Siri Göpel, Silje Bakken Jørgensen, Johanna Kessel, Lars Kaare Kleppe, Dorthea Hagen Oma, Noa Eliakim Raz, Makeda Semret, Gunnar Skov Simonsen, Maria J G T Vehreschild, Kerstin Albus, Lena M Biehl, Jörg J Vehreschild, Annika Y Classen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s15010-025-02525-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Identifying patients for clinical studies evaluating strategies to reduce unnecessary antibiotic usage in hospitals is challenging. This study aimed to develop a predictive score to identify newly hospitalized patients with high likelihood of receiving antibiotics, thus improving patient inclusion in future studies focusing on antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis used data from the PILGRIM study (NCT03765528), which included 1,600 patients across ten international sites. Predictive variables for antibiotic treatment during hospitalization were computed, and an additive score model was developed using logistic regression and 10-fold cross-validation. The PILGRIM score was validated in an independent cohort (validation cohort), with performance metrics assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1,258 patients was included. In the development cohort 52.8% (n = 445) and in the validation cohort 42.4% (n = 134) of patients received antibiotics. Key predictors included hematologic malignancies, immunosuppressive medication, and past hospitalization. The logistic regression model demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.74 in the validation. The final additive score incorporated these predictors plus \\\"planned elective surgery\\\" achieving a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value of 78%, a sensitivity of 41%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 69%in validation set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PILGRIM score effectively identifies newly hospitalized patients likely to receive antibiotics, demonstrating high specificity and PPV. Its application can improve future AMS programs and trial recruitment by facilitating targeted inclusion of patients, especially in the hematological and oncological setting. Further -external and prospective- validation is needed to broaden the model's applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1941-1952\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460503/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02525-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02525-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定临床研究的患者,评估减少医院不必要抗生素使用的策略是具有挑战性的。本研究旨在建立一个预测评分,以识别新住院的高可能接受抗生素的患者,从而提高患者纳入未来研究的重点是抗菌药物管理(AMS)计划。方法:本回顾性分析使用了PILGRIM研究(NCT03765528)的数据,该研究包括来自10个国际站点的1,600名患者。计算住院期间抗生素治疗的预测变量,并采用logistic回归和10倍交叉验证建立加性评分模型。PILGRIM评分在一个独立的队列(验证队列)中得到验证,并评估了性能指标。结果:纳入了1258例患者的数据。在发展队列中,52.8% (n = 445)和验证队列中,42.4% (n = 134)的患者接受了抗生素治疗。主要预测因素包括血液恶性肿瘤、免疫抑制药物和既往住院。logistic回归模型的验证曲线下面积为0.74。最终的加性评分将这些预测因素与“计划择期手术”结合起来,在验证集中,特异性为92%,阳性预测值为78%,敏感性为41%,阴性预测值(NPV)为69%。结论:PILGRIM评分能有效识别可能接受抗生素治疗的新住院患者,具有较高的特异性和PPV。它的应用可以通过促进有针对性的纳入患者,特别是血液和肿瘤患者,来改善未来的AMS项目和试验招募。需要进一步的外部和前瞻性验证来扩大模型的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying patients at high risk for antibiotic treatment following hospital admission: a predictive score to improve antimicrobial stewardship measures.

Purpose: Identifying patients for clinical studies evaluating strategies to reduce unnecessary antibiotic usage in hospitals is challenging. This study aimed to develop a predictive score to identify newly hospitalized patients with high likelihood of receiving antibiotics, thus improving patient inclusion in future studies focusing on antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs.

Methods: This retrospective analysis used data from the PILGRIM study (NCT03765528), which included 1,600 patients across ten international sites. Predictive variables for antibiotic treatment during hospitalization were computed, and an additive score model was developed using logistic regression and 10-fold cross-validation. The PILGRIM score was validated in an independent cohort (validation cohort), with performance metrics assessed.

Results: Data from 1,258 patients was included. In the development cohort 52.8% (n = 445) and in the validation cohort 42.4% (n = 134) of patients received antibiotics. Key predictors included hematologic malignancies, immunosuppressive medication, and past hospitalization. The logistic regression model demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.74 in the validation. The final additive score incorporated these predictors plus "planned elective surgery" achieving a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value of 78%, a sensitivity of 41%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 69%in validation set.

Conclusion: The PILGRIM score effectively identifies newly hospitalized patients likely to receive antibiotics, demonstrating high specificity and PPV. Its application can improve future AMS programs and trial recruitment by facilitating targeted inclusion of patients, especially in the hematological and oncological setting. Further -external and prospective- validation is needed to broaden the model's applicability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信