证据权重法评价金缕提取物及其主要成分小檗碱的人体遗传毒性风险。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Bin Sun, Ashley Allemang, Stefan Pfuhler
{"title":"证据权重法评价金缕提取物及其主要成分小檗碱的人体遗传毒性风险。","authors":"Bin Sun,&nbsp;Ashley Allemang,&nbsp;Stefan Pfuhler","doi":"10.1016/j.fct.2025.115485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The genotoxicity potential of Chinese Goldthread Extract (CGPE) was initially explored using the Ames test and <em>in vitro</em> micronucleus assay. CGPE induced gene mutations in the Ames test and micronuclei in TK6 human lymphoblastoid cells, and berberine, present in CGPE above 20 %, was identified as the causative phytoconstituent. We confirmed berberine's ability to bind to, and interfere with, human topoisomerase II and bacterial DNA gyrase, enzymes that play a key role in maintaining DNA integrity and conclude that this likely explains the genotoxic effects we observed in the above-mentioned <em>in vitro</em> genotoxicity assays and in an HPRT assay using L5178Y cells. No micronuclei were induced in primary human blood lymphocytes, and <em>in vitro</em> effects were negated when external metabolic activation was included. These factors support a lack of relevance of the positive <em>in vitro</em> findings for human risk assessment. This assumption is further strengthened by comparing human pharmacokinetic Cmax blood levels with <em>in vitro</em> concentrations of berberine that trigger impairment of topo II, a known secondary genotoxicity pathway, revealing a large Margin of Exposure of ≥11900-fold. The overall Weight of Evidence supports the absence of a genotoxicity concern at typical use levels in commercial CGPE and berberine supplements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":317,"journal":{"name":"Food and Chemical Toxicology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 115485"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A weight of evidence approach to assess the human genotoxicity risk of Chinese goldthread botanical extract and its primary constituent berberine\",\"authors\":\"Bin Sun,&nbsp;Ashley Allemang,&nbsp;Stefan Pfuhler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fct.2025.115485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The genotoxicity potential of Chinese Goldthread Extract (CGPE) was initially explored using the Ames test and <em>in vitro</em> micronucleus assay. CGPE induced gene mutations in the Ames test and micronuclei in TK6 human lymphoblastoid cells, and berberine, present in CGPE above 20 %, was identified as the causative phytoconstituent. We confirmed berberine's ability to bind to, and interfere with, human topoisomerase II and bacterial DNA gyrase, enzymes that play a key role in maintaining DNA integrity and conclude that this likely explains the genotoxic effects we observed in the above-mentioned <em>in vitro</em> genotoxicity assays and in an HPRT assay using L5178Y cells. No micronuclei were induced in primary human blood lymphocytes, and <em>in vitro</em> effects were negated when external metabolic activation was included. These factors support a lack of relevance of the positive <em>in vitro</em> findings for human risk assessment. This assumption is further strengthened by comparing human pharmacokinetic Cmax blood levels with <em>in vitro</em> concentrations of berberine that trigger impairment of topo II, a known secondary genotoxicity pathway, revealing a large Margin of Exposure of ≥11900-fold. The overall Weight of Evidence supports the absence of a genotoxicity concern at typical use levels in commercial CGPE and berberine supplements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Chemical Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Chemical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691525002534\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Chemical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691525002534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用Ames试验和体外微核试验初步探讨了中金提取物(CGPE)的遗传毒性。cpe诱导TK6人淋巴母细胞样细胞Ames试验和微核基因突变,cpe中存在20%以上的小檗碱为致病植物成分。我们证实了小檗碱结合并干扰人类拓扑异构酶II和细菌DNA旋切酶的能力,这些酶在维持DNA完整性方面起着关键作用,并得出结论,这可能解释了我们在上述体外遗传毒性试验和使用L5178Y细胞的HPRT试验中观察到的遗传毒性作用。在人原代血液淋巴细胞中未诱导微核,在体外代谢激活的情况下,其体外效应被否定。这些因素支持体外阳性结果与人类风险评估缺乏相关性。通过比较人血药代动力学Cmax水平和体外小檗碱浓度,这一假设得到了进一步的证实,小檗碱浓度可引发topo II损伤,topo II是一种已知的继发遗传毒性途径,暴露幅度≥11900倍。证据的总体权重支持在商业cpe和小檗碱补充剂的典型使用水平下不存在遗传毒性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A weight of evidence approach to assess the human genotoxicity risk of Chinese goldthread botanical extract and its primary constituent berberine
The genotoxicity potential of Chinese Goldthread Extract (CGPE) was initially explored using the Ames test and in vitro micronucleus assay. CGPE induced gene mutations in the Ames test and micronuclei in TK6 human lymphoblastoid cells, and berberine, present in CGPE above 20 %, was identified as the causative phytoconstituent. We confirmed berberine's ability to bind to, and interfere with, human topoisomerase II and bacterial DNA gyrase, enzymes that play a key role in maintaining DNA integrity and conclude that this likely explains the genotoxic effects we observed in the above-mentioned in vitro genotoxicity assays and in an HPRT assay using L5178Y cells. No micronuclei were induced in primary human blood lymphocytes, and in vitro effects were negated when external metabolic activation was included. These factors support a lack of relevance of the positive in vitro findings for human risk assessment. This assumption is further strengthened by comparing human pharmacokinetic Cmax blood levels with in vitro concentrations of berberine that trigger impairment of topo II, a known secondary genotoxicity pathway, revealing a large Margin of Exposure of ≥11900-fold. The overall Weight of Evidence supports the absence of a genotoxicity concern at typical use levels in commercial CGPE and berberine supplements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Food and Chemical Toxicology 工程技术-毒理学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
4.70%
发文量
651
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT), an internationally renowned journal, that publishes original research articles and reviews on toxic effects, in animals and humans, of natural or synthetic chemicals occurring in the human environment with particular emphasis on food, drugs, and chemicals, including agricultural and industrial safety, and consumer product safety. Areas such as safety evaluation of novel foods and ingredients, biotechnologically-derived products, and nanomaterials are included in the scope of the journal. FCT also encourages submission of papers on inter-relationships between nutrition and toxicology and on in vitro techniques, particularly those fostering the 3 Rs. The principal aim of the journal is to publish high impact, scholarly work and to serve as a multidisciplinary forum for research in toxicology. Papers submitted will be judged on the basis of scientific originality and contribution to the field, quality and subject matter. Studies should address at least one of the following: -Adverse physiological/biochemical, or pathological changes induced by specific defined substances -New techniques for assessing potential toxicity, including molecular biology -Mechanisms underlying toxic phenomena -Toxicological examinations of specific chemicals or consumer products, both those showing adverse effects and those demonstrating safety, that meet current standards of scientific acceptability. Authors must clearly and briefly identify what novel toxic effect (s) or toxic mechanism (s) of the chemical are being reported and what their significance is in the abstract. Furthermore, sufficient doses should be included in order to provide information on NOAEL/LOAEL values.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信