医疗复杂性儿童在线护理地图的共同创建和评估。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Sherri Adams, Madison Beatty, Blossom G Dharmaraj, Clara Moore, Arti D Desai, Leah Bartlett, Erin Culbert, Eyal Cohen, Jennifer N Stinson, Julia Orkin
{"title":"医疗复杂性儿童在线护理地图的共同创建和评估。","authors":"Sherri Adams, Madison Beatty, Blossom G Dharmaraj, Clara Moore, Arti D Desai, Leah Bartlett, Erin Culbert, Eyal Cohen, Jennifer N Stinson, Julia Orkin","doi":"10.1186/s12887-025-05679-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care maps are a caregiver-created diagrammatic tool to support the care of children with medical complexity (CMC). They provide a high-level overview of care, allowing the care team to appreciate the interrelatedness of medical and non-medical aspects of care. Limitations currently exist for the usability, shareability, and integration of care maps into clinical care as they are typically paper-based and caregiver-held. Therefore, the aims of the study were to (1) collaborate with caregivers and care team members (CTMs) of CMC to determine the design requirements and develop an online care map, (2) assess usability, and (3) explore its feasibility and utility from multiple perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed methods study utilized an exploratory sequential design. In Phase 1 (Design and Development), the design requirements and utility of an online care map were identified through semi-structured qualitative interviews with caregivers and CTMs. In Phase 2 (Usability Testing), caregivers were monitored for errors and efficiency while completing a standardized task on the online care map. In Phase 3 (Feasibility Testing), caregivers created, updated, and shared online care maps that were housed within a patient-facing online platform accessible to CTMs. Caregivers and CTMs reported their usage of the care map and a descriptive visual content analysis of the care maps was completed. Semi-structured interviews with caregivers and CTMs were conducted to explore the use and feasibility of the online care maps. Qualitative interviews were analyzed using inductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Phase 1, interviews were conducted with caregivers (n = 16) and CTMs (n = 16). Four themes related to the utility and design were identified: (1) simplified snapshot, (2) envisioned use, (3) caregiver hesitancy, and (4) design modifications. The online care map prototype was modified accordingly. In Phase 2, half of the caregivers (n = 5) made one or more navigation error while using the care map. Nearly all caregivers (n = 9) completed the care map task successfully. In Phase 3, thirty-six caregivers registered on the online platform, with 70% (n = 25) creating a care map. Four themes were generated from interviews with caregivers (n = 15) and CTMs (n = 13): (1) care maps in clinical care, (2) enhanced understanding of the bigger picture, (3) uncertain value and redundancy, and (4) innovations for greater impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An online care map creation tool was co-developed with caregivers and CTMs for CMC. Caregivers and CTMs appreciated online care maps as an organizational, coordination, and communication tool, providing an enhanced understanding of the complexity of care, a holistic view of the child, and guiding care discussions. Some caregivers did not use the care map due to a perceived lack of value or redundancy. Future research should explore the integration of care maps into electronic medical records and care pathways and evaluate the impact on clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"329"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-creation and evaluation of online care maps for children with medical complexity.\",\"authors\":\"Sherri Adams, Madison Beatty, Blossom G Dharmaraj, Clara Moore, Arti D Desai, Leah Bartlett, Erin Culbert, Eyal Cohen, Jennifer N Stinson, Julia Orkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12887-025-05679-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care maps are a caregiver-created diagrammatic tool to support the care of children with medical complexity (CMC). They provide a high-level overview of care, allowing the care team to appreciate the interrelatedness of medical and non-medical aspects of care. Limitations currently exist for the usability, shareability, and integration of care maps into clinical care as they are typically paper-based and caregiver-held. Therefore, the aims of the study were to (1) collaborate with caregivers and care team members (CTMs) of CMC to determine the design requirements and develop an online care map, (2) assess usability, and (3) explore its feasibility and utility from multiple perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed methods study utilized an exploratory sequential design. In Phase 1 (Design and Development), the design requirements and utility of an online care map were identified through semi-structured qualitative interviews with caregivers and CTMs. In Phase 2 (Usability Testing), caregivers were monitored for errors and efficiency while completing a standardized task on the online care map. In Phase 3 (Feasibility Testing), caregivers created, updated, and shared online care maps that were housed within a patient-facing online platform accessible to CTMs. Caregivers and CTMs reported their usage of the care map and a descriptive visual content analysis of the care maps was completed. Semi-structured interviews with caregivers and CTMs were conducted to explore the use and feasibility of the online care maps. Qualitative interviews were analyzed using inductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Phase 1, interviews were conducted with caregivers (n = 16) and CTMs (n = 16). Four themes related to the utility and design were identified: (1) simplified snapshot, (2) envisioned use, (3) caregiver hesitancy, and (4) design modifications. The online care map prototype was modified accordingly. In Phase 2, half of the caregivers (n = 5) made one or more navigation error while using the care map. Nearly all caregivers (n = 9) completed the care map task successfully. In Phase 3, thirty-six caregivers registered on the online platform, with 70% (n = 25) creating a care map. Four themes were generated from interviews with caregivers (n = 15) and CTMs (n = 13): (1) care maps in clinical care, (2) enhanced understanding of the bigger picture, (3) uncertain value and redundancy, and (4) innovations for greater impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An online care map creation tool was co-developed with caregivers and CTMs for CMC. Caregivers and CTMs appreciated online care maps as an organizational, coordination, and communication tool, providing an enhanced understanding of the complexity of care, a holistic view of the child, and guiding care discussions. Some caregivers did not use the care map due to a perceived lack of value or redundancy. Future research should explore the integration of care maps into electronic medical records and care pathways and evaluate the impact on clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032662/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05679-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05679-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护理地图是一种护理人员创建的图表工具,用于支持医疗复杂性(CMC)儿童的护理。它们提供了一个高层次的护理概述,使护理团队能够理解医疗和非医疗方面的相互关系。目前存在着可用性、可共享性和将护理地图整合到临床护理中的限制,因为它们通常是纸质的,并且由护理人员持有。因此,本研究的目的是:(1)与CMC的护理人员和护理团队成员(CTMs)合作,确定设计需求并开发在线护理地图;(2)评估可用性;(3)从多个角度探讨其可行性和实用性。方法:本研究采用探索性顺序设计。在第一阶段(设计和开发)中,通过对护理人员和ctm的半结构化定性访谈,确定了在线护理地图的设计要求和实用性。在第二阶段(可用性测试)中,在完成在线护理地图上的标准化任务时,对护理人员的错误和效率进行监测。在阶段3(可行性测试)中,护理人员创建、更新和共享在线护理地图,这些地图位于面向患者的在线平台中,可供ctm访问。护理人员和ctm报告了他们对护理地图的使用情况,并完成了对护理地图的描述性视觉内容分析。对护理人员和ctm进行了半结构化访谈,以探讨在线护理地图的使用和可行性。定性访谈采用归纳内容分析法进行分析。结果:在第一阶段,对护理人员(n = 16)和CTMs (n = 16)进行了访谈。确定了与实用程序和设计相关的四个主题:(1)简化快照,(2)设想使用,(3)护理人员犹豫,(4)设计修改。在线护理地图原型进行了相应的修改。在第二阶段,一半的护理人员(n = 5)在使用护理地图时犯了一个或多个导航错误。几乎所有的护理人员(n = 9)都成功完成了护理地图任务。在第三阶段,36名护理人员在在线平台上注册,其中70% (n = 25)创建了护理地图。从对护理人员(n = 15)和CTMs (n = 13)的访谈中产生了四个主题:(1)临床护理中的护理地图,(2)增强对大局的理解,(3)不确定价值和冗余,(4)创新以产生更大的影响。结论:与护理人员和中医共同开发了CMC在线护理地图制作工具。护理人员和ctm认为在线护理地图是一种组织、协调和沟通的工具,可以增强对护理复杂性的理解,对儿童的整体看法,并指导护理讨论。一些护理人员没有使用护理地图,因为他们认为缺乏价值或冗余。未来的研究应探索将护理地图整合到电子病历和护理路径中,并评估对临床结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-creation and evaluation of online care maps for children with medical complexity.

