乳房切除术后平坦闭合:一种混合方法分析患者的结果和观点。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17288-8
Daniel Soroudi, Nisha Parmeshwar, Aileen Gozali, Merisa Piper
{"title":"乳房切除术后平坦闭合:一种混合方法分析患者的结果和观点。","authors":"Daniel Soroudi, Nisha Parmeshwar, Aileen Gozali, Merisa Piper","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17288-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the psychosocial impact of mastectomy is crucial for guiding patient decisions on breast reconstruction. The BREAST-Q survey has been instrumental in assessing patient satisfaction. This study examines patient-reported outcomes and experiences with post-mastectomy flat closure, aiming to refine decision-making support for this option.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review analyzed flat closure outcomes post-mastectomy, examining patient demographics, surgical details, and complications. Following consent, patients completed the BREAST-Q survey, rating satisfaction and factors influencing their choice for flat closure. The study also included qualitative analysis from patient emails, employing an inductive, triangulated approach to extract themes and provide a multifaceted understanding of the post-surgical experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 252 patients underwent flat closure post-mastectomy. The overall postoperative complication rate was 17.5% (n = 44); 19.8% (n = 50) completed the BREAST-Q survey, reporting high satisfaction with their surgeons, moderate satisfaction with their breasts, and high physical well-being. Survey results illuminated reasons for choosing flat closure, such as lower complication rates and avoidance of foreign objects. Furthermore, qualitative feedback from 15 email correspondents revealed some limitations of the survey's relevance and language, highlighting emotional impacts and a desire to improve future surveys.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study distills the flat closure experience post-mastectomy, highlighting its viability and alignment with patient preferences for fewer complications and quicker recovery. It reveals the BREAST-Q's limitations in fully capturing patients' nuanced experiences, underscoring the necessity for more tailored data collection methods. Future research must refine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and ensure flat closure is a routinely discussed option in post-mastectomy care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"5827-5837"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Mastectomy Flat Closure: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Patient Outcomes and Perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Soroudi, Nisha Parmeshwar, Aileen Gozali, Merisa Piper\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-17288-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the psychosocial impact of mastectomy is crucial for guiding patient decisions on breast reconstruction. The BREAST-Q survey has been instrumental in assessing patient satisfaction. This study examines patient-reported outcomes and experiences with post-mastectomy flat closure, aiming to refine decision-making support for this option.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review analyzed flat closure outcomes post-mastectomy, examining patient demographics, surgical details, and complications. Following consent, patients completed the BREAST-Q survey, rating satisfaction and factors influencing their choice for flat closure. The study also included qualitative analysis from patient emails, employing an inductive, triangulated approach to extract themes and provide a multifaceted understanding of the post-surgical experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 252 patients underwent flat closure post-mastectomy. The overall postoperative complication rate was 17.5% (n = 44); 19.8% (n = 50) completed the BREAST-Q survey, reporting high satisfaction with their surgeons, moderate satisfaction with their breasts, and high physical well-being. Survey results illuminated reasons for choosing flat closure, such as lower complication rates and avoidance of foreign objects. Furthermore, qualitative feedback from 15 email correspondents revealed some limitations of the survey's relevance and language, highlighting emotional impacts and a desire to improve future surveys.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study distills the flat closure experience post-mastectomy, highlighting its viability and alignment with patient preferences for fewer complications and quicker recovery. It reveals the BREAST-Q's limitations in fully capturing patients' nuanced experiences, underscoring the necessity for more tailored data collection methods. Future research must refine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and ensure flat closure is a routinely discussed option in post-mastectomy care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5827-5837\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222307/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17288-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17288-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:了解乳房切除术的社会心理影响对指导患者决定乳房重建至关重要。BREAST-Q调查在评估患者满意度方面发挥了重要作用。本研究检查了患者报告的乳房切除术后扁平闭合的结果和经验,旨在完善该选择的决策支持。方法:回顾性分析乳房切除术后平坦闭合的结果,检查患者人口统计学、手术细节和并发症。同意后,患者完成BREAST-Q调查,评估满意度和影响其选择平腹缝合的因素。该研究还包括对患者电子邮件的定性分析,采用归纳、三角方法提取主题,并提供对术后体验的多方面理解。结果:总体而言,252例患者在乳房切除术后进行了平闭手术。术后总并发症发生率为17.5% (n = 44);19.8% (n = 50)完成了BREAST-Q调查,报告对外科医生的满意度高,对乳房的满意度中等,身体健康程度高。调查结果阐明了选择平缝合的原因,如并发症发生率低和避免异物。此外,来自15位电子邮件通讯员的定性反馈揭示了调查的相关性和语言的一些局限性,强调了情感影响和改进未来调查的愿望。结论:本研究总结了乳房切除术后平坦闭合的经验,强调了其可行性,并符合患者的偏好,并发症更少,恢复更快。它揭示了BREAST-Q在充分捕捉患者细微体验方面的局限性,强调了更有必要定制数据收集方法。未来的研究必须完善患者报告的结果测量(PROMs),并确保平坦闭合是乳房切除术后护理的常规讨论选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-Mastectomy Flat Closure: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Patient Outcomes and Perspectives.

Background: Understanding the psychosocial impact of mastectomy is crucial for guiding patient decisions on breast reconstruction. The BREAST-Q survey has been instrumental in assessing patient satisfaction. This study examines patient-reported outcomes and experiences with post-mastectomy flat closure, aiming to refine decision-making support for this option.

Methods: A retrospective review analyzed flat closure outcomes post-mastectomy, examining patient demographics, surgical details, and complications. Following consent, patients completed the BREAST-Q survey, rating satisfaction and factors influencing their choice for flat closure. The study also included qualitative analysis from patient emails, employing an inductive, triangulated approach to extract themes and provide a multifaceted understanding of the post-surgical experience.

Results: Overall, 252 patients underwent flat closure post-mastectomy. The overall postoperative complication rate was 17.5% (n = 44); 19.8% (n = 50) completed the BREAST-Q survey, reporting high satisfaction with their surgeons, moderate satisfaction with their breasts, and high physical well-being. Survey results illuminated reasons for choosing flat closure, such as lower complication rates and avoidance of foreign objects. Furthermore, qualitative feedback from 15 email correspondents revealed some limitations of the survey's relevance and language, highlighting emotional impacts and a desire to improve future surveys.

Conclusions: This study distills the flat closure experience post-mastectomy, highlighting its viability and alignment with patient preferences for fewer complications and quicker recovery. It reveals the BREAST-Q's limitations in fully capturing patients' nuanced experiences, underscoring the necessity for more tailored data collection methods. Future research must refine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and ensure flat closure is a routinely discussed option in post-mastectomy care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信