肩关节镜术后肩关节手术后肩胛间肌丛阻滞的静脉注射右美托咪定加地塞米松辅助镇痛:一项随机、双盲、单中心试验

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-13 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002196
Hervé Vanden Eede, Sophie Noels, Marco Vreven, Jo Dujardyn, Martin Vanden Eede, Jordi Branders, Lise Vanden Eede, Gilles De Herdt, Isabelle Noels, Jason Bouziotis, Vera Saldien
{"title":"肩关节镜术后肩关节手术后肩胛间肌丛阻滞的静脉注射右美托咪定加地塞米松辅助镇痛:一项随机、双盲、单中心试验","authors":"Hervé Vanden Eede, Sophie Noels, Marco Vreven, Jo Dujardyn, Martin Vanden Eede, Jordi Branders, Lise Vanden Eede, Gilles De Herdt, Isabelle Noels, Jason Bouziotis, Vera Saldien","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The co-administration of intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine is reported to prolong the duration of analgesia after single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block. The most effective dose with minimal side effects remains undetermined.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the difference in time to first analgesic request in patients receiving different doses of intravenous dexmedetomidine after an interscalene brachial plexus block undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A double-blind, randomised controlled study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single-centre study from November 2021 to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Two hundred and eighteen patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups using blocked randomisation: intravenous 0.9% saline (group 1) or intravenous dexmedetomidine: 1.0 (group 2), 1.5 (group 3) and 2.0 (group 4) μg kg -1 .</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the time to first analgesic request in hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the time to first analgesic request: group 1 (18.8 ± 6.3 h), group 2 (18.7 ± 5.1 h), group 3 (17.7 ± 5.6 h) and group 4 (19.5 ± 5.0 h). There was no significant difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction and quality of sleep in the first 24 h. There were significant differences in the incidences of intra-operative hypotension and bradycardia between the control group and all the dexmedetomidine groups combined; however, this study was not powered for this analysis. The time to extubation was statistically significantly higher in group 4 with a prolonged time to extubation (>14 min) when the duration of surgery was shorter (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Administering high doses of intravenous dexmedetomidine may not yield additional analgesic benefits after single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block while potentially increasing haemodynamic risks and prolonging time to extubation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>EudraCT 2021-004686-12.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"808-816"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous dexmedetomidine as addition to dexamethasone for interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomised, double-blinded, single centre trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hervé Vanden Eede, Sophie Noels, Marco Vreven, Jo Dujardyn, Martin Vanden Eede, Jordi Branders, Lise Vanden Eede, Gilles De Herdt, Isabelle Noels, Jason Bouziotis, Vera Saldien\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The co-administration of intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine is reported to prolong the duration of analgesia after single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block. The most effective dose with minimal side effects remains undetermined.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the difference in time to first analgesic request in patients receiving different doses of intravenous dexmedetomidine after an interscalene brachial plexus block undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A double-blind, randomised controlled study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single-centre study from November 2021 to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Two hundred and eighteen patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups using blocked randomisation: intravenous 0.9% saline (group 1) or intravenous dexmedetomidine: 1.0 (group 2), 1.5 (group 3) and 2.0 (group 4) μg kg -1 .</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the time to first analgesic request in hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the time to first analgesic request: group 1 (18.8 ± 6.3 h), group 2 (18.7 ± 5.1 h), group 3 (17.7 ± 5.6 h) and group 4 (19.5 ± 5.0 h). There was no significant difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction and quality of sleep in the first 24 h. There were significant differences in the incidences of intra-operative hypotension and bradycardia between the control group and all the dexmedetomidine groups combined; however, this study was not powered for this analysis. The time to extubation was statistically significantly higher in group 4 with a prolonged time to extubation (>14 min) when the duration of surgery was shorter (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Administering high doses of intravenous dexmedetomidine may not yield additional analgesic benefits after single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block while potentially increasing haemodynamic risks and prolonging time to extubation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>EudraCT 2021-004686-12.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"808-816\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002196\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据报道,静脉注射地塞米松和右美托咪定可延长单次斜角肌间臂丛阻滞后的镇痛时间。副作用最小的最有效剂量仍未确定。目的:评价关节镜肩关节手术斜角间臂丛阻滞术后接受不同剂量右美托咪定静脉注射的患者首次镇痛时间的差异。设计:双盲、随机对照研究。环境:2021年11月至2023年12月的单中心研究。患者:纳入218例接受肩关节镜手术的患者。干预措施:采用阻断随机化方法将患者随机分为四组:静脉注射0.9%生理盐水(第一组)或静脉注射右美托咪定:1.0(第二组)、1.5(第三组)和2.0(第四组)μ kg-1。主要观察指标:主要观察指标为第一次要求镇痛的时间(以小时为单位)。结果:组1(18.8±6.3 h)、组2(18.7±5.1 h)、组3(17.7±5.6 h)、组4(19.5±5.0 h)至首次请求镇痛时间差异无统计学意义。两组术后24 h内恶心呕吐、患者满意度及睡眠质量无显著差异。对照组与各右美托咪定联合用药组术中低血压、心动过缓发生率比较,差异均有统计学意义;然而,这项研究并没有为这项分析提供动力。时间拔管组在统计学上显著高于4长时间拔管(> 14分钟)时,手术时间短(或0.98,95%可信区间0.96到0.99)。结论:单次斜角肌间臂丛阻滞后给予高剂量静脉右美托咪定可能不会产生额外的镇痛效果,但可能增加血流动力学风险并延长拔管时间。试验注册:edract 2021-004686-12。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intravenous dexmedetomidine as addition to dexamethasone for interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomised, double-blinded, single centre trial.

Background: The co-administration of intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine is reported to prolong the duration of analgesia after single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block. The most effective dose with minimal side effects remains undetermined.

Objectives: To evaluate the difference in time to first analgesic request in patients receiving different doses of intravenous dexmedetomidine after an interscalene brachial plexus block undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Design: A double-blind, randomised controlled study.

Setting: A single-centre study from November 2021 to December 2023.

Patients: Two hundred and eighteen patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery were included.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups using blocked randomisation: intravenous 0.9% saline (group 1) or intravenous dexmedetomidine: 1.0 (group 2), 1.5 (group 3) and 2.0 (group 4) μg kg -1 .

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the time to first analgesic request in hours.

Results: There was no significant difference in the time to first analgesic request: group 1 (18.8 ± 6.3 h), group 2 (18.7 ± 5.1 h), group 3 (17.7 ± 5.6 h) and group 4 (19.5 ± 5.0 h). There was no significant difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction and quality of sleep in the first 24 h. There were significant differences in the incidences of intra-operative hypotension and bradycardia between the control group and all the dexmedetomidine groups combined; however, this study was not powered for this analysis. The time to extubation was statistically significantly higher in group 4 with a prolonged time to extubation (>14 min) when the duration of surgery was shorter (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.99).

Conclusions: Administering high doses of intravenous dexmedetomidine may not yield additional analgesic benefits after single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block while potentially increasing haemodynamic risks and prolonging time to extubation.

Trial registration: EudraCT 2021-004686-12.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信