Background: Care maps are a caregiver-created diagrammatic tool to support the care of children with medical complexity (CMC). They provide a high-level overview of care, allowing the care team to appreciate the interrelatedness of medical and non-medical aspects of care. Limitations currently exist for the usability, shareability, and integration of care maps into clinical care as they are typically paper-based and caregiver-held. Therefore, the aims of the study were to (1) collaborate with caregivers and care team members (CTMs) of CMC to determine the design requirements and develop an online care map, (2) assess usability, and (3) explore its feasibility and utility from multiple perspectives.

Methods: This mixed methods study utilized an exploratory sequential design. In Phase 1 (Design and Development), the design requirements and utility of an online care map were identified through semi-structured qualitative interviews with caregivers and CTMs. In Phase 2 (Usability Testing), caregivers were monitored for errors and efficiency while completing a standardized task on the online care map. In Phase 3 (Feasibility Testing), caregivers created, updated, and shared online care maps that were housed within a patient-facing online platform accessible to CTMs. Caregivers and CTMs reported their usage of the care map and a descriptive visual content analysis of the care maps was completed. Semi-structured interviews with caregivers and CTMs were conducted to explore the use and feasibility of the online care maps. Qualitative interviews were analyzed using inductive content analysis.

Results: In Phase 1, interviews were conducted with caregivers (n = 16) and CTMs (n = 16). Four themes related to the utility and design were identified: (1) simplified snapshot, (2) envisioned use, (3) caregiver hesitancy, and (4) design modifications. The online care map prototype was modified accordingly. In Phase 2, half of the caregivers (n = 5) made one or more navigation error while using the care map. Nearly all caregivers (n = 9) completed the care map task successfully. In Phase 3, thirty-six caregivers registered on the online platform, with 70% (n = 25) creating a care map. Four themes were generated from interviews with caregivers (n = 15) and CTMs (n = 13): (1) care maps in clinical care, (2) enhanced understanding of the bigger picture, (3) uncertain value and redundancy, and (4) innovations for greater impact.

Conclusion: An online care map creation tool was co-developed with caregivers and CTMs for CMC. Caregivers and CTMs appreciated online care maps as an organizational, coordination, and communication tool, providing an enhanced understanding of the complexity of care, a holistic view of the child, and guiding care discussions. Some caregivers did not use the care map due to a perceived lack of value or redundancy. Future research should explore the integration of care maps into electronic medical records and care pathways and evaluate the impact on clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信