慢性鼻窦炎内窥镜鼻窦手术后口服皮质类固醇的使用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1177/19458924251335075
Justina Shafik, Kara Sangiuolo, Eden Sheinin, Juan Lin, Meryl B Kravitz, Elizabeth A Borowiec, Christina H Fang
{"title":"慢性鼻窦炎内窥镜鼻窦手术后口服皮质类固醇的使用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Justina Shafik, Kara Sangiuolo, Eden Sheinin, Juan Lin, Meryl B Kravitz, Elizabeth A Borowiec, Christina H Fang","doi":"10.1177/19458924251335075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPatients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refractory to medical management often require endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Oral corticosteroids (OCSs) are frequently prescribed postoperatively, but the evidence of their efficacy is limited.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of OCS use in patients with CRS following ESS.MethodsA systematic search was performed to identify studies examining the use of OCSs in patients undergoing ESS for CRS. The primary outcomes were sinonasal outcome test (SNOT) and Lund-Kennedy (LK) endoscopic scores. Secondary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Meta-analysis was conducted using a fixed effects model with a heterogeneity test via the I2 statistic.ResultsThe search yielded 1899 articles, and 22 were included in the qualitative analysis, 14 of which were randomized controlled trials with 793 total patients. OCS use differed based on type, dosage, and duration. Studies included in meta-analysis did not show a significant difference in SNOT (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] -0.03, Confidence Interval [CI] -0.47-0.40, I2 0%), LK (SMD -0.20 CI -0.57-0.17 I2 58%), or VAS (SMD 0.19 CI -0.25-0.63 I2 54%) scores between steroid and non-steroid groups. Two studies that assessed OCSs in the allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) subtype of CRS showed significant improvement in outcomes. Two additional studies examined OCS versus itraconazole in AFRS, with both groups showing improvement but neither one with greater significance.ConclusionThis study showed no significant difference in SNOT, LK, or VAS scores in patients with CRS who received OCSs following ESS. Given the limited number of studies in the analysis, further investigations are warranted before making recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":" ","pages":"322-332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Oral Corticosteroid Use Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Justina Shafik, Kara Sangiuolo, Eden Sheinin, Juan Lin, Meryl B Kravitz, Elizabeth A Borowiec, Christina H Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19458924251335075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundPatients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refractory to medical management often require endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Oral corticosteroids (OCSs) are frequently prescribed postoperatively, but the evidence of their efficacy is limited.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of OCS use in patients with CRS following ESS.MethodsA systematic search was performed to identify studies examining the use of OCSs in patients undergoing ESS for CRS. The primary outcomes were sinonasal outcome test (SNOT) and Lund-Kennedy (LK) endoscopic scores. Secondary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Meta-analysis was conducted using a fixed effects model with a heterogeneity test via the I2 statistic.ResultsThe search yielded 1899 articles, and 22 were included in the qualitative analysis, 14 of which were randomized controlled trials with 793 total patients. OCS use differed based on type, dosage, and duration. Studies included in meta-analysis did not show a significant difference in SNOT (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] -0.03, Confidence Interval [CI] -0.47-0.40, I2 0%), LK (SMD -0.20 CI -0.57-0.17 I2 58%), or VAS (SMD 0.19 CI -0.25-0.63 I2 54%) scores between steroid and non-steroid groups. Two studies that assessed OCSs in the allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) subtype of CRS showed significant improvement in outcomes. Two additional studies examined OCS versus itraconazole in AFRS, with both groups showing improvement but neither one with greater significance.ConclusionThis study showed no significant difference in SNOT, LK, or VAS scores in patients with CRS who received OCSs following ESS. Given the limited number of studies in the analysis, further investigations are warranted before making recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"322-332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251335075\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251335075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)难治性患者通常需要内窥镜鼻窦手术(ESS)。口服皮质类固醇(OCSs)是常用的术后处方,但其疗效的证据有限。目的评价OCS在ESS后CRS患者中的应用效果。方法进行系统检索,以确定在接受ESS治疗的CRS患者中使用OCSs的研究。主要结果为鼻窦结局测试(SNOT)和隆德-肯尼迪(LK)内窥镜评分。次要结果为视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。meta分析采用固定效应模型,通过I2统计量进行异质性检验。结果共检索到1899篇文献,22篇纳入定性分析,其中14篇为随机对照试验,共纳入793例患者。OCS的使用根据类型、剂量和持续时间而有所不同。纳入meta分析的研究未显示类固醇组和非类固醇组在SNOT(标准化平均差[SMD] -0.03,置信区间[CI] -0.47-0.40, I2 0%)、LK (SMD -0.20 CI -0.57-0.17 I2 58%)或VAS (SMD 0.19 CI -0.25-0.63 I2 54%)评分方面存在显著差异。两项评估CRS变应性真菌性鼻窦炎(AFRS)亚型OCSs的研究显示,结果有显著改善。另外两项研究考察了OCS与伊曲康唑对AFRS的治疗效果,两组均有改善,但均无显著性差异。结论本研究显示,在ESS后接受OCSs的CRS患者的SNOT、LK或VAS评分无显著差异。鉴于分析中的研究数量有限,在提出建议之前有必要进行进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative Oral Corticosteroid Use Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BackgroundPatients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refractory to medical management often require endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Oral corticosteroids (OCSs) are frequently prescribed postoperatively, but the evidence of their efficacy is limited.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of OCS use in patients with CRS following ESS.MethodsA systematic search was performed to identify studies examining the use of OCSs in patients undergoing ESS for CRS. The primary outcomes were sinonasal outcome test (SNOT) and Lund-Kennedy (LK) endoscopic scores. Secondary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Meta-analysis was conducted using a fixed effects model with a heterogeneity test via the I2 statistic.ResultsThe search yielded 1899 articles, and 22 were included in the qualitative analysis, 14 of which were randomized controlled trials with 793 total patients. OCS use differed based on type, dosage, and duration. Studies included in meta-analysis did not show a significant difference in SNOT (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] -0.03, Confidence Interval [CI] -0.47-0.40, I2 0%), LK (SMD -0.20 CI -0.57-0.17 I2 58%), or VAS (SMD 0.19 CI -0.25-0.63 I2 54%) scores between steroid and non-steroid groups. Two studies that assessed OCSs in the allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) subtype of CRS showed significant improvement in outcomes. Two additional studies examined OCS versus itraconazole in AFRS, with both groups showing improvement but neither one with greater significance.ConclusionThis study showed no significant difference in SNOT, LK, or VAS scores in patients with CRS who received OCSs following ESS. Given the limited number of studies in the analysis, further investigations are warranted before making recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信