{"title":"一种新的甲状腺肿瘤风险分层评分系统。","authors":"Ya Yuan, Hua Shu, Lu Li, Liuxi Wu, Fei Yu","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01633-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop an ultrasound feature-based risk stratification system for differentiating benign, low-risk and malignant thyroid tumors and compare it with existing TI-RADS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study included patients who underwent preoperative neck ultrasound examination from January 2018 to June 2023, and their ultrasound characteristics were recorded. According to surgical pathological findings, they were classified into three categories: benign, low-risk, and malignant. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association of qualitative ultrasound features with different risk stratifications and a new scoring system was established to evaluate its diagnostic efficacy, and to compare it with TI-RADS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aspect ratio ≥1 was an independent risk factor in the comparison of benign and low-risk thyroid nodules, and in the comparison of benign and malignant nodules, hypoechoic,irregular margin,nodule max diameter ≤1 cm,the aspect ratio ≥1 and elasticity score ≥3 were independent risk factors. According to the multivariate analysis, they were assigned 1, 2, 2, 3, 2/4 points respectively, and we established a new scoring system. According to ROC analysis, the total score of 0-4.5 was considered as benign nodules, 4.5-5.5 was considered as low-risk nodules, and more than 5.5 were considered as malignant nodules. Compared it to ACR-TI-RADS, this scoring system performed better than in differentiating benign and malignant nodules (P = 0.001, P = 0.018, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The scoring system based on ultrasound features established in this study can be used for risk stratification of thyroid nodules more efficiently, it has higher sensitivity and specificity for the differentiation of benign and malignant nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new scoring system for risk stratification of thyroid tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Ya Yuan, Hua Shu, Lu Li, Liuxi Wu, Fei Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12880-025-01633-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop an ultrasound feature-based risk stratification system for differentiating benign, low-risk and malignant thyroid tumors and compare it with existing TI-RADS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study included patients who underwent preoperative neck ultrasound examination from January 2018 to June 2023, and their ultrasound characteristics were recorded. According to surgical pathological findings, they were classified into three categories: benign, low-risk, and malignant. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association of qualitative ultrasound features with different risk stratifications and a new scoring system was established to evaluate its diagnostic efficacy, and to compare it with TI-RADS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aspect ratio ≥1 was an independent risk factor in the comparison of benign and low-risk thyroid nodules, and in the comparison of benign and malignant nodules, hypoechoic,irregular margin,nodule max diameter ≤1 cm,the aspect ratio ≥1 and elasticity score ≥3 were independent risk factors. According to the multivariate analysis, they were assigned 1, 2, 2, 3, 2/4 points respectively, and we established a new scoring system. According to ROC analysis, the total score of 0-4.5 was considered as benign nodules, 4.5-5.5 was considered as low-risk nodules, and more than 5.5 were considered as malignant nodules. Compared it to ACR-TI-RADS, this scoring system performed better than in differentiating benign and malignant nodules (P = 0.001, P = 0.018, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The scoring system based on ultrasound features established in this study can be used for risk stratification of thyroid nodules more efficiently, it has higher sensitivity and specificity for the differentiation of benign and malignant nodules.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983903/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01633-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01633-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:建立基于超声特征的甲状腺良、低、恶性肿瘤风险分层系统,并与现有的TI-RADS进行比较。方法:回顾性研究2018年1月至2023年6月行术前颈部超声检查的患者,记录其超声特征。根据手术病理表现,将其分为良性、低危、恶性三大类。采用单变量和多变量logistic回归分析评估定性超声特征与不同危险分层的相关性,建立新的评分系统评价其诊断效果,并与TI-RADS进行比较。结果:纵横比≥1是甲状腺良、低危结节比较的独立危险因素,良、恶性结节比较中,低回声、边缘不规则、结节最大直径≤1 cm、纵横比≥1、弹性评分≥3为独立危险因素。根据多变量分析,分别给予1、2、2、3、2/4分,并建立新的评分体系。根据ROC分析,总分0-4.5分为良性结节,4.5-5.5分为低危结节,超过5.5分为恶性结节。与ACR-TI-RADS比较,该评分系统在良恶性结节的鉴别上优于ACR-TI-RADS (P = 0.001, P = 0.018)。结论:本研究建立的基于超声特征的评分系统可更有效地用于甲状腺结节的风险分层,对良恶性结节的鉴别具有较高的敏感性和特异性。
A new scoring system for risk stratification of thyroid tumors.
Objectives: To develop an ultrasound feature-based risk stratification system for differentiating benign, low-risk and malignant thyroid tumors and compare it with existing TI-RADS.
Methods: The retrospective study included patients who underwent preoperative neck ultrasound examination from January 2018 to June 2023, and their ultrasound characteristics were recorded. According to surgical pathological findings, they were classified into three categories: benign, low-risk, and malignant. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association of qualitative ultrasound features with different risk stratifications and a new scoring system was established to evaluate its diagnostic efficacy, and to compare it with TI-RADS.
Results: Aspect ratio ≥1 was an independent risk factor in the comparison of benign and low-risk thyroid nodules, and in the comparison of benign and malignant nodules, hypoechoic,irregular margin,nodule max diameter ≤1 cm,the aspect ratio ≥1 and elasticity score ≥3 were independent risk factors. According to the multivariate analysis, they were assigned 1, 2, 2, 3, 2/4 points respectively, and we established a new scoring system. According to ROC analysis, the total score of 0-4.5 was considered as benign nodules, 4.5-5.5 was considered as low-risk nodules, and more than 5.5 were considered as malignant nodules. Compared it to ACR-TI-RADS, this scoring system performed better than in differentiating benign and malignant nodules (P = 0.001, P = 0.018, respectively).
Conclusion: The scoring system based on ultrasound features established in this study can be used for risk stratification of thyroid nodules more efficiently, it has higher sensitivity and specificity for the differentiation of benign and malignant nodules.
期刊介绍:
BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.