动脉内溶栓与机械取栓的疗效比较:文献综述。

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000003139
Bisrat Abate Bekele, Olivier Uwishema, Abel Haileyesus Adam, Abdi Degefu Gashu, Charbel Kachouh, Sarah Mshaymesh, Jack Wellington
{"title":"动脉内溶栓与机械取栓的疗效比较:文献综述。","authors":"Bisrat Abate Bekele, Olivier Uwishema, Abel Haileyesus Adam, Abdi Degefu Gashu, Charbel Kachouh, Sarah Mshaymesh, Jack Wellington","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000003139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Time is the single most critical factor in the management of patients presenting with AIS, where re-opening of occluded blood vessels is paramount. Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are two such therapies employed to reestablish cerebrovascular blood flow in patients with AIS. This review compares both IAT and MT according to their efficacy, safety profiles, recanalization rates, clinical outcomes, and adverse procedural events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study abstraction from electronic search databases comprising PubMed/MEDLINE, ResearchGate, and the National Library of Medicine was used. Screening and selection of relevant articles were comprehensively conducted for this review. Direct comparisons between IAT and MT in terms of variables including recanalization rates, clinical outcomes, and adverse procedural events were warranted for study inclusion. Research determined to exhibit insufficient data or without comparable groups were subsequently excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MT was prompter when executing procedures than IAT, achieving greater rates of recanalization. Both interventions displayed similar results regarding rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Despite current available data indicating MT to demonstrate more efficiency as a procedure, further research is needed to examine IAT in light of specific patient demographics, clinical presentation, and circumstances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review elucidated that MT often takes less time peri-procedurally, achieving greater success in revascularization compared with that of IAT. Regarding mortality and sICH rates, IAT and MT comparison showed equivocal results. Thus, while making therapeutic decisions, it is important to consider the unique clinical features of each patient as well as the timing of interventions in order to maximize treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"87 5","pages":"2749-2757"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12055068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis vs. mechanical thrombectomy: a literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Bisrat Abate Bekele, Olivier Uwishema, Abel Haileyesus Adam, Abdi Degefu Gashu, Charbel Kachouh, Sarah Mshaymesh, Jack Wellington\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MS9.0000000000003139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Time is the single most critical factor in the management of patients presenting with AIS, where re-opening of occluded blood vessels is paramount. Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are two such therapies employed to reestablish cerebrovascular blood flow in patients with AIS. This review compares both IAT and MT according to their efficacy, safety profiles, recanalization rates, clinical outcomes, and adverse procedural events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study abstraction from electronic search databases comprising PubMed/MEDLINE, ResearchGate, and the National Library of Medicine was used. Screening and selection of relevant articles were comprehensively conducted for this review. Direct comparisons between IAT and MT in terms of variables including recanalization rates, clinical outcomes, and adverse procedural events were warranted for study inclusion. Research determined to exhibit insufficient data or without comparable groups were subsequently excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MT was prompter when executing procedures than IAT, achieving greater rates of recanalization. Both interventions displayed similar results regarding rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Despite current available data indicating MT to demonstrate more efficiency as a procedure, further research is needed to examine IAT in light of specific patient demographics, clinical presentation, and circumstances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review elucidated that MT often takes less time peri-procedurally, achieving greater success in revascularization compared with that of IAT. Regarding mortality and sICH rates, IAT and MT comparison showed equivocal results. Thus, while making therapeutic decisions, it is important to consider the unique clinical features of each patient as well as the timing of interventions in order to maximize treatment outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"87 5\",\"pages\":\"2749-2757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12055068/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性缺血性卒中(AIS)仍然是世界范围内发病率和死亡率的主要原因之一。在AIS患者的治疗中,时间是唯一最关键的因素,其中重新开放闭塞的血管是至关重要的。动脉内溶栓(IAT)和机械取栓(MT)是两种用于重建AIS患者脑血管血流的治疗方法。这篇综述比较了IAT和MT的疗效、安全性、再通率、临床结果和不良程序事件。方法:采用PubMed/MEDLINE、ResearchGate、美国国家医学图书馆等电子检索数据库的研究摘要。本文对相关文献进行了全面的筛选和选择。直接比较IAT和MT之间的变量,包括再通率、临床结果和不良程序事件,是纳入研究的必要条件。研究确定显示数据不足或没有可比组随后被排除。结果:MT在执行手术时比IAT提示,实现更高的再通率。两种干预措施在症状性颅内出血(sICH)和死亡率方面显示出相似的结果。尽管目前可用的数据表明MT作为一种手术更有效,但还需要进一步的研究来根据特定的患者人口统计、临床表现和情况来检查IAT。结论:本综述表明,与IAT相比,MT术围手术期所需时间更短,血运重建成功率更高。关于死亡率和siich率,IAT和MT比较显示模棱两可的结果。因此,在做出治疗决定时,重要的是要考虑每个患者的独特临床特征以及干预的时机,以最大限度地提高治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis vs. mechanical thrombectomy: a literature review.

Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Time is the single most critical factor in the management of patients presenting with AIS, where re-opening of occluded blood vessels is paramount. Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are two such therapies employed to reestablish cerebrovascular blood flow in patients with AIS. This review compares both IAT and MT according to their efficacy, safety profiles, recanalization rates, clinical outcomes, and adverse procedural events.

Methods: Study abstraction from electronic search databases comprising PubMed/MEDLINE, ResearchGate, and the National Library of Medicine was used. Screening and selection of relevant articles were comprehensively conducted for this review. Direct comparisons between IAT and MT in terms of variables including recanalization rates, clinical outcomes, and adverse procedural events were warranted for study inclusion. Research determined to exhibit insufficient data or without comparable groups were subsequently excluded.

Results: MT was prompter when executing procedures than IAT, achieving greater rates of recanalization. Both interventions displayed similar results regarding rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Despite current available data indicating MT to demonstrate more efficiency as a procedure, further research is needed to examine IAT in light of specific patient demographics, clinical presentation, and circumstances.

Conclusion: This review elucidated that MT often takes less time peri-procedurally, achieving greater success in revascularization compared with that of IAT. Regarding mortality and sICH rates, IAT and MT comparison showed equivocal results. Thus, while making therapeutic decisions, it is important to consider the unique clinical features of each patient as well as the timing of interventions in order to maximize treatment outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信